Star Wars: Episode IX - THE RISE OF SKYWALKER

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Another thing I really hated about the prequels was how they messed with Vader and Obi Wan's age.

It's only 19 or 20 years from the end of Ep III to ANH.

Well, it's been around 20 years since they filmed Episode One. Shouldn't Ewan look just like Alec Guiness now?



No, he doesn't live in a desert with twin suns ;)






Although I agree that said reasoning only accounts for so much.... An oversight if ever there was one.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Another thing I really hated about the prequels was how they messed with Vader and Obi Wan's age.

It's only 19 or 20 years from the end of Ep III to ANH.

Well, it's been around 20 years since they filmed Episode One. Shouldn't Ewan look just like Alec Guiness now?

I wanna try playing PT apologist for a minute. Let's see if I can get the hang of this . . .

Um, maybe Kenobi aged so harshly because of some hard livin' he did on Tatooine; he probably spent too much time getting wasted at Mos Eisley and turned himself into a wreck. Wait! . . . That would also explain why he turned into such a liar, and got so damn forgetful! See? All part of the brilliant PT plan to bring everything together! Makes perfect sense. :lol

The Jawa's stripped him on the Crawler of all the best gadgets before they sold him to Uncle Owen. Sounds good to me! lol

Considering how urgent Leia's message to Kenobi was, you'd think Artoo might've wanted to use those handy-dandy leg rockets to find his old pal Obi-Wan a little faster. It may have even helped him avoid those Jawas in the first place.
 
Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

I wanna try playing PT apologist for a minute. Let's see if I can get the hang of this . . .

Um, maybe Kenobi aged so harshly because of some hard livin' he did on Tatooine; he probably spent too much time getting wasted at Mos Eisley and turned himself into a wreck. Wait! . . . That would also explain why he turned into such a liar, and got so damn forgetful! See? All part of the brilliant PT plan to bring everything together! Makes perfect sense. :lol



Considering how urgent Leia's message to Kenobi was, you'd think Artoo might've wanted to use those handy-dandy leg rockets to find his old pal Obi-Wan a little faster. It may have even helped him avoid those Jawas in the first place.

Can I play?

Artoo was broken after ROTS...and even though he’s a droid that can fix everything....he cannot fox himself....

So sad.


Sent from the inside of a giant slug in outer space.....
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

All I can say is thank the maker I grew up with the OT and not the PT and then have my brain conditioned to think the PT are quality products.

At least with the OT it’s not just childhood nostalgia that makes them great they actually are cinematic masterpieces.

I almost want to start a PT abuse charity for those that think the PT are great because that’s what they grew up with.

You have no idea how much it bothers me that Maul was in Solo. :lol
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Don't you guys ever get tired of having the same conversations about Star Wars over and over again? Most of you dudes are pushing 40 and 50 and you're still bringing up the same talking points that you've been posting incessantly for nearly two decades now . . .

When is that little guy from the 70s and 80s gonna grow up and put his toys away? He got his revival, he got to revisit his childhood multiple times with a bunch of baby movies and plastic, when is it going to be enough?
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Yeah we hate the PT and love the OT and are split on the ST. Talk over...move on:lol
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Don't you guys ever get tired of having the same conversations about Star Wars over and over again? Most of you dudes are pushing 40 and 50 and you're still bringing up the same talking points that you've been posting incessantly for nearly two decades now . . .

When is that little guy from the 70s and 80s gonna grow up and put his toys away? He got his revival, he got to revisit his childhood multiple times with a bunch of baby movies and plastic, when is it going to be enough?

We can’t.

We still have Solo bluray to discuss.

We still have IX to discuss.

Then Rian’s trilogy.

Then Favreau’s series.

Then Obi Wan movie.

Then Boba Fett movie.

Then the new season of Clone Wars.

Then OT 4K unaltered.

Then

Then

Then

Pull up a chair :lol
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Don't you guys ever get tired of having the same conversations about Star Wars over and over again? Most of you dudes are pushing 40 and 50 and you're still bringing up the same talking points that you've been posting incessantly for nearly two decades now . . .

When is that little guy from the 70s and 80s gonna grow up and put his toys away? He got his revival, he got to revisit his childhood multiple times with a bunch of baby movies and plastic, when is it going to be enough?

Maybe we should talk incessantly about sports like most men......statistics....point spreads.....betting...thats more grown up.

How about politics...we can debate the LIB's versus the REpugs's.......

