gibby
Super Freak
Very true. If their rotation stays healthy, they should be there in the end.
Major League Baseball 2011
- Thread starter FLOSI
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Very true. If their rotation stays healthy, they should be there in the end.
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
Do some research.
Most picked the Reds and Brewers to finish ahead of the Cards with a healthy rotation. Once Wainwright was injured, their projections lowered.
I'm sure most people didn't think Cleveland would be a "powerhouse," either.
What MLB analysts picked the Cards to finish "near the bottom" of the division like you stated?
You sound pretty mad, a simple question really ruffled your feathers huh?
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
What MLB analysts picked the Cards to finish "near the bottom" of the division like you stated?
You sound pretty mad, a simple question really ruffled your feathers huh?
Is something wrong with you? Mentally, I mean?
Is something wrong with you? Mentally, I mean?
Was that question too confusing for you?
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
Was that question too confusing for you?
I've seen you "debate" on these forums before.
Sorry, not going there, keyboard warrior.
I just told you to do some research. If you spent half as much time working on your logic, as you do trolling this thread, you could've google'd some info.
Here's one link:
https://www.mlbbaseballfreepicks.com/st-louis-cardinals-predictions/
Now don't read it, cause you're a douche, and go about your business.
It picked the Cards to finish 4th after the Waino, injury. Is that "near the bottom" enough for you?
I've seen you "debate" on these forums before.
Sorry, not going there, keyboard warrior.
I just told you to do some research. If you spent half as much time working on your logic, as you do trolling this thread, you could've google'd some info.
Here's one link:
https://www.mlbbaseballfreepicks.com/st-louis-cardinals-predictions/
Now don't read it, cause you're a douche, and go about your business.
It picked the Cards to finish 4th after the Waino, injury. Is that "near the bottom" enough for you?
After "doing some research" I found that SIX Espn analysts actually picked the Cardinals to WIN the division. But you can feel free to keep making things up as you go
https://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/preview/2011/news/story?page=11expertpicks
LOL @ your source "MLB baseball free picks". What a clown GTFO
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
After "doing some research" I found that SIX Espn analysts actually picked the Cardinals to WIN the division. But you can feel free to keep making things up as you go
https://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/preview/2011/news/story?page=11expertpicks
LOL @ your source "MLB baseball free picks". What a clown GTFO
Did you count the number of analysts on the page, douche? 45. 45 of them.
SIX out of FORTY FIVE.
Six out of forty five people picked the Cards to win in a division of 6.
And who knows how many of them sent their picks in before Waino's injury at the end of spring training.
Would you like me to do a statistical analysis for you as well? LMAO.
Last edited:
This site looks legit, I can see all the Vegas odds makers bookmarking this as we speak:
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
After looking again, more people picked the Reds and the Brewers by FAR over the Cards.
The Astros even got a few votes, as did the Cubs.
Try again, troll.
The Astros even got a few votes, as did the Cubs.
Try again, troll.
After looking again, more people picked the Reds and the Brewers by FAR over the Cards.
The Astros even got a few votes, as did the Cubs.
Try again, troll.
Ofc more people picked the Reds & Brew Crew, did you not watch MLB in 2010 or did you not have the operation to remove your head from your arse yet?
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
Here's one from the Sporting News. Is that better, douche?
https://aol.sportingnews.com/mlb/feed/2011-01/mlb-2011/story/st-louis-cardinals-preview
1. Adam Wainwright's loss will be costly. With then-ace Chris Carpenter injured in 2007 and 2008, the Cardinals finished third and fourth in the NL Central. Without Wainwright, who had surpassed Carpenter as staff ace, they face a similar fate in a division that looks much improved since last year.
Now go to bed.
https://aol.sportingnews.com/mlb/feed/2011-01/mlb-2011/story/st-louis-cardinals-preview
1. Adam Wainwright's loss will be costly. With then-ace Chris Carpenter injured in 2007 and 2008, the Cardinals finished third and fourth in the NL Central. Without Wainwright, who had surpassed Carpenter as staff ace, they face a similar fate in a division that looks much improved since last year.
Now go to bed.
One source is all you got for me? What happened to "most analysts"?
Keep back pedaling clown, the circus is in town!"Do some research"
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
One source is all you got for me? What happened to "most analysts"?
"Do some research"
I gave you two sources. You want me to do all the work for you? What, do you want a works' cited page, too?
You disagreed with my comment, kiddo. You do the research.
And who's backpedaling? Do you even know what that means?
I gave you TWO SOURCES that SUPPORTED MY OPINION.
That means there are at least TWO other people that share my thoughts on the Cards' projections for this season.
Two people that are far more intelligent in the realm of baseball then you. Two people that get paid for it.
There are PLENTY more out there, but I have better things to do than give you a list of 25 sites.
You want more, find them yourself. Create a works' cited page when you're done. You homework is due tomorrow.
LOL, this first "source" you posted is just too rich
This is what you consider a "source"?
A gambling site that gladly takes money from suckers like you who can't tell their ass from their elbow and probably never played an inning of baseball after Little League?
Hilarious! Color me impressed!
This is what you consider a "source"?
A gambling site that gladly takes money from suckers like you who can't tell their ass from their elbow and probably never played an inning of baseball after Little League?
Hilarious! Color me impressed!
The good - if there was going to be a break in the arm, that may have been the best place to have it. If it would have been the wrist, you're looking at displaced and out for the entire year and then some.
Also, Freese and Craig both coming back soon. Should be enough to plug the hole until Pujols is back.
The bad - not sure if you caught this, but it sounds like they only performed a CT scan and not an MRI. The quote from the PD was that "The team said in a news release that Pujols' shoulder is sore, but no structural damage was found "at this time." Guess they don't remember 2005 all that well.
Right the wrist is a major issue. You mess that up and that 4-6 week goes into 8-12 weeks. He'll be back and help the cards out his numbers will finally not be great. Ten years of doing it had to come to an end someday.
I saw that. The shoulder is probably fine but I hope they do their jobs and get it checked.
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
LOL, you really have nothing. That's why you keep harping on the same thing.
More work done for you, douche.
Here's Sports' Illustrated:
https://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/baseball/mlb/si-mlb-2011-season-preview/index.html
Projected 4th in the Central.Any other major publications you want to run through?
Your ESPN link backed my statement.
Sporting News backed it.
Sports' Illustrated backed it.
Even the smaller sites you're having a coronary over backs it.
I'm done with this topic, especially since anyone reading this thread can clearly see you're a child.
You want to discuss this further(and if you need even MORE links) we can go to pm. Although, I think I've spent 20 minutes more on this topic than need be. Keep trollin' baby.
More work done for you, douche.
Here's Sports' Illustrated:
https://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2011/baseball/mlb/si-mlb-2011-season-preview/index.html
Projected 4th in the Central.Any other major publications you want to run through?
Your ESPN link backed my statement.
Sporting News backed it.
Sports' Illustrated backed it.
Even the smaller sites you're having a coronary over backs it.
I'm done with this topic, especially since anyone reading this thread can clearly see you're a child.
You want to discuss this further(and if you need even MORE links) we can go to pm. Although, I think I've spent 20 minutes more on this topic than need be. Keep trollin' baby.
SI? They picked the Mets to win the '09 World Series
My ESPN link destroyed your statement, and your first source being a gambling site for dummies is absolutely humiliating.
Just quit while your behind man, or you can keep posting other gambling sites & calling me names like it's going to help you win this argument
Oh btw, which of these is your guy?
My ESPN link destroyed your statement, and your first source being a gambling site for dummies is absolutely humiliating.
Just quit while your behind man, or you can keep posting other gambling sites & calling me names like it's going to help you win this argument
Oh btw, which of these is your guy?
NosferatuBill36
Super Freak
SI? They picked the Mets to win the '09 World Series
My ESPN link destroyed your statement, and your first source being a gambling site for dummies is absolutely humiliating.
Just quit while your behind man, or you can keep posting other gambling sites & calling me names like it's going to help you win this argument
Sports' Illustrated, The Sporting News, ESPN(which supported my statement, you math genius, you) > You. Hell, even the gambling site is more professional than you.
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
Nice edit, by the way! You're very angry!
lmao
Sports' Illustrated, The Sporting News, ESPN(which supported my statement, you math genius, you) > You. Hell, even the gambling site is more professional than you.
Denial is not a river in Egypt.
ESPN analysts picking the Cards to win the division doesn't support your statement
SI = a joke
MLB handicappers = a bigger joke
Nice fail quotation btw, you're very MAD
Similar threads
