I still say any figure from. An incomplete line...what's the point having half a line up
I add this for consideration....
Was it Noland,Fatburns character in "Predators"?A figure that hasn't exactly set the World alight.And making Tonto without the Lone Ranger has to rank among the stupidest decisions ever.
Based on this answer HT's would have to close down cuz they'd have nothing to make LOL. Wolverine? Really?
The WM milk is a totally cool figure. They took some artistic license, but it's a fun figure.
Making the Lone Ranger Tonto without making the actual Lone Ranger to go with it- HUGE HT fail!
View attachment 265936
Gotta say Electro...bad design, questionable characterization and not worth the price of admission.
I woulda bought him
Oooh definitely. Total waste of time.
There are so many. I think people have this well in hand though. Maybe I'd add Perseus and that Prince of Persia Jake Gylenhaal figure.
So HT made a mistake making the sidekick Tonto first and they also made the mistake of making the main character of Avatar as well? Honestly they can't win. If you really wanted a Lone Ranger then you should have bought Tonto to support the line. Anyone who complains about not getting a Lone Ranger when they didn't buy Tonto only have themselves to blame. Same for all the Neytiri lovers who passed on Jake.I disagree about Electro. The movie version was underwhelming, but as a huge Spidey fan, I was happy to get any villain from his rogues made. I was never happy with the fact that they didn't do the Raimi villains aside from New Goblin, who was the worst in both characterization and design. I think had they not led with him, and had started with a character that would've sold well like Doc Ock, Green Goblin, or the obvious money-maker Venom then that line would've continued. Either way, I'm happy to own Electro as a figure.
I'd agree on Perseus and Prince of Persia. I'd also add that Jake Sully from Avatar was probably a bad move as a solo figure as well.