S. Griffin
Super Freak
Updated renders have six stitches on the mask in between the eyes.
Updated renders have six stitches on the mask in between the eyes.
If he plans on doing the tongue out look, I have a hard time believing he’ll opt for mouthplates instead of just a solid sculpt like Mars Riddler.Updated renders have six stitches on the mask in between the eyes.
You just said the opposite on the last page. You're so focused on being a contrarian, you don't seem to be able to make up your mind.If he plans on doing the tongue out look, I have a hard time believing he’ll opt for mouthplates instead of just a solid sculpt like Mars Riddler.
On the movable eyes poll there were a few people saying that they don’t bother with adjusting movable eyes on figures they own that have them. These people genuinely don’t care about display options and realism - they’re going to take Catwoman out of the box, maybe place the whip in her hand (at most), awkwardly prop her up next to the 1989 Batmobile, and call it a day.
Jazzinc Suit is 4-way stretch vinyl, should last a lot longer than pleather or leather. The real suit wasn’t leather anyway. It was latex but latex dries up over time.I'm really worried about the material, if they use pleather or real leather which also eventually cracks it will be a pass for me. But i really want to see more 1/6 figures from Jazzinc, competition is always good.
If it's vinyl, it is the best decision ever made. I think i might grab this depending on the price. Thank you!Yeah, reading those post made me think they just want a statue.
Jazzinc Suit is 4-way stretch vinyl, should last a lot longer than pleather or leather. The real suit wasn’t leather anyway. It was latex but latex dries up over time.
Ok. I said we tried to explain that a sculpt that features rolling eyes will always be better if done correctly.You just said the opposite on the last page. You're so focused on being a contrarian, you don't seem to be able to make up your mind.
Yeah, I didn't disagree, and that ain't what I'm talking aboutOk. I said we tried to explain that a sculpt that features rolling eyes will always be better if done correctly.
He’s the one selling the product, his posts are the ones contradicting, that last statement feels like they’re solid 3D printed sculpts and not swapable, we’re all misguided because a final executive decision hasn’t been made.Yeah, I didn't disagree, and that ain't what I'm talking about
View attachment 711303
View attachment 711302
For now I'll just temper my expectations and wait for the PO to make my final decision.
It is, I just didn't think I'd be saying it for this figure.Always the best advice.
What do you expect really though, JazzInc has always carried themselves as best of the best, most accurate. Now that they’re in a field where they aren’t that, they’ll have to work for it and it’ll be nothing but an uphill battle...
I just don’t want figures north of $300 lacking rolling eyes
That’s been a major point of mine from the beginning no? I prefer rolling eyes on licensed 1:6 products and it appears every other licensed company in the gig does as well, there’s a reason everyone has pretty much ditched painting eyes at mass production level, you’re asking for the dead stare look 100% unless a professional painter is painting every pair of eyes sculpted. It’s not a crime to believe this should feature rolling eyes, screen referenced sculpt, paint apps that hold up to the HT Keaton 2.0, a solid realistic female body that can last a while, you don’t want to ever need to body swap this, and a base that won’t cause a budget cut to the figure in any way.There ya go... that's your real point.
That’s been a major point of mine from the beginning no?
Enter your email address to join: