batfan08
Super Freak
I think comic relief is not only important in films, it's realistic and natural. In real life, even in the most dire situations, people can find a way to crack some jokes to ease the tension, or even just take their minds off of whatever bad stuff they're going through for a moment. Humor is one way we humans cope. As the saying goes "If you don't laugh, you'll cry."
Great post. Have you ever read Will Brooker's "Hunting the Dark Knight"? It's a very dense read, but the argument of the book (what I got from it) is very close to what you just said. Batman is too big to be put in the box of being ONLY dark, serious, gritty that has become the default "true" version of Batman for many modern fans. This "Batman = Dark ONLY" boundary for the character has been tightly controlled and encouraged by the DC Editorial Board + WB Studio Execs in the type of Batman films and other media they have green-lit for the past several decades. Anything that does fit the mold (Denny O'Neil/ Frank Miller/ Burton / Nolan / B:TAS /Arkham Games etc) is praised to different degrees as "getting Batman right". While the stuff that doesn't toe that line is summarily rejected by fans and downplayed by the WB (West /Schumacher etc) It's only in recent years that this trend has loosened up a bit, with the light-hearted animated Brave and Bold and WB's recent embracing of the 60s Batman in new mechandise and a comic series.
I haven't, but now, I'm very intrigued, and you've definitely just put it on my radar. Batman is great, and, like you said, he's too great to be chained to a single interpretation.