Re: Hot Toys - Star Wars: The Last Jedi - Luke Skywalker (Force Projection) - CONFIRM
"not as visually striking"? Wor-gar said it better than me:
People keep going around and around on this, but if you as a filmmaker need to get across "wrecked/unusable fighter" in a 2 second shot, you do NOT show what they showed in the movie, which is DEBATABLE what it means. You show a fighter that's missing its wings, crashed/destroyed at the bottom of a cliff - or something like in the artwork.
The artwork isn't more "visually striking" as you say - it is 100% CLEAR that the fighter is unusable. The shot in the movie is NOT CLEAR in this regard. It is therefore deliberate on the part of the filmmakers - there's no way to argue otherwise
No, in the movie frame there isn't a fifth red/crimson hash mark, clearly visible at least. The door is pretty heavily weathered though, so it's not to say it isn't there but just isn't quite visible as its only shown briefly. The door also has part of the chevron and the fighter shown underwater appears to have its chevrons fully intact, at least on the upper side wings (there are markings on the under wings also.)
It doesn't matter anyway because as I said, the fighter that is submerged only has chevrons, no hash marks. So the door's not from the same fighter.
And... as I mentioned several times, this is a "thing" because it's about whether Luke had the option of flying to Crait, meaning he chooses to do the holo-projection thing instead.
One thing that people also don't seem to get is that... in theory... using brief ("non-fatal") sessions of holo-projection, Luke could in fact literally travel anywhere he wanted in the galaxy to do whatever he needed to do without the need for an x-wing fighter anyway. It's a bit like people needing their car less to drive to the mall because they can shop online.
It does open a few issues though - like Ben in ANH simply doing a 60 second holo-projection to Alderaan (or a series of 60 second holo-projections spread over hours to rest) to alert them that Leia had been captured and that he has the death star plans. BUt then... there wouldn't be an OT.
I hope some fan eventually does that as a CGI shot in one of those "fan edits" - it's an amazingly cool idea. It's the Luke coda that was missing for me and perfect way to tie the plot aspect to a fitting/haunting tribute to Luke and how we remember him best. It could have been quite emotional.
I find your two points above to be unpersuasive, since I don't believe Luke would have had spare wings in cargo that were not originally part of his starship. Also, it is plausible that Luke had to cut the wing to fit the doorframe, thereby losing one ID mark.
From what is seen onscreen, I think it is clear that the filmmaker, with two references (the submerged starship and the hut door), was showing that Luke had scuttled his craft, and partially dismantled it. Conclusion? Dude's not going anywhere.
I know that you are disappointed that what was shown onscreen is not as visually striking as what was seen in the artwork for the film, but what was shown was sufficient to convey that Luke had scuttled the craft, meaning that he had no intention of leaving Ahch-To, and no means to do so.
(On a side note: how is everyone pronouncing "Ahch-To"? The way I say it, it sounds like "Botch-toe," but I could be way off base here.)
"not as visually striking"? Wor-gar said it better than me:
But I have to agree that it doesn't look damaged underwater to me at all. Just looks submerged. Deliberate obviously, because making it look like an inoperable wreck would have been really easy.
People keep going around and around on this, but if you as a filmmaker need to get across "wrecked/unusable fighter" in a 2 second shot, you do NOT show what they showed in the movie, which is DEBATABLE what it means. You show a fighter that's missing its wings, crashed/destroyed at the bottom of a cliff - or something like in the artwork.
The artwork isn't more "visually striking" as you say - it is 100% CLEAR that the fighter is unusable. The shot in the movie is NOT CLEAR in this regard. It is therefore deliberate on the part of the filmmakers - there's no way to argue otherwise
It is 100% the Red 5 wing being used for the door. If you watch the movie and freeze frame it when the door is shown you can clearly see the 5 stripes or hash marks. The bottom one has a lot more dirt on it but it is there.
The intent behind the movie is pretty clear, Luke's X-wing is submerged and he used it for parts to make doors and who knows what else on the island. Conclusion the X-wing is toast and he means to stay on the island. There are many more inconsistencies or not clearly explained implications in the OT that easily get overlooked. Why is everyone getting hung up on the X-Wing in TLJ? Don't get me wrong I love that we can have a CIVIL discussion about SW minutiae(especially nowadays with all the negativity) but not sure why this is a thing.
No, in the movie frame there isn't a fifth red/crimson hash mark, clearly visible at least. The door is pretty heavily weathered though, so it's not to say it isn't there but just isn't quite visible as its only shown briefly. The door also has part of the chevron and the fighter shown underwater appears to have its chevrons fully intact, at least on the upper side wings (there are markings on the under wings also.)
It doesn't matter anyway because as I said, the fighter that is submerged only has chevrons, no hash marks. So the door's not from the same fighter.
And... as I mentioned several times, this is a "thing" because it's about whether Luke had the option of flying to Crait, meaning he chooses to do the holo-projection thing instead.
One thing that people also don't seem to get is that... in theory... using brief ("non-fatal") sessions of holo-projection, Luke could in fact literally travel anywhere he wanted in the galaxy to do whatever he needed to do without the need for an x-wing fighter anyway. It's a bit like people needing their car less to drive to the mall because they can shop online.
It does open a few issues though - like Ben in ANH simply doing a 60 second holo-projection to Alderaan (or a series of 60 second holo-projections spread over hours to rest) to alert them that Leia had been captured and that he has the death star plans. BUt then... there wouldn't be an OT.
Thanks. One last shot of Luke's X-Wing in it's "grave" so to speak not only would have clinched the notion that he *had* to project himself (after the big reveal of course) but would have served as a nice curtain call for arguably the second most iconic ship in all of Star Wars.
I hope some fan eventually does that as a CGI shot in one of those "fan edits" - it's an amazingly cool idea. It's the Luke coda that was missing for me and perfect way to tie the plot aspect to a fitting/haunting tribute to Luke and how we remember him best. It could have been quite emotional.