1/6 Hot Toys BvS: Dawn of Justice-Wonder Woman

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The only problem was how she was introduced... she wasn't developed well and like many of the things in the movie, felt forced in/rushed.

Her portrayal was great, loved the accent. Some dialogue was iffy and some shots could have been better, but none of these things can be blamed on Gadot.

I feel that the main actors did fine, some even great... but everything else around them was pretty sloppy. Feel bad for Affleck.

Developed - you mean like Falcon in TWS... "Hi Steve, let's be friends" ...then when it all kicks off "oh, by the way I forgot to tell you, I have some hi-tech wings, i'll help you!"
Funny how this kinda criticism only goes one way!

I liked how she was handled and how she was introduced –*Meta-files on the others were a bit clunky, but Wonder Woman doesn't merit that criticism.
 
Developed - you mean like Falcon in TWS... "Hi Steve, let's be friends" ...then when it all kicks off "oh, by the way I forgot to tell you, I have some hi-tech wings, i'll help you!"
Funny how this kinda criticism only goes one way!

I liked how she was handled and how she was introduced –*Meta-files on the others were a bit clunky, but Wonder Woman doesn't merit that criticism.

Yup. Then in the next marvel movie there's just a single throw away line that on the events of the previous movie. "Yeah something happenedbut it isn't important"

How Wonder Woman was introduced was fantastic. She had given up fighting for humanity. It took something like Doomsday who is basically unkillable for her to come out. Because at the end it is in her nature to care. I'm personally more excited for the solo movie now.
 
I finally saw the movie today, and I really didn't like it, but that shot of Supes, Bats, and Wonder Woman together gave me chills. My original plan was to only pick up the Wonder Woman figure, but I'm actually considering picking up the other two just to display the whole trio. It reminds me a lot of that turnaround shot from the first Avengers with the whole team assembled in New York.

I don't think it is... let's be fair, Gal wasn't given a chance before the movie began even filming. Her acting abilities were questioned. And if you're honest with yourself, if you hadn't heard that **** before seeing the movie - regardless of if you liked it or not - you certainly would not have found fault with her.

...

We'll see how she does in a solo movie – but she certainly carried it off in BvS, only the biggest trolls could disagree with that.

I was a fan of Gadot's casting initially (based on the Fast and Furious movies), and I enjoyed her portrayal of Wonder Woman. Sad fact- I got a better sense of her character in her 10 minutes on-screen than I did of Superman's character in the whole movie (plus Man of Steel). Flaws of BvS aside, I'm really excited for the WW solo film. She seems genuinely excited about the character, and I think the WWI period setting will make for something different and interesting (for what it's worth, Captain America TFA is still my favorite MCU movie, partly because of the WWII setting).
 
I finally saw the movie today, and I really didn't like it, but that shot of Supes, Bats, and Wonder Woman together gave me chills. My original plan was to only pick up the Wonder Woman figure, but I'm actually considering picking up the other two just to display the whole trio. It reminds me a lot of that turnaround shot from the first Avengers with the whole team assembled in New York.



I was a fan of Gadot's casting initially (based on the Fast and Furious movies), and I enjoyed her portrayal of Wonder Woman. Sad fact- I got a better sense of her character in her 10 minutes on-screen than I did of Superman's character in the whole movie (plus Man of Steel). Flaws of BvS aside, I'm really excited for the WW solo film. She seems genuinely excited about the character, and I think the WWI period setting will make for something different and interesting (for what it's worth, Captain America TFA is still my favorite MCU movie, partly because of the WWII setting).

Ah, sorry to hear you didn't really enjoy the film. I personally thought it was really good, and liked it even better on my second viewing. I know what you mean though regarding that first shot of Supes, Bats and WW together. That's a good analogy in comparing it to that scene in The Avengers when it showed the Avengers assembled in a circle.

That's precisely the shot I plan to use as a model to pose my BvS Supes, Bats and WW together.

image.jpg
 
Ah, sorry to hear you didn't really enjoy the film. I personally thought it was really good, and liked it even better on my second viewing. I know what you mean though regarding that first shot of Supes, Bats and WW together. That's a good analogy in comparing it to that scene in The Avengers when it showed the Avengers assembled in a circle.

That's precisely the shot I plan to use as a model to pose my BvS Supes, Bats and WW together.

View attachment 257739

I didn't enjoy Man of Steel very much, so I knew what I was getting with this movie in terms of tone and character. The frustrating thing is that I think the casting has been phenomenal in the DCU; Zack Snyder just hasn't made a movie yet that I enjoy (DC or otherwise). That said, Suicide Squad looks amazingly fantastic (I'm actually more excited about that than Civil War, and I love Cap).

I suspect a lot of collectors will be going for that same pose once all three figures are released. :hi5:
 
I didn't enjoy Man of Steel very much, so I knew what I was getting with this movie in terms of tone and character. The frustrating thing is that I think the casting has been phenomenal in the DCU; Zack Snyder just hasn't made a movie yet that I enjoy (DC or otherwise). That said, Suicide Squad looks amazingly fantastic (I'm actually more excited about that than Civil War, and I love Cap).

I suspect a lot of collectors will be going for that same pose once all three figures are released. :hi5:

Yeah, I agree with the casting choices in the DCEU, they've all turned out to be top notch. I personally really enjoyed both DCEU movies thus far with Snyder directing, as I admire him having the gall to dare to do the unexpected, and pull it off well in my opinion. Of course not everyone is going to like the films, but I do think some people may possibly dislike them because of the fact that they are indeed different, and some people aren't quite sure how to digest that. It's almost like some people feel that there's a certain blueprint you're supposed to follow when making a superhero film (lighthearted, smiling, lovey dovey romance, etc.) to where you know what to expect, but Snyder's kind of taking it to a different level.

I'm really looking forward to Suicide Squad as well, but I can't say I'm looking forward to it more than Civil War. :duff
 
Yeah, I agree with the casting choices in the DCEU, they've all turned out to be top notch. I personally really enjoyed both DCEU movies thus far with Snyder directing, as I admire him having the gall to dare to do the unexpected, and pull it off well in my opinion. Of course not everyone is going to like the films, but I do think some people may possibly dislike them because of the fact that they are indeed different, and some people aren't quite sure how to digest that. It's almost like some people feel that there's a certain blueprint you're supposed to follow when making a superhero film (lighthearted, smiling, lovey dovey romance, etc.) to where you know what to expect, but Snyder's kind of taking it to a different level.

I'm really looking forward to Suicide Squad as well, but I can't say I'm looking forward to it more than Civil War. :duff

I respect Zack Snyder for doing something different, though I'd obviously disagree on how successful he's been with these movies. There are some interesting ideas in these two movies, but I also don't think the dark tone is appropriate for anyone who isn't Batman. Superman is someone we should aspire to be (not unlike with Cap), but I've yet to really care about or connect with his character in two movies. He hems and haws about being a hero, and that's not the essence of the character.

Snyder's storytelling style doesn't work for me either. While it does deviate (slightly) from the standard superhero blueprint, it often feels more like him showing off what technical stuff he can do (camera snap zooms, super slow-mo, really fast ping-ponging as characters get smashed around) rather than what actually adds to the story. The non-standard editing can be done well, but the jump from one time/scene to another should make some logical sense.

I'd be curious to hear what you think Snyder's done to elevate the superhero movie genre. I dislike the formulaic aspect of most movies, but there are certain character/story beats that work well despite the cliche, and I don't believe Snyder's incorporated them in his storytelling (which would be why it all feels so lacking to me).
 
I respect Zack Snyder for doing something different, though I'd obviously disagree on how successful he's been with these movies. There are some interesting ideas in these two movies, but I also don't think the dark tone is appropriate for anyone who isn't Batman. Superman is someone we should aspire to be (not unlike with Cap), but I've yet to really care about or connect with his character in two movies. He hems and haws about being a hero, and that's not the essence of the character.

Snyder's storytelling style doesn't work for me either. While it does deviate (slightly) from the standard superhero blueprint, it often feels more like him showing off what technical stuff he can do (camera snap zooms, super slow-mo, really fast ping-ponging as characters get smashed around) rather than what actually adds to the story. The non-standard editing can be done well, but the jump from one time/scene to another should make some logical sense.

I'd be curious to hear what you think Snyder's done to elevate the superhero movie genre. I dislike the formulaic aspect of most movies, but there are certain character/story beats that work well despite the cliche, and I don't believe Snyder's incorporated them in his storytelling (which would be why it all feels so lacking to me).

For me personally, I love the verisimilitude that he brings to them for one. I think he's been able to tell these characters' stories in such a way to where they can possibly be relatable to people in any particular person's own way. For instance, Superman's feelings in BvS. He doesn't see himself as a God, he doesn't see himself as a savior; in his own mind, he's simply a guy trying to do what he can with what he has. Therefore, when his efforts go unnoticed and he's rejected, one often would start to question themselves and wonder why you are wasting your time trying to do this when nobody is going to appreciate it. I think a lot of people in their own various ways can relate to this, and the fact is that you always mean something to someone, regardless if you realize it or not.

For me personally, I prefer my superhero films to be a little more on the darker, more serious side. I feel if they are too lighthearted, they are a bit too campy for my taste. I think it's because of the type of world that we live in today, so I enjoy seeing just how these characters would fit in to today's generally cynical society and how they would be interpreted and perceived. Even with Cavill's Supes, I still very much get a feeling of hope. And you're completely right, because I think when a lot of people choose who their favorite superhero is, they generally choose someone who reminds them of themselves. However, your heroes should inspire you because you aspire to be like them; hence, why you say you "look up" to someone, because you feel they're above you. I don't think a lot of people in today's society like to feel like anyone else is above them, or like to be reminded of how "flawed" they are.

I can see how the fast paced scenes would be bothersome for some people, but it's something that doesn't bother me because I'm still easily able to follow what's going on. I especially get why they did it in BvS because they were having to essentially set the stage for the climax of the film by flip-flopping between three major different characters. I'm glad though that MoS and BvS were pretty much devoid of the super slow-mo, because I think it was extremely superfluous in films like 300.
 
Developed - you mean like Falcon in TWS... "Hi Steve, let's be friends" ...then when it all kicks off "oh, by the way I forgot to tell you, I have some hi-tech wings, i'll help you!"
Funny how this kinda criticism only goes one way!

I liked how she was handled and how she was introduced –*Meta-files on the others were a bit clunky, but Wonder Woman doesn't merit that criticism.

The hell... I never even mentioned a sentence about TWS or anything Marvel.

Don't even get me started on doomsday **** or any of this "film's" technical blunders.

It's obvious what the studio's priorities are with this movie.
 
Last edited:
For me personally, I love the verisimilitude that he brings to them for one. I think he's been able to tell these characters' stories in such a way to where they can possibly be relatable to people in any particular person's own way. For instance, Superman's feelings in BvS. He doesn't see himself as a God, he doesn't see himself as a savior; in his own mind, he's simply a guy trying to do what he can with what he has. Therefore, when his efforts go unnoticed and he's rejected, one often would start to question themselves and wonder why you are wasting your time trying to do this when nobody is going to appreciate it. I think a lot of people in their own various ways can relate to this, and the fact is that you always mean something to someone, regardless if you realize it or not.

For me personally, I prefer my superhero films to be a little more on the darker, more serious side. I feel if they are too lighthearted, they are a bit too campy for my taste. I think it's because of the type of world that we live in today, so I enjoy seeing just how these characters would fit in to today's generally cynical society and how they would be interpreted and perceived. Even with Cavill's Supes, I still very much get a feeling of hope. And you're completely right, because I think when a lot of people choose who their favorite superhero is, they generally choose someone who reminds them of themselves. However, your heroes should inspire you because you aspire to be like them; hence, why you say you "look up" to someone, because you feel they're above you. I don't think a lot of people in today's society like to feel like anyone else is above them, or like to be reminded of how "flawed" they are.

I can see how the fast paced scenes would be bothersome for some people, but it's something that doesn't me because I'm still easily able to follow what's going on. I especially get why they did it in BvS because they were having to essentially set the stage for the climax of the film by flip-flopping between three major different characters. I'm glad though that MoS and BvS were pretty much devoid of the super slow-mo, because I think it was extremely superfluous in films like 300.

:yess::exactly:

My sentiments also.

Also, Snyder needed to cut over 30 minutes from the movie. That's a sixth of the movie's run time. I feel the movie is jumpy, but I can still follow it. Other than that, I like the more realistic portrayal of characters and how the world is very much like ours. That can make it ugly, dark or gritty, but I believe that danger and wonder are different sides to the same coin and I just don't feel that with the majority of other superhero movies. They come off as just going through the motions.

I like how he emphasises that there's a cost to what the heroes do. The way Snyder handles it isn't alien to the comics though.
 
Lex was ****ing abysmal however. I wanted Batman to kill him. I mean I don't see why this version wouldn't.
 
I don't think it is... let's be fair, Gal wasn't given a chance before the movie began even filming. Her acting abilities were questioned. And if you're honest with yourself, if you hadn't heard that **** before seeing the movie - regardless of if you liked it or not - you certainly would not have found fault with her.
Let's also be honest she coulda stank up the joint like Chris Hemsworth in the MCU... instead we got a demi-god(dess) that actually befit that title and looked like and did kick serious ass!
Yep she did look better and stronger than Superman - which I personally think was brilliant... and made complete sense as she has been at it for a lot longer than Superman, and has been trained in combat. Whereas Superman was still learning his trade, and had not been trained.
We'll see how she does in a solo movie – but she certainly carried it off in BvS, only the biggest trolls could disagree with that.

In all honesty, I dindt know there was such a huge backlash against her before filming began. Why was there?

So, that hasn't altered my view. All I'm saying is, she was solid. A solid performance in a somewhat underwhelming film (for me). As for Hemsworth, I think he does a fine job in the MCU. Seems a lot of people don't get the fact that as he is a god from another planet so his interactions with humans will be odd. That's the point in his delivery.

Resorting to 'only trolls could disagree' only serves to show how biased your comments appear as you enjoyed the film.

:peace
 
If you really didn't know about all the backlash gadot received once her casting was announced then that's one big rock you've been living under. I kind of envy you, actually, as it was (is) pretty ridiculous the amount of flack she caught over her casting.
 
Whats up guys, i found a video of that trinity display!



It'll be hard to replicate that exact scene in the movie because the articulation isn't there but this is how im having mine
 
For me personally, I love the verisimilitude that he brings to them for one. I think he's been able to tell these characters' stories in such a way to where they can possibly be relatable to people in any particular person's own way. For instance, Superman's feelings in BvS. He doesn't see himself as a God, he doesn't see himself as a savior; in his own mind, he's simply a guy trying to do what he can with what he has. Therefore, when his efforts go unnoticed and he's rejected, one often would start to question themselves and wonder why you are wasting your time trying to do this when nobody is going to appreciate it. I think a lot of people in their own various ways can relate to this, and the fact is that you always mean something to someone, regardless if you realize it or not.

For me personally, I prefer my superhero films to be a little more on the darker, more serious side. I feel if they are too lighthearted, they are a bit too campy for my taste. I think it's because of the type of world that we live in today, so I enjoy seeing just how these characters would fit in to today's generally cynical society and how they would be interpreted and perceived. Even with Cavill's Supes, I still very much get a feeling of hope. And you're completely right, because I think when a lot of people choose who their favorite superhero is, they generally choose someone who reminds them of themselves. However, your heroes should inspire you because you aspire to be like them; hence, why you say you "look up" to someone, because you feel they're above you. I don't think a lot of people in today's society like to feel like anyone else is above them, or like to be reminded of how "flawed" they are.

I can see how the fast paced scenes would be bothersome for some people, but it's something that doesn't bother me because I'm still easily able to follow what's going on. I especially get why they did it in BvS because they were having to essentially set the stage for the climax of the film by flip-flopping between three major different characters. I'm glad though that MoS and BvS were pretty much devoid of the super slow-mo, because I think it was extremely superfluous in films like 300.

Just to add to that, IMO, a lot of people didn't like his Lex exactly due to the preconceived idea they had of the character, which could have worked, but wouldn't fit with this modern world, IMO.

The adaptation of Lex to a millennial businessman was something I really enjoyed, the traditional "Donald Trump with brains" lex route would not work, IMO.

Some say: "He had no real motivation, his reasons/motives were not explained". I think they were, in his first scene, when he gives thar awkward speech: "Knowledge is power. Knowledge without power is a paradox" (something like that).

A lot of people have a problem with the destruction in MoS, but believe that the battle of New York in Avengers was cleaner just cause they didn't show the same level of destruction (that, IMO, shows the difference between trying to portray thar kind of event in a more believable way, it's impossible to avoid that destruction and death in a situation like that).
 
I respect Zack Snyder for doing something different, though I'd obviously disagree on how successful he's been with these movies. There are some interesting ideas in these two movies, but I also don't think the dark tone is appropriate for anyone who isn't Batman. Superman is someone we should aspire to be (not unlike with Cap), but I've yet to really care about or connect with his character in two movies. He hems and haws about being a hero, and that's not the essence of the character.

Snyder's storytelling style doesn't work for me either. While it does deviate (slightly) from the standard superhero blueprint, it often feels more like him showing off what technical stuff he can do (camera snap zooms, super slow-mo, really fast ping-ponging as characters get smashed around) rather than what actually adds to the story. The non-standard editing can be done well, but the jump from one time/scene to another should make some logical sense.

I'd be curious to hear what you think Snyder's done to elevate the superhero movie genre. I dislike the formulaic aspect of most movies, but there are certain character/story beats that work well despite the cliche, and I don't believe Snyder's incorporated them in his storytelling (which would be why it all feels so lacking to me).

All that camerawork IS Snyder's style- it's what he does- it's his imprint. Watchmen is truly amazing in directorial style and BvS doesn't even match it. Like a Kubrick , it's not everyone's taste. Glad you can see and idenify what you don't like unlike most who simply dismiss him offhand.
 
Just to add to that, IMO, a lot of people didn't like his Lex exactly due to the preconceived idea they had of the character, which could have worked, but wouldn't fit with this modern world, IMO.

The adaptation of Lex to a millennial businessman was something I really enjoyed, the traditional "Donald Trump with brains" lex route would not work, IMO.

Some say: "He had no real motivation, his reasons/motives were not explained". I think they were, in his first scene, when he gives thar awkward speech: "Knowledge is power. Knowledge without power is a paradox" (something like that).

A lot of people have a problem with the destruction in MoS, but believe that the battle of New York in Avengers was cleaner just cause they didn't show the same level of destruction (that, IMO, shows the difference between trying to portray thar kind of event in a more believable way, it's impossible to avoid that destruction and death in a situation like that).

I concur.

And I'm presuming that the preconceived notion that many people possibly had of the character was probably based on Gene Hackman's portrayal, who was great as Lex, but like you said, wouldn't fit in this modern world. Same with Jack Nicholson's Joker in the '89 Batman and Heath Ledger's Joker in TDK. I also feel that Bryan Cranston would make an excellent Lex Luthor, but after having seen the film, I don't feel that an older version of Lex Luthor would have really worked in the context of this film.

And yeah, a lot of people slam Snyder for that also, but I believe that he's only simply trying to convey the realistic magnitude of the destruction that events like that would really cause.
 
For me personally, I love the verisimilitude that he brings to them for one. I think he's been able to tell these characters' stories in such a way to where they can possibly be relatable to people in any particular person's own way. For instance, Superman's feelings in BvS. He doesn't see himself as a God, he doesn't see himself as a savior; in his own mind, he's simply a guy trying to do what he can with what he has. Therefore, when his efforts go unnoticed and he's rejected, one often would start to question themselves and wonder why you are wasting your time trying to do this when nobody is going to appreciate it. I think a lot of people in their own various ways can relate to this, and the fact is that you always mean something to someone, regardless if you realize it or not.

For me personally, I prefer my superhero films to be a little more on the darker, more serious side. I feel if they are too lighthearted, they are a bit too campy for my taste. I think it's because of the type of world that we live in today, so I enjoy seeing just how these characters would fit in to today's generally cynical society and how they would be interpreted and perceived. Even with Cavill's Supes, I still very much get a feeling of hope. And you're completely right, because I think when a lot of people choose who their favorite superhero is, they generally choose someone who reminds them of themselves. However, your heroes should inspire you because you aspire to be like them; hence, why you say you "look up" to someone, because you feel they're above you. I don't think a lot of people in today's society like to feel like anyone else is above them, or like to be reminded of how "flawed" they are.

I can see how the fast paced scenes would be bothersome for some people, but it's something that doesn't bother me because I'm still easily able to follow what's going on. I especially get why they did it in BvS because they were having to essentially set the stage for the climax of the film by flip-flopping between three major different characters. I'm glad though that MoS and BvS were pretty much devoid of the super slow-mo, because I think it was extremely superfluous in films like 300.

That bolded part's a good point, but I think we also have a big difference of opinion on the second paragraph (which ties back to the first). While I can see the world as being flawed and cynical, I don't necessarily want to see all of that reflected on screen in the movies. I see superheroes as a way to escape that and to be reminded of the good that people can be. Given the world we live in today, I'd actually argue it's even more important that our heroes rise above our flaws and give us something to aspire to (as opposed to making them more similar to us).

I think the darker, more serious tone worked wonderfully for Nolan's Dark Knight movies, and there are characters where that tone is appropriate (i.e. Daredevil). I've been hoping Marvel would commit to a darker, more personal approach to one of their characters in the MCU movies (IM3 had promise, TWS came close, and Civil War might actually be it). Things don't have to be happy-go-lucky, but I want to see superheroes be better (and maybe flawed) versions of ourselves. Superman in Zack Snyder's movies reflects the flaws in ourselves, but not necessarily the inherent good. I don't need Superman to be a god or a savior, just someone who wants to do the right thing even when the world around him doesn't appreciate it. The Dark Knight showed a similar struggle about the need for the hero, but I think it did a better job of capturing the doubt and the desire to do good. Superman in MoS and BvS hints at that, but I'm never convinced that he really wants to do the right thing or that he really thinks he should step down. He says all these things, but it feels more like talk (with meaningful stares) rather than real character development.

Anyways, neither of our viewpoints about superheroes is any more right than the other, but it is interesting to hear an opinion in favor of the movie (even if I can't fully understand or relate to it). :duff

Just to add to that, IMO, a lot of people didn't like his Lex exactly due to the preconceived idea they had of the character, which could have worked, but wouldn't fit with this modern world, IMO.

The adaptation of Lex to a millennial businessman was something I really enjoyed, the traditional "Donald Trump with brains" lex route would not work, IMO.

Some say: "He had no real motivation, his reasons/motives were not explained". I think they were, in his first scene, when he gives thar awkward speech: "Knowledge is power. Knowledge without power is a paradox" (something like that).

A lot of people have a problem with the destruction in MoS, but believe that the battle of New York in Avengers was cleaner just cause they didn't show the same level of destruction (that, IMO, shows the difference between trying to portray thar kind of event in a more believable way, it's impossible to avoid that destruction and death in a situation like that).

I think the one thing they got right with Lex was the idea that he wanted to show everyone that Superman wasn't as great as they made him out to be. I was also exceptionally happy that he wasn't plotting some crazy real estate scheme that Superman ends up foiling.

As far as the destruction, Avengers also didn't show superheroes being thrown and blasted at 100+ mph speeds through buildings. Destruction will inevitably occur in a downtown fight like that, but MoS and BvS both seem to glorify the action (and in turn, the damage) by emphasing the speed with which everything happens. I never got the sense that the filmmakers respected all the destruction that was happening so much as they wanted to show it off (like "look how many buildings we can pummel with CGI!"). Avengers had the opposite problem where it kind of ignored the destruction until the end (who's going to clean it up?). That's how I viewed it anyways.

All that camerawork IS Snyder's style- it's what he does- it's his imprint. Watchmen is truly amazing in directorial style and BvS doesn't even match it. Like a Kubrick , it's not everyone's taste. Glad you can see and idenify what you don't like unlike most who simply dismiss him offhand.

Watchmen was the first Zack Snyder movie I ever saw and also the one where I realized that I didn't care for his style at all (which he thankfully toned down for MoS and BvS). He did try to remain faithful to the source material, which I respect, but his style was too distracting for me to really appreciate the movie. I'll give it another chance one day though (I keep hoping that watching the Ultimate Cut will change my thoughts on the movie).
 
That bolded part's a good point, but I think we also have a big difference of opinion on the second paragraph (which ties back to the first). While I can see the world as being flawed and cynical, I don't necessarily want to see all of that reflected on screen in the movies. I see superheroes as a way to escape that and to be reminded of the good that people can be. Given the world we live in today, I'd actually argue it's even more important that our heroes rise above our flaws and give us something to aspire to (as opposed to making them more similar to us).

I think the darker, more serious tone worked wonderfully for Nolan's Dark Knight movies, and there are characters where that tone is appropriate (i.e. Daredevil). I've been hoping Marvel would commit to a darker, more personal approach to one of their characters in the MCU movies (IM3 had promise, TWS came close, and Civil War might actually be it). Things don't have to be happy-go-lucky, but I want to see superheroes be better (and maybe flawed) versions of ourselves. Superman in Zack Snyder's movies reflects the flaws in ourselves, but not necessarily the inherent good. I don't need Superman to be a god or a savior, just someone who wants to do the right thing even when the world around him doesn't appreciate it. The Dark Knight showed a similar struggle about the need for the hero, but I think it did a better job of capturing the doubt and the desire to do good. Superman in MoS and BvS hints at that, but I'm never convinced that he really wants to do the right thing or that he really thinks he should step down. He says all these things, but it feels more like talk (with meaningful stares) rather than real character development.

Anyways, neither of our viewpoints about superheroes is any more right than the other, but it is interesting to hear an opinion in favor of the movie (even if I can't fully understand or relate to it). :duff

Ah believe me, I can understand that also. People go to the movies to escape from reality for a mere few hours, so many people don't want to see "real life" played out on the big screen with all the negativity that they already encounter in the real world. Especially in a superhero film like you said, because these are supposed to be characters that people should aspire to be, not characters that already remind us of ourselves.

However, I feel that's precisely why characters such as Batman and Iron Man tend to be quite popular, especially with younger crowds, because they are "flawed". Batman's motivation to do good essentially stems from revenge for what happened to his parents, while characters such as Superman and Captain America already possess an innate goodness that isn't motivated by revenge nor anything else other than simply wanting to try and do good. In our society, many people always feel there's a catch to something, so when we encounter people and see these characters that are intrinsically good and amiable with no strings attached, we have the propensity to question their intentions. I felt this was accurately conveyed in the scene in BvS that showed Supes doing acts of goodness, while people debated the need for a "Superman" and what they feel his intentions are based on ourselves. During that scene, there was a quote that said we as people have the tendency to project ourselves onto others, so if we feel we're flawed and are capable of a certain thing, then we tend to project this onto others when it actually might not be the case. It goes back to what I mentioned in my previous post about many people not liking to feel like someone else is above them. And that quote was then followed up with another quote with someone saying that perhaps he's neither a God nor a demon, but is simply a guy who is just trying to do the right thing. The fact that Supes at the end of BvS was rejected by many, but still possessed the strength and valor to sacrifice himself for the safety of the very people that rejected him gave me all the hope in the world. I like the fact that starting with MoS, Snyder made it a learning journey for him. People are learning about him as much as he is learning about himself. He doesn't put on the blue and red suit and automatically knows what to do in every situation. Jonathan Kent's quote in MoS before his death even alludes to that, where he said that he and Martha have been doing the best they can and have been making it up as they go along, so perhaps their best isn't good enough anymore. How we handle adversity tends to be a testament to show what we're really made of. I felt Supes demonstrated this perfectly in both MoS and BvS.

Despite how cynical our society can be, I like to believe that deep down, people know what the "right" thing is. Sometimes our brains are wired and conditioned to think a certain way though.

You're right though, because that's the beauty of opinions; they're neither right nor wrong. Someone else's opinion is no more valid than yours, and yours is no more valid than theirs. It is indeed interesting to hear different viewpoints. :duff
 
Ah believe me, I can understand that also. People go to the movies to escape from reality for a mere few hours, so many people don't want to see "real life" played out on the big screen with all the negativity that they already encounter in the real world. Especially in a superhero film like you said, because these are supposed to be characters that people should aspire to be, not characters that already remind us of ourselves.

However, I feel that's precisely why characters such as Batman and Iron Man tend to be quite popular, especially with younger crowds, because they are "flawed". Batman's motivation to do good essentially stems from revenge for what happened to his parents, while characters such as Superman and Captain America already possess an innate goodness that isn't motivated by revenge nor anything else other than simply wanting to try and do good. In our society, many people always feel there's a catch to something, so when we encounter people and see these characters that are intrinsically good and amiable with no strings attached, we have the propensity to question their intentions. I felt this was accurately conveyed in the scene in BvS that showed Supes doing acts of goodness, while people debated the need for a "Superman" and what they feel his intentions are based on ourselves. During that scene, there was a quote that said we as people have the tendency to project ourselves onto others, so if we feel we're flawed and are capable of a certain thing, then we tend to project this onto others when it actually might not be the case. It goes back to what I mentioned in my previous post about many people not liking to feel like someone else is above them. And that quote was then followed up with another quote with someone saying that perhaps he's neither a God nor a demon, but is simply a guy who is just trying to do the right thing. The fact that Supes at the end of BvS was rejected by many, but still possessed the strength and valor to sacrifice himself for the safety of the very people that rejected him gave me all the hope in the world. I like the fact that starting with MoS, Snyder made it a learning journey for him. People are learning about him as much as he is learning about himself. He doesn't put on the blue and red suit and automatically knows what to do in every situation. Jonathan Kent's quote in MoS before his death even alludes to that, where he said that he and Martha have been doing the best they can and have been making it up as they go along, so perhaps their best isn't good enough anymore. How we handle adversity tends to be a testament to show what we're really made of. I felt Supes demonstrated this perfectly in both MoS and BvS.

Despite how cynical our society can be, I like to believe that deep down, people know what the "right" thing is. Sometimes our brains are wired and conditioned to think a certain way though.

You're right though, because that's the beauty of opinions; they're neither right nor wrong. Someone else's opinion is no more valid than yours, and yours is no more valid than theirs. It is indeed interesting to hear different viewpoints. :duff

:clap:goodpost::exactly:
 
Back
Top