SilverStar17
Super Freak
I personally thought WW was a great film with a strong moral message (as I think MoS and BvS were as well) and demonstrated quite well and effectively that you can have a strong, empowered, female lead character of beauty who doesn't want to settle for less than what she feels she is capable of, without that character needing to possess many of these ridiculous qualities that many of these SJWs for women's empowerment try to impute to their own image of a "strong woman". Despite WW coming from a place in which men are considered the weaker gender and less powerful, her attention still gets diverted to coo at little babies and she ultimately ends up falling in love with an equally strong (internally) heroic man; both of them initially scoffing at the notion of needing one man or woman in their life, but by the end of the film, both realize they need each other.
While that may be the case, that doesn't mean it gets a pass on being held to the same set of standards. You either think it's a good film just like any other film based on the same standards you use, or it isn't. The minute you start giving it a pass merely based on the gender of the titular character, it becomes biased.
I don't know if I'd call it "gender politics"; I think like a lot of people they just really liked the newness of seeing a female-led superhero movie, and one that viewed that world in a slightly different way.
While that may be the case, that doesn't mean it gets a pass on being held to the same set of standards. You either think it's a good film just like any other film based on the same standards you use, or it isn't. The minute you start giving it a pass merely based on the gender of the titular character, it becomes biased.