That's much better.

Thank you for the corrective guidance.....I am on my way over to FOX and WAPO for some REAL grown up conversation.


:p
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

While I disagree with your interpretations/explanations of these points, we both know that if I were to present quotes and examples from the OT to back my point of view, we still wouldn't get any closer to agreeing on any of this. It would just keep a perpetual circle spinning. So I'll just add this instead with all sincerity: I credit you for your steadfast defense of the PT, especially because you do it with great civility. You're good people, Prime Clone, and a credit to this forum.


Likewise dude! :duff There ain't enough civil discourse in today's world.

A more civilised age... before the dark times. Before social media!



Dagobah swamp

Er, he wanted an excuse to use his periscope?


Plunging off the edge of Jabba's sail barge

That was "falling with style". Strategic dive to find cover in the dunes?

OK, you got me. Lucas had to walk a tightrope with the PT to show new stuff without seeming too out of place with the OT. He didn't always succeed. (Feel free to quote this bit ad nauseam!)




No, he doesn't live in a desert with twin suns ;)


via Imgflip Meme Generator
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

We can’t.

We still have Solo bluray to discuss.

We still have IX to discuss.

*Then Rian’s trilogy.

Then Favreau’s series.

Then Obi Wan movie.

*Then Boba Fett movie.

Then the new season of Clone Wars.

*Then OT 4K unaltered.

Then

Then

Then

Pull up a chair :lol

*Won't happen.
(Solo sequel - Obi-wan & Boba Fett will become one movie. "SoloFett-Wan")
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Don't you guys ever get tired of having the same conversations about Star Wars over and over again? Most of you dudes are pushing 40 and 50 and you're still bringing up the same talking points that you've been posting incessantly for nearly two decades now . . .

When is that little guy from the 70s and 80s gonna grow up and put his toys away? He got his revival, he got to revisit his childhood multiple times with a bunch of baby movies and plastic, when is it going to be enough?

move along.jpg
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

OK, you got me. Lucas had to walk a tightrope with the PT to show new stuff without seeming too out of place with the OT. He didn't always succeed. (Feel free to quote this bit ad nauseam!)

See I think that this is pretty much the greatest thing that people on either side of any SW debate can ever say. "Yeah I realize that everything doesn't add up for [insert whatever movie/cartoon/comic episode] but I like it anyway so sue me." :duff

Because there really isn't an objective truth that any of us get to stand on when defending our favorite films or preferred canon other than cultural impact and/or box office. Even if PT lovers and haters alike agree that they are full of badly delivered cringe-worthy dialogue even that doesn't inherently mean that it can't be *entertaining* badly delivered cringe-worthy dialogue. This stuff either appeals to you on an aesthetic or nostalgic level (or both) or it doesn't. The fun in digging our heels in and trying to make an irrefutable case for why we like this and don't like that is really just an excuse to wax eloquent about something that's been such a fun part of our lives for as long as many of us can remember.
 
Last edited:
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Don't you guys ever get tired of having the same conversations about Star Wars over and over again? Most of you dudes are pushing 40 and 50 and you're still bringing up the same talking points that you've been posting incessantly for nearly two decades now . . .

When is that little guy from the 70s and 80s gonna grow up and put his toys away? He got his revival, he got to revisit his childhood multiple times with a bunch of baby movies and plastic, when is it going to be enough?

I know you're being ironic because you have a kids cartoon as your sig, and judging by your post count you've had many pointless conversations over the years
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Tell you what though pointless or not DiFabio has posted some of the best movie analysis over the years so even if pointless they were always a pleasure to read.

Khev is no different.

:chase
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

And yet difabio can’t seem to keep away even after banning himself
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

The mystery that surrounded Boba Fett, and had so much to do with why he was ever cool in the first place, got stripped away from his character. For no good reason other than to tie Boba Fett into the prequels and sell Jango Fett toys. A reason to like the Empire? The Empire who would be formed, in part, by using all those Fett clone brothers as disposable soldiers? Yeah, Boba Fett is a mere clone - one among a countless number of others who serve as blaster fodder. The PT didn't damage OT Boba Fett?

I would submit that the argument of "he was brought back just to sell toys" just shouldn't be used in a Star Wars discussion :lol
But seriously, I understand the "mystery" of the character being cool, I disagree with the assertion that this specific back-story is bad or damaging to the character. And don't forget that Boba Fett is a special clone. He's not like the rest of the clones used (first) by the Republic as cannon fodder... Another reason for Boba Fett's arrogant and cool demeanor.

The PT turned OT Kenobi into an idiot who seemingly forgot R2-D2 and C-3PO . . . despite spending years with Artoo, and plenty of time around Threepio. He also took baby Luke to the same farm that was connected to Anakin's mom (that was the best hiding place?). To compound that, he decided to hide there too so that if Vader found him in a quest for revenge, he'd be sure to find Luke as well. :slap He also needed Yoda to "remind him" in the OT that Luke had a sister who would also be strong with the Force; and he was already a freakin' ghost Kenobi by then! The PT didn't damage OT Kenobi?

As somebody else said, it was established that Anakin had been in Tattooine from the get-go. Uncle Lars and Aunt Beru knew Anakin, that was established in Ep. IV. Splitting the kids and hiding both in plain sight was actually a clever idea. Again, someone else mentioned that sending Luke to the one place Vader had reason to hate (and it being far removed from where the real action was taking place helped) and hiding Leia with powerful people close to the Jedi cause was a good plan. And, again, this was all established in the OT. If you can accept that Vader's descent into the Dark Side prevented him from sensing his own daughter while torturing her, then you can accept the plan to hide Luke in Tattooine...

As for not recognizing the droids, it did bother me at first, but then I thought that maybe good ole' scheming Ben didn't want to have to explain too much to Luke... "oh, sure I know this droid Luke, it was your father's! And this other one, yeah, of course, he built him right here, but we had their memories erased so they didn't tell anybody what they knew about you, me and your father as well... what's that? Why nobody should know about you? Oh... well... errr... never mind, come and join me in a crusade to destroy your fa... I mean, the Empire!"
In Ep. VI it was established that Obi Wan had a rather ambiguous understanding of the concept of "truth", so in retrospective, it makes sense that he would tell Luke as little as possible about his connection to the droids.

Finally, Obi Wan states Luke is their last hope, to which Yoda replies "no, there is another". That doesn't mean the Obi Wan is unaware of Leia, it merely means he did not think of Leia as a possible candidate for Jedi training.

That sure sounds A LOT like TLJ Luke to me. But, anyway, I'll stick with PT Yoda.

Yoda, who could sense danger in young Anakin but was oblivious to Dooku and Palpatine despite them both being right under his nose for extended time. And the high-flying, acrobatic, lightsaber-wielding Yoda who went to kill Palpatine decided to hide right afterward just because that first attempt didn't work. Did he somehow feel like trying again would be that much stupider in the near future? So he went to Dagobah for 20 years to, what, wait for baby Luke to grow up? . . . The Luke who Kenobi had to convince him to train in ESB. None of that changes Yoda for the worse at all?

Hmmmm... I think there's a big difference between Yoda's self-imposed exile and Luke's. First off, Yoda went into exile after being soundly defeated by the Emperor and seeing the entire Republic brought (willingly) to its knees. Remember, the Emperor was acclaimed and welcomed with open arms by most of the Senate. The entire system failed. Yoda realized the Jedi had failed, their arrogance and hubris had blinded them and brought about the fall of that which they had protected for so long, not least of all because of their blindness in nurturing and leading Anakin Skywalker.
Secondly, Yoda had a plan. One which almost failed (again), but a plan never the less.

Now TFA/TLJ Luke had learned all these lessons, he knew what had brought down the Republic, the Jedi, and his father. He had helped bring back the Republic and had its full backing to deal with the FO, and yet he goes into hiding without a back-up plan. That's a big difference in motivation and execution.

Back to Yoda. After all his carefully laid out plans he's reluctant to train Luke because he has misgivings. This one, a long time has he watched, and he knows how much fear and anger are in him, just like his father, so yeah, he's a bit reluctant to train him at first, despite his plans. But Luke turned out alright after all.

So, no. None of that changes Yoda for the worse at all. ;)

That's precisely the problem! The character of Darth Vader commanded respect, and had a gravity and controlled dignity - not just by rank, but by core personality and presence. And the "teenager" excuse is a bit of a cop out; he was about 20 or so by ROTS - and still whiny and annoying. Most of the "formative" and angst-riddled years would be behind him by then. He was supposed to be a Jedi! And a great one! But there was no poise or solemnity like a Kenobi, a Mace, or a Qui-Gon had in spite of TEN YEARS of training.

At the very least, Anakin should have been written and portrayed to convey some semblance of the controlled, dignified, and impressive badass that was OT Vader. Instead, he was whiny and petulant - without any hint that he could become the man in the Vader suit years later. Again, he was essentially already a man in ROTS. There's such an illogical disconnect between the two versions that it's jarring. Do you really see a believable transition from the Christensen Anakin screaming "I HATE YOU!!" to the Vader we see in the OT in the intervening years?

To accept the prequels as canon, then OT Vader is instantly less of a cool character. He's just a guy who turned to the dark side because he wanted to save his wife (who, by the way, he killed shortly thereafter for some still-unclear reason). That's not damaging to OT Vader?

That the ten years of training were not able to instill that poise and dignity in Anakin is precisely the indictment of the Jedi, it's their failure. If they had succeeded, how would Anakin have turned to the bad side? Remember, Anakin was a troubled child from the beginning, and some of his most important formative years where lived hiding a secret love, mourning a dead mother and fighting a terrible war. Not an ideal way to give balance and dignity to a young man.
And twenty years sinking into the Dark Side might give you some gravitas, don't you think?
I find it pretty cool to see how that tormented young man strides into the Tantive IV having become the embodiment of evil.

No, they chose to let Luke train Ben Solo to be a Jedi. I'm pretty sure Leia (and even Han) would have had an eye toward the future. The Skywalker bloodline was special, and Ben could help preserve (or restore) peace as a powerful Jedi after Luke and Leia would no longer be around to do it.

You're absolutely right that the ST didn't need to split Han and Leia, but it does add more weight to the impact of Ben's turning into Kylo. Their split could've come as a result of Snoke corrupting their son. Han wasn't a big fan of the Jedi to begin with. As Luke (in TLJ) describes taking Ben to be trained: "Han was . . . 'Han' about it."

The fact that Luke was training Kylo doesn't mean the parents didn't fail.

There was no suspicion when Luke briefly ignited his lightsaber. He explicitly states that he saw at that moment that Ben had already been corrupted by Snoke. Too far gone to the dark side, by Luke's estimation. And Luke stood over his defenseless father with his lightsaber still lit before realizing what kind of dark act he might be about to commit in the name of erasing the evil threat of Vader. And, so too, he stood over Ben with a lit lightsaber before recognizing that his impulse was very wrong. He told Rey how ashamed he felt for even entertaining the thought.

I don't understand why this continues to be such a departure from OT Luke for so many people. He's always been impulsive. He has already been on the brink of killing, and crossing a line in the name of protecting others from a corrupted Skywalker. And in both cases, his impulsive reaction was overcome by a more reasoned and Jedi-like approach.

True. But it negates that he learned anything in the intervening years. Besides, Vader was a full-fledged Sith Lord, the scourge of the Galaxy. He had threatened to turn Luke's sister. Kylo was a young kid with potential. Hardly deserving of the same treatment, wouldn't you agree?

As Khev already mentioned in the post you were quoting, nothing from the OT has been erased by the ST. These are older versions of the heroes we knew, which means that their futures were always a mystery. What the PT did was take established history and characterization that was presented in the OT, and changed it for the worse in a number of ways. If you accept the PT, it's a lot harder (impossible, actually) to think of the OT characters in the same way as we did pre-PT. But the ST cannot re-write those OT characters and interactions. They will forever be valid and irrevocable unless there's some crazy OT flashback scene in Episode IX. That's a big difference between PT and ST in my view.

I fundamentally disagree with this.
Vader's actions cannot be changed by the PT. He remains who he was.
But Luke has forever been changed.

Anyway, great discussion!
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

As somebody else said, it was established that Anakin had been in Tattooine from the get-go. Uncle Lars and Aunt Beru knew Anakin, that was established in Ep. IV. Splitting the kids and hiding both in plain sight was actually a clever idea.

I don't think it was. Too risky. How did Obi-Wan know Vader would never go back to that farm on Tatooine? People can do unexpected things sometimes. And if Vader became aware that he had a son by any means other than how it actually happened it would surely be one of the places he would investigate merely to question Owen Lars on what he knew. Instead though he'd be hitting the jackpot straight away - there'd be a young man there of the right age and with the surname Skywalker FFS! :lol
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Possible, however that doesn't change the fact that the problem lies in the OT, not the PT.
 
Re: Star Wars: Episode IX - December 20, 2019

Correct. That was my point when I originally drew attention to that a few pages back. One of few things that can't be blamed on the PT.
 
Back
Top