obi_dave_kenobi
Super Freak
based on the pic quality I can only zoom in so much before getting pixelated. based on this picture it does look lazy eyed/already broke.
Hot Toys - MMS DX 01- The Dark Knight - The Joker spec and pics
- Thread starter wookster
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Commtech
Super Freak
I agree, eyes don't look parallel.
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2009
- Messages
- 15,220
- Reaction score
- 158
...whisper....who is it?...who's the bad seller?
...is it you?...
(seriously though, that is really crap, can't believe someone on here would do that, maybe I'm naive. You should name the ____er)
...is it you?...
(seriously though, that is really crap, can't believe someone on here would do that, maybe I'm naive. You should name the ____er)
my dx batman was the same way kind of looked crosseyed i took pers apart and now just move eyes individualy
cokebabies
Super Freak
Yeah, mine broke after literally the fourth time I adjusted the eyes.
I don't think I'd ever want a PERS figure again. I still need to buy a tiny screwdriver to try to manually fix it.
I don't think I'd ever want a PERS figure again. I still need to buy a tiny screwdriver to try to manually fix it.
Better than what?
I've never had an Enterbay figure in-hand, but the simple individual eye movement system seems pretty fool proof to me. Sure, it may take a little longer to get them even, but there's really nothing that can go wrong with them.
Also, what if you get a PERS figure that has eyes that aren't really parallel? For a long time I was convinced that was the case with one of mine. And apparently it really was the case with steven.giunta's figure.
Yes. That I agree with! I thought we were talking about DX01 PERS and I was replying to cokebabies that DX02 is already improved... I can only assume it will get better in each iteration
ooops I am a lil late
The San Francisco treat? If we can't trust him. . .then who can we trust
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ToJry8diwTs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
then who can we trust
The looneys that took over the asylum.
The San Francisco treat? If we can't trust him. . .then who can we trust
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/ToJry8diwTs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
hahahaha... im really hungry now...
haytil
Super Freak
crap. here it is.
Well, I have to play devil's advocate here and say the pixellation makes it unclear if the eyes are wonky are not. On the one hand, it looks like they could be. On the other hand, the image is almost certainly compressed, which would result in exactly the weirdness in the eyes that you see. There just aren't enough clear pixels of the white and black of the eyeball and pupil to see which direction they're pointing.
Not saying you aren't right Bishart, and the "broken in transit" story sure sounds fishy - I'm just saying I don't think the picture in question is clear enough to evidence one way or the other.
MorgulTongue
Super Freak
Looks clear to me! Wonky! Pixelation or not. The cop's eyes are not affected by pixelation, but his hands appear to me missing! Must be the pixelation. Word of the day is Pixelation.
^^ I have to agree. Zoomed in with my phone and it's quite clear that (looking at the pic) the left is lookig up while the right is looking straight
Similar threads
