I was going to reply to you TaliBane but Khev and JAWS summed up my thoughts on ROTJ and TLJ Luke. On both cases, we see Luke briefly losing himself and caving to the dark side.
There's this repeating theme in Star Wars where Jedi seem to be almost psychotic in teetering between good and evil.
But... what's the difference between
someone triggers you so you fight harder/better for 60 SECONDS and
"caving to the dark side"? One friggin minute, and yup - all LUKE does is dueling better/stronger... is that truly considered "losing himself to the darkside" to you guys? Seriously?
I thought it was massacring younglings by the dozen, or murdering your benevolent master or... shooting up Walmart or something? Maybe we have different thresholds for dark side.
JAWS just summarizes the same ol', same ol but again - if Luke has "caved to the dark side" then why didn't he kill Vader in the second or two after he chopped off his hand? This is a question no one goes near. I mean he's "caved to the dark side," right? Transformed, foaming at the mouth and murderous. But
the second he defeats Vader... he just stops.
Khev says "Luke was all set to kill his dad until Palps' laughter snapped him out of his funk and he realized what he was about to do"
But if Luke was "all set to..." WHY DIDN'T HE?
I mean
before Palps' laughter, in the instant he's won the duel?
He's turned to the dark side, all yellow eyes-ish, he's disarmed/defeated Vader - so then why stop? At the time Palps starts cackling and walks down, shouldn't darkside consumed Luke be teeth-gritted and grinning, taunting Vader about how he's going to die now for everything he's done, saber-tip at Vader's face. Something more... darkside-y?
Nope. Just stops, returns to normal Luke within seconds. I mean a failure of filmmaking for sure, but Luke does not "lose himself to the dark side" nor is he "all set to kill his dad" but is then interrupted. That may be what you're supposed to take away from it, but that is NOT onscreen.
Based on Luke's exact dialogue in TLJ explaining to Rey his intentions and what happened as a result:
"I saw darkness. I'd sensed it building in him. I'd seen it in moments during his training. But then I looked inside, and it was beyond what I ever imagined. Snoke had already turned his heart. He would bring destruction, and pain, and death, and the end of everything I love because of what he would become. And for the briefest moment of pure instinct, I thought I could stop it. It passed like a fleeting shadow. And I was left with shame... and with consequence. And the last thing I saw were the eyes of a frightened boy whose master had failed him."
Drivel.
Flowery dialog that
deliberately dances around the FACTS: (1) Luke thought he saw Ben's future (seeming to 100% contradict what Yoda told him - and US - about attempting to see the future through the force) and (2) then decided to kill Ben.
I mean what kind of bs writing is "for the briefest moment of pure instinct, I thought I could stop it." Yup, I
think what he meant to say is "I had some future visions and believed they were real, so I decided I'd go to Ben's hut in the middle of the night and kill him"
Am I wrong? If so, how?
And no he didn't bring his lightsaber into Ben's hut because he had murderous intent he simply brought his lightsaber because Jedi pretty much carry them wherever they go. That's not a new thing.
Yes, they take their saber with them when they go to take a crap, and also just so happened to have it when they visit their student's hut in the middle of the night with murderous intentions. Oh, Khev. This is the ST Koolaid I speak of.