- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 27,922
- Reaction score
- 31,799
It just to me seems like pretty much anyone other than Hitler would be a major plus, especially a scientist like Voller who 1. would have been carefully psychologically vetted (Nazi membership aside...) by the US government to particpate in Apollo, and 2. doesn't come across as the hypnotic meglomaniac former soldier and master manipulator with an apocalyptic vision Hitler was from the very start. Voller's just a villain, bad guy with a plan.
And you're just speculating about the bomb - that's not in the movie - and the reality is, Hitler didn't slow down the development of the bomb or fumble it due to ineptitude, Germany simply lacked the tech/capablity to do it in time. It was a 1945 technology that Germany would have needed in 1944 or earlier.
So the millions you claim it would have saved isn't really supported by what's in the movie. This to me really comes down to Hilter's obsession with the holocaust, and the imperialist campaigns such as Russia which Hitler totally bungled by personally taking over the running of. These were Hitler's obsessive crazies that diminished Germany's war machine and lost them the war, the things that Voller seems to be indirectly referencing.
Killing Hitler might've resulted in more rational minds running the war, which would've made things tougher for the Allies, particularly later in the war.
It might also have prevented the Final Solution and saved a large proportion of the six million Jewish lives lost.
A more rational leader might not even have wasted valuable resources eliminating the Jews, that would otherwise go to the war effort.
But then Hitler largely took power by building on the fear of Jews, which wasn't a long held core belief of his. It was a pragmatic approach since he thanked the Jewish doctor who tried and failed to save his mother's life.
If Hitler hadn't persecuted the Jews for his own ambition, he might've had use of Jewish scientists and developed the Atom bomb first.
Messing with history brings the butterfly effect. Who knows what the outcome will be? It could be better or worse, so stopping Voller is a problematical scenario for the film.
It might also have prevented the Final Solution and saved a large proportion of the six million Jewish lives lost.
A more rational leader might not even have wasted valuable resources eliminating the Jews, that would otherwise go to the war effort.
But then Hitler largely took power by building on the fear of Jews, which wasn't a long held core belief of his. It was a pragmatic approach since he thanked the Jewish doctor who tried and failed to save his mother's life.
If Hitler hadn't persecuted the Jews for his own ambition, he might've had use of Jewish scientists and developed the Atom bomb first.
Messing with history brings the butterfly effect. Who knows what the outcome will be? It could be better or worse, so stopping Voller is a problematical scenario for the film.
Last edited: