Re: The Man of Steel
I don't believe Zod was ever in the Superman animated series.
Don't blame Dave, he thought Natalie Portman was in A New Hope.
In his defense though Jax-Ur was in the animated series and it was admitted it was a combination of that character and Zod most specifically from the Superman films.
More to the point they will be asking is Superman worth investing in past the year 2013? Because it's WB who are likely to secure copyrights for themselves and DC. Sometime between now and the copyright transfer in 2013 WB will need to decide if they are going to write a BIG DAMN CHECK to buy Superman.
They've basically admitted that the issue with WB is cash and they've said that both families feel that WB is actively trying to keep Superman off the big screen. One of the stipulations of the rights reverting was that WB have a Superman film by December 2013...Also WB has offered to buy Superman, that isn't what they want, they want the funds from leasing it.
That means the end of Superman as we know him. Superman Issue 1 will revert fully back to the heirs of his creators. Yet certain aspects of the character remain the property of DC comics. His modern powers. His post issue 1 costumes. The "S". His villains. 70 years of stories and backstory and evolution of the character.
Not as clearcut as this but a good summary, there was a huge thread on these boards about it....too lazy to look for it.
And once the copyright transfers over the DC universe will then need to re-con Superman away.
They've already taken steps to achieve this, hence the planet Daxum which is basically Krypton. Sodam Yat from Daxum is basically Superman with a Green Lantern ring. Hell the Daxumites were at direct odds with the New Kryptonians. One Superboy Prime punch, bad pun intended, and they could meld the two without much issue. Superman would still be Superman, they could even use the "S" and even call him "Super-Man" and still not violate trademarks or even one of his nicknames. DC has taken steps to do so if they had to, even though they two the line that they aren't...it's very visible.
So the new movie needs to put butts in seats. This movie needs to be a hit so WB understands this is still a valuable corporate investment. Superman needs an ace in the hole. He needs to fight his most recognized foe besides Luthor. And that's Zod.
You are being shortsighted. Superman's earning powers are not based in film alone. He is a cashbox full from merchandising, animated features, toys, etc even with a string of horrible films. Trust me DC/WB want Superman despite not having him on the big screen, his earning potential far outweighs it. This film will not decide WB's interest in the character.
But Superman in issue 1 leaps. He cannot fly. His powers are a shadow of what they evolved into over 70 years. If Superman changes ownership WB/DC will be watching like hawks that their contributions to the character are no longer used. I'm all for creator's rights, and Siegal and Shuster were screwed over the years. But as a Superman fan I feel like lawyers are going to tear the character in half.
If Superman is shopped to another company they'd get the original costume color scheme, the origin and I believe Lois, Perry and a couple loose villains. No other company would want to deal with WB so they'd definitely try to have a new stamp that'd be a seller simply because people would want to see if it could work.
I have absolutely know idea about what is going on with the Superman copyright, but if WB loses it, could Disney/Marvel potentially pick it up?
Yes, although the families probably wouldn't want it there. It's about cash, rights is at the roots and I'm sure some of that is there but in reality they are fighting over the bottom dollar. So the families are going to want Superman to go somewhere where he'd be a star meaning that they'd probably look at B level Comic Book companies where he could be the lynchpin and be focused on instead at Marvel where he'd be around already established heroes and they've already got three different Superman styled characters.
Wherever he goes the rights agreements would be stiff requiring films, media, comics and merchandising which many lower companies might not be able to do.
Mark my words in 2014 Superman will still be at DC and WB without a problem, this is all posturing from the families side to get more.