Masters of the Universe Classics

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I don't think this was really possible. The sheath already looks bigger on the toy than in the cartoon and his sword seems about the right size. To completely fit the power sword the sheath would have been massive and not looked very good. I think this is just a case where animation doesn't always translate very well.

Yep, the animation had several issues with scale and perspective that cannot be fully translated in a 3D realistic way...
Besides, and this is personal opinion, it's safe to say most people will display He-Man with the sword in hand I think

I agree with that, but there are other ways to create the same effect. Example, this Trunks figure comes with a sword and sheath

ZUUtg9q.jpg


However, like the He Man figure, the full sword does not fit inside the sheath, so it comes with two swords, a fully complete sword for the figure to hold, and a shorter version which fits inside the sheath to create the illusion that a complete sword fits inside.

OhiyTiG.jpg

That's pretty cool, but comparing a Japanese toy with an American one is like apples and oranges

That option for the sword works but it's not something that was ever going to happen. This sub was always going to be as minimal as possible.

As for reviewers needing to do a better job...I don't think that's fair or required. They are stating how they feel. If you feel different then feel free to make your own. But no reviewer is obligated to point out anything. Not everyone will have the same issues.

No kidding, some people are more obsessive over certain little things and the reviews are always a matter of personal opinion, regardless of them getting a free figure or not...

And Eamon, ever since the beginning of MOTUC all the figures have had a shinier look than the 4H protons because they use flat/matte paints vs. production plastic from Mattel
Also, remember stoned He-Man? There's always been little issues here and there with the figures... Reversed shoulders, lacking paint-apps, black plastic, loose ankles, etc.
I think it's unfair to say that all of the sudden there's a drop in quality just because of one figure.
Besides, despite the awful ankles, this He-Man is way more stable than many of the previous figures...
 
Just realized my Filmation He-Man has a worn box. Thats really a little annoying to me. Will have to trade it out. Matty customer service hopefully will fix this.

I agree on the quality issues. I have had really too mamy issues lately (2up He-Man, 2.0 Teela, Filmation He-Man - to name a few) and I still habe to open most of my recently received figures. However it is usually no big issue for me. In fact I enjoy touching up the figures where needed. I like "customizing" these figures a little. At the moment I am even toying with the idea to replace all those stupid plastic capes with real fabric ones...
 

I think reviews should be to inform the public, otherwise there's no point in making them. Just because a reviewer doesn't have a problem with what some will consider an issue, doesn't mean they shouldn't point it out. A good reviewer will know what may or may not be construed as a possible issue with some fans, and will always point it out regardless of their opinion.
 
I think reviews can be critical and have been but this was something I was annoyed to see not being mentioned.

I for one would pose my Filiation He-Man not holding his sword and have it on his back. Filmation He-Man rarely used it. He didn't have a sword on the cover of the Panini Sticker album which is an image that stayed with me a 'this version'.
But I cannot do that now as the sword sticks out over his head and just looks stupid.
 
Can anyone tell me the best place to currently get the He man 2.0 for a reasonable price as the current Ebay prices are crazy.
 
We know they would be minimal due to the nature of the design but minimal on paint apps like the sword is cutting a corner at the behest of those who buy it.



I did just make my own review right here and I think its' fair and required to expect reviewers to point out inaccuracies or things that fall short. That's kinda the point.
The sword is inaccurate and lacks the colors we were advertised and the scabbard is also inaccurate and is not like the cartoon which is the whole point of this line. I don't think I am asking too much for reviewers to be a little more observant.

The point I was making is that because you think it "falls short" doesn't mean they do. They are not required to do anything. Or point out anything. These are not any independent or official reviews. It's some persons opinion. There is no right or wrong. The sword/scabbard issue is a perfect example. I see it differently then you. So should I say your a poor reviewer and this or that because we have different opinions on what's correct? Should I be telling you your opinion on your review is wrong? It is your review, I don't see any reason why what I feel should be in your, or anyone else's review. The whole point is for the Reviewer to give their opinion. That's it. If they don't do what you (or anyone else) wants so what.
 
I think reviews should be to inform the public, otherwise there's no point in making them. Just because a reviewer doesn't have a problem with what some will consider an issue, doesn't mean they shouldn't point it out. A good reviewer will know what may or may not be construed as a possible issue with some fans, and will always point it out regardless of their opinion.

No, the point is for them to give their opinion. It's not their job to know what every person may or may not want to know. Man, everyone's gotta find fault with everything. There where reviews that showed the sword, and every other thing with the figure.
 
No, the point is for them to give their opinion. It's not their job to know what every person may or may not want to know. Man, everyone's gotta find fault with everything. There where reviews that showed the sword, and every other thing with the figure.

Obviously a review consists of the reviewer's opinion, but if someone is going to step up to the plate and proclaim themselves as a toy reviewer, then it is their job to know what people may or may not like about the item in question. They need to go into all the details of the item being reviewed. If someone wants to simply post their opinion of a figure, they can do it on a forum.
 
Can anyone tell me the best place to currently get the He man 2.0 for a reasonable price as the current Ebay prices are crazy.

MattyCollector in the future. It may be a while but I would be shocked if Mattel doesn't reissue this figure sometime down the road.
 
The point I was making is that because you think it "falls short" doesn't mean they do. They are not required to do anything. Or point out anything. These are not any independent or official reviews. It's some persons opinion. There is no right or wrong. The sword/scabbard issue is a perfect example. I see it differently then you. So should I say your a poor reviewer and this or that because we have different opinions on what's correct? Should I be telling you your opinion on your review is wrong? It is your review, I don't see any reason why what I feel should be in your, or anyone else's review. The whole point is for the Reviewer to give their opinion. That's it. If they don't do what you (or anyone else) wants so what.

The sword not looking like cartoon version and the sword not fitting into the scabbard is not just me saying it falls short, that is just flat out falling short. If you are happy with lesser standards then that is your problem but to suggest that these glaring issues are just my own personal opinion when others agree is both ludicrous and looks a bit like willfull blindness.
This is a Filmation line, therefore it not at all unreasonable for me to expect that we get a figure at this price that reuses so many parts that it be accurate and look like they should.
It is not my opinion that the sword does not look like the sword in the cartoon, is but a reuse of a previous sword and has no paint apps as previously advertised.
Is it not my opinion that the sword does not fit into the scabbard as it should and sticks out over his head which again, is not accurate to the cartoon.

44-14-Thanks-He-Man-626x480.jpg

Is also worth pointing out that these reviewers are send these items for free to promote said items. These reviewers also don't shy away from taking credit for helping sales. If they can do that they they can also take some flack for missing something so obvious.
If you are happy with reviewers missing something that others would not and did not, again by all means be content with less. Others are not so easily won over and you should not taking such issue with the legitimate grievance of others.
I agree that folks can make silly or unrealistic complaints but this is not one of those occasions.
 
The Classics Teela they have showing up on the mattycollector website - do you think its a glitch or they are possibly going to finally reissue her ?

I would guess it is just a mistake and they grabbed the wrong Teela for the photo. They haven't done a second run of a figure in a long time and with a Filmation Teela possibly coming in the future, I can't imagine they would now.
 
The sword not looking like cartoon version and the sword not fitting into the scabbard is not just me saying it falls short, that is just flat out falling short. If you are happy with lesser standards then that is your problem but to suggest that these glaring issues are just my own personal opinion when others agree is both ludicrous and looks a bit like willfull blindness.
This is a Filmation line, therefore it not at all unreasonable for me to expect that we get a figure at this price that reuses so many parts that it be accurate and look like they should.
It is not my opinion that the sword does not look like the sword in the cartoon, is but a reuse of a previous sword and has no paint apps as previously advertised.
Is it not my opinion that the sword does not fit into the scabbard as it should and sticks out over his head which again, is not accurate to the cartoon.

View attachment 249363

Is also worth pointing out that these reviewers are send these items for free to promote said items. These reviewers also don't shy away from taking credit for helping sales. If they can do that they they can also take some flack for missing something so obvious.
If you are happy with reviewers missing something that others would not and did not, again by all means be content with less. Others are not so easily won over and you should not taking such issue with the legitimate grievance of others.
I agree that folks can make silly or unrealistic complaints but this is not one of those occasions.

Honestly Eamon,
Here's the issue with your rationale, if the sword needs to sit lower, then the scabbard needs to be a bit longer and sit lower like in the pic you posted, that causes also issues with limiting the figure from riding Battle-Cat or sitting on the Wind Raider. Now if it were the opposite and it sits higher, then it would stick out way to much above the shoulder and it's not "screen accurate" and might not work if He-Man wants to "grab" the sword as the muscular arm wouldn't bend enough to do so.

Now, the bigger issue is that sometimes 2D doesn't translate that good into 3D, and a prime example is some of the PCS statues, what looks good on paper or cels, doesn't really work on a 3D figure. Some compromise has to be made to make this work.

It's not the perfect solution for everyone, but I see more people happy with the figure than unhappy.

There's always room for improvement and that's why they are customizers and custom accessories. Heck, even high end statues and figures like SS and Hot Toys get customized all the time.

But some people forget that there's dozens of variables when it comes to producing a figure, including raw materials, budget, timeline, design, molds, factory capabilities, and a long etc.

Now as you said these are "facts", but you also have to understand that some people don't mind these and are seeing the big picture. And assuming your standards are the ones by which everything should be measured is both naive and a bit arrogant.

Finally, the fact that you are so bothered by this issue that you would even go after the reviewers is a bit of an overreaction IMO. But to each it's own, you are entitled to your opinion like everyone else, but understand that a review, no matter how detailed, will never and cannot be objective since it's all a matter of opinion. You see it all the time with movie, book, theater and product reviews.
:duff

Anyway, cannot wait for Skeletor to be paired with He-Man!
 
But some people forget that there's dozens of variables when it comes to producing a figure, including raw materials, budget, timeline, design, molds, factory capabilities, and a long etc.

Now as you said these are "facts", but you also have to understand that some people don't mind these and are seeing the big picture. And assuming your standards are the ones by which everything should be measured is both naive and a bit arrogant.

Budget, raw materials, timeline, etc. have been and always will be cop out corporate excuses for not producing the product properly. I think it's amazing that people still buy into all the mumbo jumbo that's being fed to us by toy companies year after year. The products are poorly designed because the company is too cheap to hire people who know how do do it right. Besides cost cutting, it's a serious matter of ineptitude.

As far as fans/customers being okay with the final product, that's part of the problem. Those are the people who essentially set a precedent for Mattel to produce a lower quality item. A toy company is not going to fix the problems when they see that customers will buy it no matter how it comes out.

The sad thing is, many fans do see the problems, but are in denial and pretend everything is just fine with the products because they don't want any negativity hindering their love affair with plastic toy collecting. Then you have the rare breed of collectors who see the problems, embrace reality, and stop buying it because it's crap, or buy it knowing they can customize it and make it better than stock.

At any rate, The bottom line is some reviewers get free toys and choose not to critique a product where it needs to be critiqued, because they don't want to piss off the companies who then might halt providing the free toys. Sorry, that goes beyond personal opinion of the product, it's common sense, and to a degree unethical. Some of these reviewers should be called out.
 
Captain Hyperbole to the rescue!
Since I have you blocked didn't read your reply but I can guess the contents of it and most likely are the same sound bites you've posted over and over again, in any case my response would be: "Sure, whatever floats your boat..."
 
Captain Hyperbole to the rescue!
Since I have you blocked didn't read your reply but I can guess the contents of it and most likely are the same sound bites you've posted over and over again, in any case my response would be: "Sure, whatever floats your boat..."

No problem, at least I'm contributing to the discussion like a mature adult instead of storming out of the room with my hands covering my ears saying, "blahblahblahblah I'm not listening to youuuuuu!! blahblahblah." ;)
 
If they decided to do another 200x sub how do you think it would do ? It seems to be the most loved mini sub they have done so far and people love the extra details to the figures, so it could work for another round right ?
 
If they decided to do another 200x sub how do you think it would do ? It seems to be the most loved mini sub they have done so far and people love the extra details to the figures, so it could work for another round right ?

No sub or mini sub has ever failed yet with the MOTUC line. Mattel can offer a Twiggets mini sub and it would still sell.
 
No problem, at least I'm contributing to the discussion like a mature adult instead of storming out of the room with my hands covering my ears saying, "blahblahblahblah I'm not listening to youuuuuu!! blahblahblah." ;)

:lol:lol:lol:lol
 
Back
Top