Sachiel
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2005
- Messages
- 11,661
- Reaction score
- 825
Fixed.
I'm sorry, but did this Adam character pay WB for the license and rights to use and sell the likeness of the Joker character?
Did he pay royalties to Heath Ledger's estate to use and sell the likeness of the actor's face?
Is anyone that is actually connected to the creation of this beloved character, or this specific, beloved incarnation of the character, receiving any sort of compensation for their hard work, which apparently has been used to generate income for this presumably unlicensed artist?
Because I know Hot Toys sure as hell did pay for it.
Maybe you should think twice before you throw around words like "stealing," and consider who is doing what, exactly.
Superior? That's subjective, my friend. All of this talk of "stealing" brings up an interesting point; if HT wanted to, could they recast Adam's sculpt, get it approved by WB, and produce it with no legal repercussions? If that was the case, maybe you shouldn't be so quick to accuse them of stealing after all, at least they're producing their own work.
That's an unfair assessment, though. Adam's created a ton of Joker sculpts, most of them covering different expressions. Just because HT choose one of the looks that may be included in Adam's army of Joker expressions, they're suddenly "heavily influenced" and "inspired" by him. My personal view is that this whole thing is a big load of hooey, but the fact of the matter is that we'll never know what the case is.
Noone can prove anything about what influenced HT's direction with Joker 2.0.
All I know is that it looks eerily similar to this:
Noone can prove anything about what influenced HT's direction with Joker 2.0.
All I know is that it looks eerily similar to this:
Shouldn't though since they're based off the same image?
I'm by no means a HT fanboy. If anything I'm a sideshow one but if they used the same image to sculpt it from they should come out looking pretty much the same especially if they really took they're time on it to get it as close as possible. HT may not get it 99% right every time but just b/c this came out looking good we can't say that HT did good for once? We have to say that they got it from Adam just b/c Adam did it first?
If it were just the headsculpt alone I would totally agree with you. But the fact that they went and hired the tailor for the outfit featured in that pic, and also replicated the table and chair set, AND then chose the exact same reference image for the laughing head.
I don't know, somehow I think the factors are all connected
But I am clearly biased seeing as it is my pic, so be that as it may.
Either way i'm delighted they went the direction they did - good for everyone and especially those that desperately wanted a laughing head or Kato's clothing.
HT did good overal this time, what's wrong with that?
At the end I don't care...I'm getting the best mass produced TDK Joker until the 3.0 so I'm happy
Are we back on the Adam connection?
He got burned. Clearly. Lesson to customizers: HT will make what you make for less, so make it now.
How'd he get burned?
He made his laughing head and sold 3 copies, and decided not to sell any more. That was 2 yrs before DX11 was even shown. He's way past the laughing head now
I don't think he really got burned, unless you like the idea of waking up one day and seeing something that looks exactly like what you did done by someone else. But in this hobby, that happens alot. We're all after the same characters.
I'm sure he's fine with it and has moved on. I have. Besides, I said he got plenty of money for the 3 heads to make it worth his while. Weren't they $800 a pop?
Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery
Until it happens to you.
I tried to explain to my girlfriend once that I slept with a girl that reminded me of her. It didn't go down to well.
Anyway, no worries here. Moving along, I'm moving along.
Omg your signature is GENIUS!!!!
Enter your email address to join: