How you chaps have the patience to individually quote and respond to specific lines
I sound like WWEJedi huh? I'm perfectly fine with P2 being the under-appreciated little gem it apparently is
What are you talking about? I addressed the review and I maintain it's retarded to take away the mystery from the Predator.
I have made plenty of arguments and I could quote them again, why are you so hell bent on covering your ears? I don't get it.
Who the hell wants to know more about Predators? Leave that **** in mistery, that's one of the reasons AvP sucks.
I sound like WWEJedi huh?
Dude, I asked you like 3 times to explain why is the jungle so pivotal to the Predator and you could not do it, 3 times, you just ignored me, yet you expect me to just spoon feed you a scene you missed.
It is true, and you haven't explained why not, nu-uh isn't an explanation. None of us have even touched the subject of the writing in either movies.
That's not what you said in the part your post I quoted is it? Seriously, what is it that you need to twist, ignore, make up arguments, do you not want a serious discussion?
You said
P2 and P1 have the same level of quality writing.
so I said
No, because P1 is the original, the film that gave us that world and the main creature...
then your response was
And none of that has to do with writing, Jesus Christ dude
and my response was
The story of an elite group of soldiers being hunted by a reptile like Alien has nothing to do with the writing? The great character intros, the lines, and a great first, second and third act has nothing to do with the writing? If you actually read the "Hunter" script, you'll see how detail it is and how much of what you see on screen is on the script.
The fact that one has a semi-plot breaking moment and the other one doesn't doesn't give credit to the latter? Alright.
But basically, his power set is the same, only his powerlevels vary, right now, he's pretty much Golden Age, can't fly, has some super strength and vulnerability, but his regular power levels in current main continuity is that he can bench press the weight of the earth for 5 days straight deprived of sunlight when he regains his powers, that's probably what he'll go back to.
Can't fly? Is this a usual thing? I'm really not familiar with comic Superman but I thought that flying was one of his staple powers.
He was talking about the current comics/story arcs in which Superman lost his powers and can't fly. It's not permanent...he will be good old powerful Sups eventually.
Yep, you argued with him so much...some part of him got imprinted on to you...Smith/Neo style
Christ almighty, Gaspar (you too Clown Prince of typing).
------
I caught 'Kickboxer' again for the first time in years the other day -- 7.8 / 10.
Cheesy as ****, but it's Van Damme in his absolute prime, & the fight scenes with Tong Po are still excellent to this day.
They're fans of Furiosa.... or the chicks on the Enterprise have discovered razors.
Yeah, it is actually. Still, I found it cheap recently, & I'm happy to have it added to my movie library. I was a huge fan of his growing up, & always wanted to go back & get those first few films of his that were actually really cool.. except for Double Impact. Loved it in high school, but it's a pretty dumb movie.I always thought it was a good flick. It's a rehash of Bloodsport in some ways, but I didn't mind.
Yeah, it is actually. Still, I found it cheap recently, & I'm happy to have it added to my movie library. I was a huge fan of his growing up, & always wanted to go back & get those first few films of his that were actually really cool.. except for Double Impact. Loved it in high school, but it's a pretty dumb movie.
Still gotta get the original Universal Soldier too.
Street Fighter
as a little kid
in the theater
Enter your email address to join: