Karamazov, I don't want to step on Deak's toes, but I have to say that yes, Indy does look like how he's photographed. He really does. Sometimes, under certain lighting conditions and maybe during the daytime in general, he could look a little better. But for the most part, what you have seen here is what you get.
However, you've seen many here defend the figure saying that it really doesn't look that bad in real life (like Deak). And because of that, I have to think that your own personal perception will play a HUGE role in what you think of Indy. So my advice is this: wait for a great bargain and get it. If, when you get it, it looks to you just how it does in the pictures, then no loss. You got what you were expecting. But if you happen to see something better in there, then you will be pleasantly surprised.
I do have to admit that looking at my SS Indy standing next to the HT Indy, HT Indy really does look better. I have loved my SS Indy. I have optimized him to a point where I was super happy with it, changing the body to the Pro 1.2, touching up his beard and eyes, getting some HT hands, futzing him, etc. But when I put it next to the HT Indy, I had to begrudgingly admit that HT's still looked better despite the bad likeness (and the little deficiencies here and there).
The real disappointment with this figure is the thought of what could have been, considering how awesome Supes and Jack came out.
Ain't that the truth. 
