VintijDroidGutzz
Super Freak
It's fine if you don't like them.. but dissing one of the greatest rock bands of all time speaks volumes, sorry.Queen...
It's fine if you don't like them.. but dissing one of the greatest rock bands of all time speaks volumes, sorry.Queen...
No, of course not, but your choice of emoticon doesn't imply that.I dissed them? I'm pretty sure I just expressed my distaste.
If I think the Sucker Punch soundtrack was better music than Highlander's, I get to say so, right?
Is there inherent disrespect in that?
Yep, the movie that totally builded on fanservice is unique in every way... yeeeeey...I enjoyed SP and make no comparisons to anything else. It's unique.
If u don't care u don't post about itAlot of my favorite films are probably scorned by alot of you...and like I care?
Arguing about a film if it is "good" or "awful" is pointless- just go round and round and round with nobody changing anyone's mind.
Just out of genuine curiousity, what do you find stupid, misguided, and sexist about the film? I really have no problem with it not being any given person's cup of tea, I'm just trying to "get" some of the criticisms leveled against it.
Of course its from a male point of view, but i know plenty of girls who really liked this movie and was not offended by it at all, and thousands and thousands of girls all over the world are buying the collectibles and everything from the movie, dressing up like the characters, etc.
im not even going to go there with what girls do or don't fantasize about, we all have our own dreams, everyone is different. And you sort of come off saying girls don't have creative fantasies. I know thats probably not what you meant, but it just comes off that way to me.
I dont feel this movie was trying to offend women in any way, i think it wanted to show an issue about what happened and still happens to women even to this day. A lot of the visuals to me were just metaphors in all the worlds throughout Sucker Punch.
Do girls fantasize about being pretty wearing skimpy outfits, yes i am sure some very much do. Did they in the 1960s? Of course!! Was this movie saying every woman on the planet thinks like this, NO, not at all! Its the story of BabyDoll and what she went through and what she could dream in her mind and how she felt.
as far being abused, her fantasies was a means of escape for her the way I saw it. Snyder tried his best, being a male, to understand and show what a girl of that age is going through and what she might be thinking in her mind. It was the 1960s, but then again i also felt it wasn't, that it could be any time. But showing them all sexy makes people think different about it. they look at the sexy part first. People can get easily offended by anything sexual. Its human nature.
Was it a perfect movie? not at all. But i think it was good. and i think Snyder confused and made people misunderstand the movie. I think people get too caught up in the visuals and the literal meanings of everything.
this is just my opinion of course, i know a lot will disagree with me.
well, you didnt read or understand anything I wrote...
Sideshows newsletter posted that the Mark 2 AU and Batman 89 was coming in 30 days and Fb posted that the city hunter ines were coming out soon.
I think cosmo is reffering to the Hot Toys Community release dates which are taken from hottoys.jp which are listed as Jan, but have changed as each month passed.
I'm still waiting for Sam Flynn, Jake Sully & Babydoll to get released
I'm a female and I did not find the theatrical version sexist.
I'm curious about the extended version now. What can ruin the movie that much that you choose get rid of it?
The most bizarre omission from Sucker Punch’s theatrical cut, though, is Baby Doll’s concluding encounter with the High Roller. In cinemas, the brevity of this scene implied that the Baby Doll had been forced to have sex with the High Roller against her will. Not only did this, when seen in tandem with the lobotomy scene that comes immediately after, give the movie a horribly mean-spirited conclusion, it also reduces Jon Hamm’s role in the film to one brief and utterly baffling moment.
Immediately after Hamm’s doctor delivers the final, lobotomising blow, he leans back and says, “Did you see that look she just gave me?” It’s a line that, in the theatrical cut, meant nothing.
With the offending scene now restored, things make more sense. The High Roller gently woos Baby Doll with a romantic overture worthy of William Shatner, and the heroine acquiesces - she takes fate head on, and accepts it with all the relish she can muster.
Emily Browning bemoaned the removal of this scene many months ago. “I had a very tame and mild love scene with John Hamm,” Browning told Nylon magazine. “I think it's great for this young girl to actually take control of her own sexuality. Well, the MPAA doesn't like that. They don't think a girl should ever be in control of her own sexuality because they're from the Stone Age.”
While Sucker Punch still ends on a dark and enigmatic note, its message is at least clear - by helping Sweet Pea escape, Baby Doll’s achieved her goal, and by calmly accepting what will happen instead of struggling against it, she manages to claw back the morsels of power and dignity that her captors have denied her throughout the film.
I found this article and thought this an interesting point.
https://www.denofgeek.com/movies/1021329/is_the_sucker_punch_extended_cut_better.html
Unless of course Sweet Pea escaping was still part of the fantasy, and then Baby Doll just gave up cause she couldn't cope.
And that's the whole point, they left it for you to decide.
Enter your email address to join: