Justice League Movie (Nov 17th, 2017)

[jye4ever]

Well.......Evilface is lol

I mean if AM is awesome then what? Will they make a movie where he teams up with the JL in that same universe....wait lol

So we’ll then get AM2 yay.

 

[MegaPrime33]

There haven't been any DCU movies that have been awesome, including WW. WW is a stand out because it wasn't terrible, but that doesn't mean it was a great film. WB needs to get out of this universe they so poorly created and start someplace else. They really should just focus on Batman and if that becomes a success then maybe build out that world, slowly, and see where it goes.

 

[jye4ever]

So very true Mega.

WW at best was a middle of the road MCU movie yet some point to it as if that’s the DCEU savior lol

 

[GasparZizou]

I’m not hyped for Aquaman can you help me Gaspar I want to be lol

Buddy, the only ones hype for Aquamomoa are spindrift and Riddick

You know I want that reboot

 

[Khev]

I wonder how many times Zack Snyder has seen IW. I'm pretty sure he still hasn't bothered to watch JL, lol.

 

[jye4ever]

Buddy, the only ones hype for Aquamomoa are spindrift and Riddick

You know I want that reboot

And reboot I don’t mean a carbon copy of the MCU.

Let what works for the MCU remain there.

My question is if AM is more JL or if they went back to full serious again we shall see very soon trailer is almost out.

 

[jye4ever]

I wonder how many times Zack Snyder has seen IW. I'm pretty sure he still hasn't bothered to watch JL, lol.

Hype-Khev is in the house.

Even though I didn’t like JL, BP, RPO, AQP and liked not loved TLJ I am Hype Jye.

Works for me lol

But yes even with its flaws IW is great sue me.

 

[Khev]

RPO is already forgotten but I definitely loved that flick.

 

[Thomascrown17]

Yeah ill watch AoU a million times before I see JL again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[MegaPrime33]

I read on the dark web that watching JL is considered torture in some countries.

 

[jye4ever]

Yeah ill watch AoU a million times before I see JL again.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Especially knowing it leads to IW.

When you watch JL it only leads to Snyder’s twitter posts against the movie lol

 

[a-dev]

And reboot I don’t mean a carbon copy of the MCU.

Let what works for the MCU remain there.

They didn't have to copy the tone of the MCU but they should have copied the overall formula of heroes getting their own movies first and eventually joining up. It quite simply works better. What DC did just feels so half-assed by comparison.

 

[Sweet Rabbit]

It was so FUBAR, it doesn’t qualify as half assed. That would be generous

 

[jye4ever]

They didn't have to copy the tone of the MCU but they should have copied the overall formula of heroes getting their own movies first and eventually joining up. It quite simply works better. What DC did just feels so half-assed by comparison.

Oh no Superman died!

 

[a-dev]

It was so FUBAR, it doesn’t qualify as half assed. That would be generous

Flat-assed? No ass? Or just Ass?

 

[a-dev]

Oh no Superman died!

Exactly.

And who thought it was a good idea to make a film that turns villains into anti-heroes before we ever even saw them be villains? Morons.

 

[The Clown Prince of Crime]

They didn't have to copy the tone of the MCU but they should have copied the overall formula of heroes getting their own movies first and eventually joining up. It quite simply works better. What DC did just feels so half-assed by comparison.

Sounds easy, but the reason they didn't do that is because it's extremely hard to make a good movie that most people enjoy and makes a profit, just so that you can then take those characters and put them in an even bigger team up film. What Marvel pulled off is a miracle. Universal tried that idea twice with the Dracula film and the Tom Cruise Mummy film, and both failed, killing that cinematic universe, after they had announced a new Frankenstein film with Javier Bardem and the Invisible Man with Johnny Depp.

They even took a group pic....

 

[Khev]

Sounds easy, but the reason they didn't do that is because it's extremely hard to make a good movie that most people enjoy and makes a profit, just so that you can then take those characters and put them in an even bigger team up film.

Great point. Terminator tried to kick start a new trilogy *twice* and couldn't even get people to care about even seeing the first movie. Even if a film is astoundingly good like BR 2049 there's no guarantee that they'll find enough of an audience to justify making even one single sequel let alone a 10 or 20 film connected universe. What Marvel did is one of the most amazing accomplishments in film history and it's not even something that anyone else can have guaranteed success with even if they follow the MCU's formula to the letter. It's mind boggling really.

 

[a-dev]

Great point. Terminator tried to kick start a new trilogy *twice*

And they still haven't learned. Third time lucky?

 

[The Clown Prince of Crime]

What is Terminator? Seriously, what is that "universe" about? A machine that takes over the world and tries to win by changing the past. That's not a long term premise, it worked twice because of James Cameron, Arnold in his prime, and the cool special effects, and the overall iconography of the characters, but unless they change or evolve like those Fast & Furious films to the point the franchise becomes something else, I don't see a future, just more of the same with less charismatic actors playing the evil robot role.