CriterionCollector
Super Freak
Is that all I had to do to get a Solo figure that looks more like Harrison Ford?
Damn, I messed that one up.
Is that all I had to do to get a Solo figure that looks more like Harrison Ford?
Damn, I messed that one up.
Ahem*
like·ness
ˈlīknəs/
noun
noun: likeness; plural noun: likenesses
the fact or quality of being alike; resemblance.
This doesn't sound like they're trying for just a bit more than a resemblance or a passing likeness? "We will bring fans a large range of high-end collectibles with movie-accurate details and stunning likeness! The movie-accurate collectible figure is specially crafted based on the image of Harrison Ford as Han Solo... "
I have the set on PO and don't regret it one bit. I agree that the sculpt has plenty of room for improvement, but if I get what is shown there is no mistaking it as Han Solo. Chewie is a nice figure also.
I heard they only made Chewie so people would know the companion figure was actually Han Solo. I'm getting the pair
Agreed.Word. No better or worse than Bespin Luke (if you ignore the price) and I'm pretty happy with him.
As far as Star Wars Hot Toys two packs go, I think the Stormtroopers are the better sell. Good representations of the character, variety to the display, decent value.
My initial excitement of the "first 1/6 high end Chewie" has worn off. The body is nice but that face just doesn't look like Chewbacca. I know the fur is an obstacle for the portrait, but that didn't stop them from pulling off their Spider-Man figures. Chewie is an ambitious undertaking on their part, but looking hard at all the pics we've gotten, I don't think they're going to pull it off. As others have pointed out, this has quality control nightmare written all over it.
Besides the crappy boots, huge lobster hands (obvious hyperbole), tree trunk forearms (obvious hyperbole) and lack of a decent/solid Harrison Ford likeness, I think the biggest problem with Han is that he just looks like a generic Hot Toys figure. Harrison Ford/Han Solo from '77 shouldn't be lackluster, generic or even "okay" at $230. I think you have a problem when your forgettable Ben Kingsley Trevor Slattery "Mandarin" is a better representation of the character than the icon that is Han Solo. Han here is about on par with the Hot Toys GI Joe: Motion picture figures. They aren't bad really, but they're not exactly the cream of the crop. Most of those have a better likeness to the actors they represent too. Star Wars Han Solo should be better than those for a 2015 figure. There's no excuse. This Hot Toys Han seems like the bare minimum, like they're just putting out a "Han Solo" and nothing more. I don't see any work of passion in that sculpt or the outfit or anything. It'll probably be an okay figure along the lines of Spider-Man 3 New Goblin where it's an okay figure with no real quality control issues that you throw up on a shelf and say, "well I have a 'Han'", but is that really all people want? A "meh", "okay" Han. Surely this could be done better.
I already just said all that concisely in my last two posts Rubio - where's my 'nice post' response?
That infernal Difabio stealing my thunder.
What'ya mean eyes? They're black sockets right now.It's just that ****ing face. The mouth, beady eyes, it's just so weird looking.
Enter your email address to join: