- Joined
- Apr 19, 2013
- Messages
- 10,930
- Reaction score
- 4,817
I don?t think being relatable matters at all. When adjusted for inflation, ANH ranks #2 all time in gross. Ultimately the ST sucked and wasn?t fun where as Marvel didn?t suck and was fun.
Now that Star Wars doesn?t suck again and is fun again, we are seeing just how dominant and popular it can be.
I don't pay much attention to box office. It means a lot of people were compelled to see a thing, not that it was a good story necessarily. I think Avatar was hot garbage but based on hype alone (apparently) a lot of people went to see it.
I do think the ST was a very poor set of films based on a deeply flawed concept, and that MCU is just *fun* ... but thinking about what makes it fun for non-geeks, accessibility is probably a strong factor. Lower barrier to entry: Superheroes making quips and beating up bad guys in NYC! vs. Higher barrier to entry: Sprawling space opera that goes back 9 or 10 different movies starting in 1977.
[...]I do consider those tactical oddities to be among my chiefest complaints against the film.
Star Wars is full of them. You can nitpick 'em but you either accept 'em or not.
[...] As far as the "why not jump ahead?" scenario goes, is that even possible with lightspeed? Wouldn't even the shortest lightspeed jump take them farther away from the cruiser, but just from the front?
The Raddus would still have shields and enough of a distance gap. Nothing more than a 90 degree turn would solve that problem, right?
I can't remember now, but didn't they know *exactly* where the Raddus was? The jump(s) might be complicated but not canon-breaking, far as I can tell. That whole chase was weird.
Another good one:
Not bad.