Logan (New Wolverine movie March 3rd 2017)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I guarantee you that we won't see a new Wolverine for at least 7-8 years.

You can quote me on that in 2026 as FOX reboots the franchise.

What's an xmen film without wolverine? He's in every movie. He's the front man. He is the xmen!!!!
 
What's an xmen film without wolverine? He's in every movie. He's the front man. He is the xmen!!!!

IMG_2923.JPG
 
Didn't Hugh Jackman say that Fox was already looking for actors to recast him? If Fox goes that long making X-Men films without Wolverine, they deserve to have the rights stripped from them. That would just be stupid not recasting Hugh.



Why do you think in 2026 Fox will reboot the franchise?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What's an xmen film without wolverine? He's in every movie. He's the front man. He is the xmen!!!!

Ummm X-Men First Class? Arguably the best movie in the franchise, he was in it for 5 seconds. He's not needed to make a great film, and but it would be idiotic to think that Cable is such a great character that they would just discard Wolverine.
 
Ummm X-Men First Class? Arguably the best movie in the franchise, he was in it for 5 seconds. He's not needed to make a great film, and but it would be idiotic to think that Cable is such a great character that they would just discard Wolverine.

He was still in the damn movie tho. Like I said. Can't have a xmen movie without wolverine
 
He was still in the damn movie tho. Like I said. Can't have a xmen movie without wolverine

You also said he's the frontman and he is the X-Men, that movie is proof that isn't true at all. Take his cameo out of that movie and it doesn't change a thing. That's my point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I guarantee you that we won't see a new Wolverine for at least 7-8 years.

You can quote me on that in 2026 as FOX reboots the franchise.
I don't know if this warrants an ALF laugh, or a Charleton Heston planet of the apes laugh. I will dwell on this before making a final decision.
Dear Fox,

Please have X-23 travel back in time and dedicate the movie, especially that part, to Karamazov.
He's suffering from EPD (Explosive Projectile Diarrhea) and it's his dying wish.

Thanks.

Your Dark Lord and Master,

Darth Snoopy
Dark Beagle of the Sith









:monkey3







Oh hell no. That happens. . .and it's online petition time. I hate to pull out the big guns, but if they force my hand. . .
 
You also said he's the frontman and he is the X-Men, that movie is proof that isn't true at all. Take his cameo out of that movie and it doesn't change a thing. That's my point.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Meh yea that movie was good and all but didnt it make not as much money? Wolverine is the face of xmen . A movie without him feels odd. In first class you sorta knew he'd show up one way or another.
 
Meh yea that movie was good and all but didnt it make not as much money? Wolverine is the face of xmen . A movie without him feels odd. In first class you sorta knew he'd show up one way or another.

The movie about the same as the first Captain America movie did because it was coming off two horrible X-Men films, and starred mostly unknown actors.
 
During a recent appearance at the Recode Media Conference, 20th Century Fox chairman Stacey Snider revealed that Logan's R-rated "intensity" caused no small amount of handwringing behind closed studio doors.


Said Snider (as quoted by The Playlist):


"Inside, there was real consternation about the intensity of the tone of the film. It’s more of an elegy about life and death. The paradigm for it was a Western, and my colleagues were up in arms. It’s not a wise-cracking cigar-chomping mutton-sporting Wolverine, and the debate internally became, isn’t that freakin’ boring? Isn’t it exciting to imagine Wolverine as a real guy and he’s world-weary and he doesn’t want to fight anymore until a little girl needs him?”


This is, quite frankly, music to our ears. It's also unsurprising, given everything we've heard about Logan's content. From head-stabs to ripped throats to Professor X dropping F-bombs with wild abandon, all signs point to this being the no-holds-barred Wolverine movie we've always wanted to see. Of course this is the sort of thing Snider will be saying in the lead-up to the film's release - this is classic studio hype in action - but in this case, we're inclined to take it at face value.
 
They should save the costume for the inevitable re-cast Wolverine (and they better not have plans to replace his character altogether with a time traveling X-23. . .or Fox can expect to receive a VERY sternly written letter of opposition from yours truly). Bring in a newer, younger, shorter guy. Introduce him wearing the suit, so it's what we all expect from the get-go. Go back to the personality he had in the comic through the '70s-'80s. Use him purely as a member of the X-Men team, no more or less significant than the others, and certainly not the star of the films. And you can breathe another 15-20 years of life into this franchise.

There can be too much of a good thing.
Okay, I wouldn't want to see a short Wolverine. Tom Hardy's height is perfect, and he's not short. If they had someone shorter, it would look awkward on screen. I think 5ft 9in is the perfect height.

Tom hardy once said, "I'm not big enough to be the Punisher, I'm 5'9!" I wish they give him the Wolverine role. I think he would like it.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't want to see a short Wolverine.
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

Short and ugly Wolverine is MANDATORY next time! You hear? No taller than 5'5" otherwise we riot.

Young Bob Hoskins if possible, genetic tech is capable of rejuvenating him now, make it so.

2014-05-02_114014_th.jpg
 
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeh

Short and ugly Wolverine is MANDATORY next time! You hear? No taller than 5'5" otherwise we riot.

Young Bob Hoskins if possible, genetic tech is capable of rejuvenating him now, make it so.

2014-05-02_114014_th.jpg

Do you have someone other than Bob Hoskins in mind who is 5ft 5in tall? Scott Caan maybe? I heard somone else mention his name before. He's 5ft 6in i think.

Sent from my SM-N910S using Tapatalk
 
Logan isn't really ugly, just short :lol

He's hairy, but so is Jackman...by today's standards anyway.

Just get a short muscular guy, who doesn't shave his body like Khev's boy, Chris Evans.
 
Back
Top