maru81
Super Freak
Thanks !
Sent from my SM-G870W using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G870W using Tapatalk
is this sculpt really that bad? was intent on this as next SW HT for collect then i saw here talk of sculpt being bad, which hadnt occurred to me so asked a non-toy collecting pal for his opinion and he agreed with wht i read here thought it looked nothing at all like ford. so shifted focus to the SHF han but i love my HT bespin Luke inhand so much that i cant help but wonder if i would this fig inhand as well.
so general opinion is its off but how off? interested in hearing other views with it inhand like mayeb it is off but not a bother inhand etc
aka someone convince to buy this lol
I ended up with 2-3 from the second run (not at once) but they seemed pretty consistent and different than the first one I had. All the V2s had a missing spot on the right sideburn which is why I kept my V1 each time. My thinking was just that the paint apps came out slightly different for whatever reason on that second run (doubt it was intentional), but only had the one from the first run so it's kind of impossible for me to say if those varied a bit more.I think it's a whimsical notion that there was a change for the second release, but rather that it was pot luck how figures from either run turned out.
Mine was from the first run, and in hand the expression and paint is more comparable to the one labelled V2. The only other explanation could be that as a UK order it was from production months later than the initial release.
As a sculpt, if you shine a light from below or from above the expression and Ford likeness is really apparent. I wouldn't, for example, change it for a Jnix unless I wanted to make a Han from a later film.
Enter your email address to join: