It's called retconning people. Comic books have been doing it since the '40s.
I hereby retcon Karamazov80.
It's called retconning people. Comic books have been doing it since the '40s.
These were his conceptual designs for Alien I posted showing the life cycle of the creature and on beings who interacted with it.
NOT from the book. If it says ALIEN and gives a date, those were paintings he was commissioned to do for the film after Ridley Scott liked his work in the Necronomicon. You are wrong.
only answer that makes sensei actually see now that abake has already said almost all of it.
well, so let it just be screenshots to his post.
prometheus "engineer" is a cosplay of the space jockey.
We know what retconning is...the point is that Carrotburn is stating as fact that Giger meant for the Jockey to be a suit worn by another being.
There is no proof of that...and in fact...there is alot of proof stating just the opposite.
Of course, with the release of PROMETHEUS, people will want to retcon what the Jockey is (a suit)...but it is not a FACT that this was the case when ALIEN was released, nor is it a fact that Giger designed it as such.
Ergo...Carrotburn is WRONG up until the point PROMETHEUS is released.
It's called retconning people. Comic books have been doing it since the '40s.
Prometheus made $400+ million on a $130 million Budget
the DVD/BlueRay sales were pretty good selling about 1 million copies in 2 months time.
Thank you Internet Police
You're welcome...now move along...nothing more to see here.
Why is EVERY Prometheus thread full of the same BS over & over & over again?...
Why is EVERY Prometheus thread full of the same BS over & over & over again?...
Where's CarrotBun?
I'm truly interested in knowing whether he's finally understood or not.
Why is EVERY Prometheus thread full of the same BS over & over & over again?...
Enter your email address to join: