RICEaRONI
Super Freak
The older kids could've been used just for the phone call scene.
they are not listed as voice actors.
The older kids could've been used just for the phone call scene.
Shut up asswipe.
But in all serial...that's what the point of the movie was too me. To just end it saying "Oh he woke up. The end" is not what Nolan intended. It's not open and shut like that. It has meaning. That's the meaning of the movie. To appreciate what you have. To not worry all the time. To just live your life without fear, or regret.
Ha! Really? I think I got it a long time ago from the "Just Pictures" thread. Sad that one got closed.
I actually think we agree more that it seems.
I agree that the ending has profound meaning. I hadn't worded it that way, but it does basicaly mean "live without fear or regret." I said that it is about "Faith and letting go of guilt", which has similar implications.
The only area we differ, is in how that message is given weight.
You say that he has learned to not care whether he's dreaming or not and therefore is able to live without fear or regret.
I say that he is finaly confident that reality is in fact reality, now that he has let go of Mal and his guilt, thus finaly able to live without fear or regret.
Either one can work.
...except mine is right.
they are not listed as voice actors.
Ha! Really? I think I got it a long time ago from the "Just Pictures" thread. Sad that one got closed.
I actually think we agree more that it seems.
I agree that the ending has profound meaning. I hadn't worded it that way, but it does basicaly mean "live without fear or regret." I said that it is about "Faith and letting go of guilt", which has similar implications.
The only area we differ, is in how that message is given weight.
You say that he has learned to not care whether he's dreaming or not and therefore is able to live without fear or regret.
I say that he is finaly confident that reality is in fact reality, now that he has let go of Mal and his guilt, thus finaly able to live without fear or regret.
Either one can work.
In fairness ... what about respecting his opinion that you are wrong? Haha.
SnakeDoc
No you are wrong.
The only thing that's lost is your sense of humor.
Lighten up a little. If we don't make our points like we believe we are right we don't have much of a discussion do we.
Just don't take it so seriously.
Irish you've got the shooting script. What's it say in there?
The older kids could've been used just for the phone call scene.
huh? so u can respond to a statement that "you don't get the ending" but i can't? besides, i was initially agreeing with u.
i was purposely slagging those guys off. if any of u had read the review i posted, i made a stand that i wouldn't share what i thought of the meaning of the last scene. cos i'm not interested in being right. there's no "black & white" reading of a film like inception and that's the beauty of it.
maybe i should add a smiley at the end of every post. like so:
No. He's a subconscious projection created by Fisher. The real guy isn't tapped into the dream. The only real people in any of the dreams are Eames, Cobb, the kid from 3rd Rock, Scarecrow, the oriental fella, Kitty Pride and Yusuf. Anyone else is either a forgery (Berenger in dream 1, the blonde girl in dream 2), or a projection.
If you watch a second time, listen for Eames' plan for the inception ... the idea is for Eames to forge the identity of Berenger and plant the inception in the first dream level (the Michael Mann level) so that Fisher's subconscious creates the character by itself for the lower levels. Apparently the oriental fella didn't catch that part ... which is why he started talking to Berenger thinking it was "Eames forging Berenger" in the hotel lobby (a misconception that was quickly countered when Eames came around the corner behind the subconscious projection of Berenger).
SnakeDoc
Yes that's what I mean. Obviously it's not the real guy because he wasn't brought into the dream, but what I meant was, it's still actually him genuinely (even in subconscious form) or rather, it's NOT Eames at that point.
Why would they have needed to cast the younger kids' brothers/sisters for voice work? Three of the four kids have the same last name. It seems clear from the casting that the appearance of the kids mattered. They could've cast any kid for a voice ... but they intentionally cast the older brother and sister of the 3-year-old.
The three-year-old girl ... Claire Geare (she's probably only 18 to 24 months in the picture).
The five-year-old girl ... Taylor Geare.
SnakeDoc
Enter your email address to join: