batfan08
Super Freak
At the end of the day, I think it's the idea of our society being more "progressive" that is causing it to degrade in a lot of ways. Case in point: violence. I'm not saying to knock your kid's teeth out; that's horrible and abusive, but people have been using corporal punishment to correct their children for thousands of years, and, thus far, it seems to have worked pretty well.
Now, it seems like it's a social taboo just to smack a child on the hind-end if they're being horrible. It's not just parenting, though; I think the whole "non-violence" era we're living in now can be more destructive than not.
Look at all of the shootings and suicides in schools. I'd like to preface this by saying that these are horrible acts of violence that cannot, and should not, be condoned or excused. However, I think that these things are products of escalation in a lot of ways.
My point is that children can be cruel, vindictive little monsters sometimes. Not all of them, mind you, but there are those out there that are. I think we live in a society that leads to a lot of pent-up frustration, and, sometimes, these kids are backed into a corner and the pressure just keeps building and building until, finally, they explode, often leading to collateral damage, as well. I'm not portraying all of these people as victims, mind you, but, rather, some of them as side effects of our "progressive" society.
I genuinely believe that a lot of this stuff is contributing to the degradation of society. How many innocent lives could've been saved, potentially, had some school administration not backed some troubled young person into a corner by not even letting them defend themselves? Granted, not every case is the same, but do you really think these "no tolerance" policies are really contributing anything beneficial? Some of these kids are bullied, and, if they ever stood up for themselves, they could be subject to everything from academic expulsion to legal action taken against them.
I'm sorry to go off in a tangent here, but the moral of the story, I guess, is that, sometimes, the old ways work best.
Now, it seems like it's a social taboo just to smack a child on the hind-end if they're being horrible. It's not just parenting, though; I think the whole "non-violence" era we're living in now can be more destructive than not.
Look at all of the shootings and suicides in schools. I'd like to preface this by saying that these are horrible acts of violence that cannot, and should not, be condoned or excused. However, I think that these things are products of escalation in a lot of ways.
My point is that children can be cruel, vindictive little monsters sometimes. Not all of them, mind you, but there are those out there that are. I think we live in a society that leads to a lot of pent-up frustration, and, sometimes, these kids are backed into a corner and the pressure just keeps building and building until, finally, they explode, often leading to collateral damage, as well. I'm not portraying all of these people as victims, mind you, but, rather, some of them as side effects of our "progressive" society.
I genuinely believe that a lot of this stuff is contributing to the degradation of society. How many innocent lives could've been saved, potentially, had some school administration not backed some troubled young person into a corner by not even letting them defend themselves? Granted, not every case is the same, but do you really think these "no tolerance" policies are really contributing anything beneficial? Some of these kids are bullied, and, if they ever stood up for themselves, they could be subject to everything from academic expulsion to legal action taken against them.
I'm sorry to go off in a tangent here, but the moral of the story, I guess, is that, sometimes, the old ways work best.
Last edited: