Thanks for the TDKR picture, that's the one paint I saw! Now that one looks absolutely amazing and definitely superior to the Mezco release, but see, the painter is not Tony Mei. How much is this headsculpt with this particular paint application worth?
No there isn't, it's bad craft and bad decisions based in inexperience, other 1/12 manufactures don't have that problem with soft goods, they can't even add pockets to their pants FFS.
I'm going to prove you wrong easily.
First, name me 10 big toy companies that produce 1/12 figures with full clothes (please don't mention brands that offer a jacket or a shirt only with "real" clothes)
So?
Yeah, you can't, because there aren't much doing this right now.
I suppose you are familiar with what ThreeA is doing, but do you actually own one of their 1/12 figures? I do. And I can tell you the material quality of their clothes is nowhere near as good as Mezco's. They wear over time. I've own TDKR for years and it doesn't show a single sign of wear. However my ThreeA 1/12 figures do. Bear in mind I almost never pose them.
About the pockets in the pants, ThreeA figures do have this, and guess what: it makes the pants look baggy, not tight, and it's completely useless. Worse, if you try to put anything in those pockets, it tears the fabric on each of those 1/12 ThreeA figures. Believe me, I've tried.
I think Mezco are trying to do their best to offer a product that won't get much damage over time and offer pants as tight and classy as possible. And you really don't need real pockets. At least they are coherent in not proposing real pockets.
ThreeA sometimes offer real pockets, sometimes not, without any real reason. I really hate how much of their clothes wear over time.
I also know of Vortex Toys, I own one, and while the quality of their fabric is decent, they are as expensive as Mezco and the material they use is not on par with Mezco.
So it's clearly not bad design, bad craft, bad engineering, and even less bad decisions from Mezco. What they are doing is clearly something to protect your figures and offer the best possible product visually and the most solid one. If you can't see that, you're in complete denial.
There's also a lot of post purchase rationalization going on with Mezco, clearly mediocre/awful figures get praised after purchase, like Superman
You don't know what you're talking about man. Have a look at my earlier posts in the two Mezco topics, I don't believe someone has been as critical as I have been when reviewing the products. I was very disappointed by Superman for several reasons, and I'm not rationalizing the cash I invested in it.
It seems to me though that you would like more Mezco figures but maybe can't for some reasons and you look like you're trying very hard to justify not buying them.
The form is better, the fabic is better, the trunks are better and more formfitting without the need of those awful vynil trunks.
Nope, nope, nope and... nope.
There is no Mezco figure outfit that Tony Mei hasn't vastly improved.
Do you have high resolution pictures of more of his work? I certainly haven't seen his take of Modern & Classic Red Skull and other recent figures like Harley Quinn, if you claim he did better, prove it.
They are digitally sculpted, so are Mezco's, he does paint himself but also does outsourcing IIRC.
Headsculpts painted by him or his friends are impeccable and miles ahead of Mezco's.
Oh really? That's what it looked like... Are you sure Mezco uses this same technique? If so, please show me your source of information.
Well, the TDKR picture posted earlier shows it's not his paint job. Do you have a picture of that same head sculpt with his paint job? From what I've seen of his paint work, it's not on par with Mezco. But that other painter guy, now that's what I would call a professional job.
I did answer that the price is an issue, IIRC a full figure is around $200 plus s/h, it's bad, but I'll hapily pay that for a definitive Superman, however I am not willing to pay $160 for 2 horrible Mezco Superman figures to have them shipped to Tony.
Thanks for the information.
$200... That's way too much for something that looks amateurish. So clearly a definitive pass for me. I'll still look with an open-mind his upcoming projects.
You're not picky at all
your standard is extremely low, but oddly enough you filter out the best stuff.
I assure you I'm very picky. If you think being picky is paying $200 for something amateur, then there's clearly something wrong with you