GI Joe 2: Retaliation

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I like all the complaining about Tatum and how he's going to ruin this film. He's a decent actor but I think he only acts to the ability the director lifts him up to. He's had some really good roles, recently 21 jump street and the other GREAT role he had was "A Guide to recognizing your saints" where he played the troubled youth opposite Shia Labouff. Both of whom did there best work in the movie. Tatums good as long as he has a director that can pull it out of him.
 
Yeah, I'm thinking we'll be getting an entirely different film now. I'd actually like to see how they'd differ though. But I have no idea if the original will even see the light of day in any form.
 
I'm kind of torn. On one hand I'd like to see this crash and burn in the worse way possible and hope for a total reboot of the series, but otoh what if it crashed so badly they just gave up on Joe films altogether. :(
 
This new one didn't look completely terrible. It looked cheesy in a so bad it's good kind of way.

I think it's nice to see a studio realize that movies like this aren't going to stand up against movies that put quality of storytelling over just filling a movie with stuff that appeals to teen boys.
 
I like all the complaining about Tatum and how he's going to ruin this film. He's a decent actor but I think he only acts to the ability the director lifts him up to. He's had some really good roles, recently 21 jump street and the other GREAT role he had was "A Guide to recognizing your saints" where he played the troubled youth opposite Shia Labouff. Both of whom did there best work in the movie. Tatums good as long as he has a director that can pull it out of him.

Um.... :mwaha
 
That kid was kinda annoying. He was obsessed with Jaws.

But he was OK. Better then the other asses on that forum.

Easily the worst place i've ever been. :lecture

Dude what the hell did you do? All those times you told me not to argue with those mods and your the one that gets banned ? I don't get it?
 
That's exactly what will happen. And from that point on, Tatum's Duke will join Roadblock and everybody else necessitating the need for not just additional scenes, but really a whole new film. All this reminds me of what happened with that Exorcist prequel years back. William Friedkin shot his prequel which was rejected by Warner Brothers for not being scary enough then WB brought in Jan De Bont to reshoot several scenes. What De Bont ended up doing was film an entirely different film which was awful. The Friedkin version was eventually released on DVD but it too wasn't all that good either.

If I was John Chu, I'd be pretty ____ing upset right now. Paramount is probably going to take GI Joe 2 away from him and give it to some "new" Paramount picked director who will shoot scenes especially for 3D. Yuck!
I remember that Exorcist fiasco and how the legend was the Friedkin version was superior. When it finally came out on DVD, I honestly felt the De Bont version was much scarier with the right mood and the Friedkin version is exactly that, not very scary and lacked the mood.
 
Last edited:
What the hell? I got an in fraction for thr "all the woozaza i give" post.....??? What is it about that sentence that bothers people. Also. I bypassed no laungage filer. It bleeped.

Confused...:confused:
 
I guess I get the infraction for posting the count with a cuss word, don't know why it spilled onto you. :dunno
 
I don't think I'll bother going to see this now. Note the confirmation about expanding Tatum's role:

Deadline has posted an exclusive article in which it explains the various problems which prompted the GI Joe Retaliation delay for 3D. The information posted comes from alleged Paramount insiders:

"This was a case of letting a schedule to fill a summer slot dictate the film not being in 3D even though we knew that would be the most commercial version of the film. Then in the spring there were 2 big events. First John Carter lost $200M despite the best efforts of the Pixar brain trust. But the 3D film managed to gross over $200M overseas, nearly tripling its U.S. take.

“Also Channing Tatum had a breakout spring, starring in The Vow and 21 Jump Street. In our first screening of the film the reaction from audiences was good but with 2 big concerns: 1) They didn’t like the fact that Channing and The Rock really didn’t have any time to develop a friendship before Channing died, and 2) Why wasn’t it going to be in 3D? We went back and shot another week with Channing to develop more of his story with The Rock, which made the film play much better. But we didn’t have the time to be in 3D.

“Then a week ago Battleship basically had the same performance as John Carter – $60M-$70M U.S. and just over $200M international. That was just a wake-up call that said to us we need to offer the best version of the film irrespective of summer market share to ensure the best possible performance. And not being in 3D will cost us a ton of business internationally."

The Hollywood Reporter has also posted an article and stated the following:

"Paramount sources say studio chair Brad Grey and vice chair Rob Moore felt the expense was preferable to a duel with Sony’s Spider-Man reboot, out July 3.

“They looked at the landscape and realized they couldn’t compete,” agrees the producer in an appraisal shared by many executives and agents. Add to that the sinking of Universal’s $200 million-plus Battleship — another film based on a Hasbro property — and the potential downside looked especially distressing. So Paramount is adding 3D in hope of bolstering overseas box office and taking the opportunity to expand the role of Channing Tatum, whose stardom has grown thanks to The Vow and 21 Jump Street. In fact, Tatum’s character originally died in Retaliation, but it’s now possible he will be resurrected."

The article also has the following statement about Paramount, by an unnamed, "prominent player":

"“They are impossible to do business with,” says a prominent player. “They spend less money on movies than anybody; they develop fewer movies than anybody.”

The above statement was with regards to Paramount relying on hits by outsiders like Marvel Studios, in lieu of developing their own product.

https://www.hisstank.com/gi-joe-new...ind-gi-joe-retaliation-delay-explained-11401/
 
EPIC FAIL

I ____in Tatum has more screen time, I will vow to never watch another Paramount ____ fest for as long as I live, he ____in sucks ass in any roll

If I play MadLibs with your post, it suddenly becomes pornographic with you wanting him to do dirty, dirty things to you. :lol
 
Back
Top