Logan (New Wolverine movie March 3rd 2017)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Why do you want him in Deadpool 2 so badly? I don't get it.

Deadpool 2 is set during the heyday of the X-Men alluded to in Logan that we've only seen via Colossus and Negasonic in DP1. It makes perfect sense to feature them there in said heyday.

Again, Stewart's already in talks and Jackman will absolutely do it so these back and forth arguments are ****ing pointless.

You don't have to watch DP2 lol
 
I think to want Hugh Jackman to return just so he can wear a stupid costume shows how ridiculous the smelly man-babies really are when it comes to these superhero movies.

Logan was a fine ending for Jackman. He shouldn't return, same for Stewart.

Just bring in a new actor for Wolverine and introduce him in Deadpool, then possibly use him in X-Force, or just retire the character, I really don't care anymore. Logan is the final superhero movie that I see myself actually being excited for and really enjoying, hopefully I'm wrong and some decent stuff starts getting made from the MCU, DCEU, and Fox. Nothing coming up looks all that great.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Jackman talking to FOX executive footage.

 
He looked puzzled to me, not to mention he fired his rifle at Logan. But yeah, there's that too (which is just as tragic if not more so).

Yeah, he did. I just got the sense that it was more of a "why?" thing than him thinking he was X-24.
 
Deadpool 2 is set during the heyday of the X-Men alluded to in Logan that we've only seen via Colossus and Negasonic in DP1. It makes perfect sense to feature them there in said heyday.

Again, Stewart's already in talks and Jackman will absolutely do it so these back and forth arguments are ****ing pointless.

You don't have to watch DP2 lol

Didn't Stewart just say he's finished with the character?

Where did you hear he's in talks to return?

Jackman talking to FOX executive footage.



:lol :lol :lol
 
Deadpool 2 is set during the heyday of the X-Men alluded to in Logan that we've only seen via Colossus and Negasonic in DP1. It makes perfect sense to feature them there in said heyday.

Again, Stewart's already in talks and Jackman will absolutely do it so these back and forth arguments are ****ing pointless.

You don't have to watch DP2 lol



So that means that not only will Logan/Wolverine and Charles Xavier be in a world where they're the butt of jokes about how they're fictional (and that it's all just a Hollywood movie), but they'll also exist in a world where this has happened,


IMG_6506.JPG


Ew. Now it really doesn't make sense.


Yeah Stewart is now babbling about about returning lol


After just saying during the Logan promotions that Logan was a good time to stop. :lol
 
So that means that not only will Logan/Wolverine and Charles Xavier be in a world where they're the butt of jokes about how they're fictional (and that it's all just a Hollywood movie), but they'll also exist in a world where this has happened,


View attachment 328803


Ew. Now it really doesn't make sense.

Nope, that was the old timeline.
 
I hope Jackman and Stewart don't return to any films. It's part of what makes this movie so special... they are exiting on a high note.

I personally don't care if we don't see any of the original X-Men actors anymore... i'd be happy with:

- Deadpool / X -force films with Cable, Domino, Colossus, and anybody else they decide to add (I think Gambit should tie into these films)
- X-Men films with McCavoy, Fassbender, and the new cast from Apocalypse
- New Mutants with the rumored cast and characters, could be set in same time as Deadpool but completely different stories...
 
I think to want Hugh Jackman to return just so he can wear a stupid costume shows how ridiculous the smelly man-babies really are when it comes to these superhero movies.

Do you even like X-Men comics? lol I'm all but convinced that you've never read one.
 
Nope, that was the old timeline.

We've been through this rodeo before, the timelines in these movies don't make sense and are a jumbled up, contradicting mess. None of them add up.

"But muh Timeline B"

The events of Wolverine Origins would still have to occur since he's always been "James Howlett". The only change is that DOFP's 1973 or whatever eliminates Ryan Reynolds and the three mile island thing. In fact, Charles Xavier should look like Patrick Stewart and not be a cripple in the 1980s. :lol


I hope Jackman and Stewart don't return to any films. It's part of what makes this movie so special... they are exiting on a high note.

I personally don't care if we don't see any of the original X-Men actors anymore... i'd be happy with:

- Deadpool / X -force films with Cable, Domino, Colossus, and anybody else they decide to add (I think Gambit should tie into these films)
- X-Men films with McCavoy, Fassbender, and the new cast from Apocalypse
- New Mutants with the rumored cast and characters, could be set in same time as Deadpool but completely different stories...



This.

Or hell, if you gotta have Wolverine in there, just do what they did with Colossus and remake the character from the ground up.
 
We've been through this rodeo before, the timelines in these movies don't make sense and are a jumbled up, contradicting mess. None of them add up.

"But muh Timeline B"

The events of Wolverine Origins would still have to occur since he's always been "James Howlett". The only change is that DOFP's 1973 or whatever eliminates Ryan Reynolds and the three mile island thing. In fact, Charles Xavier should look like Patrick Stewart and not be a cripple in the 1980s. :lol

That's why my headcanon is that they're the ramblings and confused recollections of an alzheimer's ridden Professor Xavier. It makes sense precisely because they don't!:lol
 
There's nothing wrong with wanting faithful adaptations of these characters. The costumes are a huge part of their iconography. I only forgive Singer for the black X-Suits because he had to resurrect a genre that Schumacher killed in the 90s.
 
Do you even like X-Men comics? lol I'm all but convinced that you've never read one.

I've read the important ones when I was younger but I don't remember much, nor care about superheroes anymore. I think they're all ridiculous, but I do think there's enough source material for a filmmaker to use and elevate those stories in live action like The great superhero movies have done. Unfortunately the MCU is giving the comic book nerds all the costumes they want, no need to give them a decent story. Actually, why aren't you a MCU fan? They have all the costumes you need.

What would you rather see, a Joss Whedon Batman movie or a David Fincher Batman movie? Whedon' movie will probably be a lot closer to the comics, but I'd take a new perspective on Batman from a great filmmaker like Fincher.

Logan is a far better story than Old Man Logan, but the smelly man-babies just want to see Logan in a world with inbred Hulks, Red Skull and Hawkeye.
 
This.

Or hell, if you gotta have Wolverine in there, just do what they did with Colossus and remake the character from the ground up.

I think Deadpool is the new Wolverine... like it or not. He's the new star the films will center around.

They would be smart to bring in X-23 as Wolverine in the current storyline and have Cable time travel and bring an older girl back for X-Force or Deadpool 2.

The current films with young xavier and magneto can focus on the mutants who got the shaft in the original trilogy: cyclops, jean, storm, nightcrawler, etc. I think people would be happy to see them shine for once.
 
I've read the important ones when I was younger but I don't remember much, nor care about superheroes anymore. I think they're all ridiculous, but I do think there's enough source material for a filmmaker to use and elevate those stories in live action like The great superhero movies have done. Unfortunately the MCU is giving the comic book nerds all the costumes they want, no need to give them a decent story. Actually, why aren't you a MCU fan? They have all the costumes you need.

What would you rather see, a Joss Whedon Batman movie or a David Fincher Batman movie? Whedon' movie will probably be a lot closer to the comics, but I'd take a new perspective on Batman from a great filmmaker like Fincher.

Logan is a far better story than Old Man Logan, but the smelly man-babies just want to see Logan in a world with inbred Hulks, Red Skull and Hawkeye.

You're not making a good argument for why Wolverine's costume is a bad thing. At all.

The Dark Knight is a perfect movie and Batman is in costume all throughout it.
 
Back
Top