The Craw
Super Freak
i wonder if those lightsabers taste like candy?
mmmmmm.....1/6 lightsaber.
mmmmmm.....1/6 lightsaber.
official Sideshow 1:6 Snake Eyes discussion thread (with full photo)
- Thread starter metaphorge
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
King Darkness
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Messages
- 44,456
- Reaction score
- 208
when your starving you cant eat your toys
Oh yeah...well....does your precious food come with all those accessories?
Huh?.....Yeah....I didnt think so.
The Craw
Super Freak
no, but if you're lucky you can get one of those "spork" thingys. those are pretty cool. it's like a fork and spoon rolled into one. it's genius!!!Oh yeah...well....does your precious food come with all those accessories?
Huh?.....Yeah....I didnt think so.
King Darkness
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2006
- Messages
- 44,456
- Reaction score
- 208
Oh yeah...well....does your precious food come with all those accessories?
Huh?.....Yeah....I didnt think so.
Ha! thats about all Sideshow can do right...the accessories are fantastic..but it be nice to have a kick ass figure to look good holding them
The Craw
Super Freak
the figures can't be that bad. the chicks dig em:
preeny101
Super Freak
This debate is getting ridiculous. I think that Sideshow does need to do a better job of replicating thier protos but I don't think this Snake Eyes figure will be as disapponting as the production pics would suggest.
Its the oral sex references that are crossing the line. No one is directing comments like that toward you. If you and thenammagazine are fine going back and forth without the vulgarity then you guys can knock yourselves out. You make sweeping generalities that everyone who likes SE is some sort of SSC worshipper while ignoring the fact that most of us, thenammagazine included, recognize that there are things SSC could have done better, whether it be the production poses, photography, or base body itself.
Is Snake Eyes as pitch perfect as Bank Robber Joker? No. Is it the best SE figure EVER and an all around awesome looking figure? A lot of us seem to think so.
preeny101
Super Freak
All in All, it still looks like a solid figure. I still contend we should wait until we get SE in hand before rushing to judgment.
knucklefunger
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2008
- Messages
- 1,963
- Reaction score
- 0
Not a Joe fan but this looks impressive enough to consider. Impressive amount gear
Post 4,000 dedicated to Snakes!
I think stripped down, 1985-style with just an uzi in one hand and his sword bandolier across his chest will greatly reduce the "bottom heavy" look that contributes to his shoulders looking thin.
I think stripped down, 1985-style with just an uzi in one hand and his sword bandolier across his chest will greatly reduce the "bottom heavy" look that contributes to his shoulders looking thin.
Post 4,000 dedicated to Snakes!
I think stripped down, 1985-style with just an uzi in one hand and his sword bandolier across his chest will greatly reduce the "bottom heavy" look that contributes to his shoulders looking thin.
thats an awesome picture of the figure, but its not what we are getting....see new pics
Only real difference is a change in the shirt material. The new shirt looks thicker which could be a *good* thing for this figure.
Dally
Super Freak
His shoulders definitely looked filled out in this picture. I think it is just a combination of bad posing and weird angles that give it the illusion of poor shoulders.
The Craw
Super Freak
futz your figures people and he will look fine.
personally i've never liked any SS final photo. they all suffer from poorly rushed poses and bad lighting. the only thing that will make me not like this figure is if it has floppy joints. that's the only thing im worried about right now.
personally i've never liked any SS final photo. they all suffer from poorly rushed poses and bad lighting. the only thing that will make me not like this figure is if it has floppy joints. that's the only thing im worried about right now.
devilof76
Super Freak
Even in most of the proto pics, the shoulders are less than full. There really is no difference. In the shot you posted his arms are bent up. In any shot that his arms are hanging by his side, the shoulders look just like the production pics. If anything is contributing to the shoulders looking smaller it is the fact that the new shirt does not appear to be as tight. At the same time, the proto shirt wasn't all that tight either.
95% of the difference between proto and production is photography. The 5% left over being the glossier visor and the rearranged accessories.
preeny101
Super Freak
The production shots were defnitely of poor quality. SO many reviews on SS's site say "photos do not this justice." I'm guessing that is the case here, as well.
Dally
Super Freak
That is definitely the case with Indy. Indy has the pro problems, but I can easily get him to hold a gun the correct way. Even if they didn't fix the pro for SE (Which I'm sure they did at least somewhat) than he'll be able to aim an uzi.
He looks badass in this production pic
preeny101
Super Freak
Hopefully. BTW, sux about the Eagles.
Dally
Super Freak
Ugh, I know I was so disappointed.
Similar threads
