Star Wars: The Force Awakens (12/18/15)

[King Darkness]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Star Wars lives in my heart!

JERKS

 

[The Josh]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Star Wars lives in my heart!

JERKS

You have a heart?

 

[VintijDroidGutzz]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

''Remnant'' Like a faecal remnant on the side of a toilet bowl you see?

Reminds me of a Richard Pryor routine..

 

[lerath666]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

For everyone.

Not for me.

I embrace the EU ( well, the well written, sensable parts of it anyways)

I enjoy the SE versions, with their flaws.

I even like the PT. Yes, it has its problems, yes it's flawed, but I still enjoy it.

Clone wars Was Also great.


I'm eagerly awaiting the NT.

 

[Something Sexy]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

**** ya! Star Wars is still great. I still enjoy a lot of the EU stuff. Special Editions don't bother me. I still hate Episode 2 but I can stand 1 and 3.

 

[lerath666]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

My biggest problem with AOTC, is that it feels out of place.

Its as if they were going to take it one way.... then changed direction into the production of ROTS.

Palpatine's appearence is the most glaring example of this.

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Good luck eliminating SW out of your life if you have kids.

The PT are the best movies ever made for kids.

Didn't GL daughter say that adults who complained about the PT are a bunch of A holes.

 

[pixletwin]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Good luck eliminating SW out of your life if you have kids.

That would be easy for me. My kids have ZERO interest in SW.

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

That would be easy for me. My kids have ZERO interest in SW.

Mine has no interest in the OT but loves the PT.

 

[furystorm]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Is NT really what we're calling it? I figures ST, not NT...

I'm assuming NT = New Trilogy
I figured ST = Sequel Trilogy

Makes the most sense to me...

 

[furystorm]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Of course, then you'd have PT, OT, ST...

Or POS for the entire saga!

 

[karamazov80]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Much like Jack nicholson, no REAL range at all. He's just got "ONE LOOK".
Jack Nicholson has Crazy/eccentric weirdo, Hayden has whiney *****.

Check out Chinatown, Five Easy Pieces, and the Last Detail. Nicholson's no Daniel Day-Lewis or Gary Oldman (who else is???), but he's a damn fine actor with some genuine range. The fact that he played a nutball in so many movies doesn't mean that's all he was capable of. And hell, even there you've got a pretty broad spectrum of crazy from McMurphy, to Torrance, to Joker, to all the crazy old guys he played later on.

 

[darthviper107]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Is NT really what we're calling it? I figures ST, not NT...

I'm assuming NT = New Trilogy
I figured ST = Sequel Trilogy

Makes the most sense to me...

It should be ST, though I'm not sure what we would call episodes 10, 11, and 12

 

[furystorm]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

More cash grab garbage?

While I'm excited about the prospect of a return to greatness for Star Wars, I'll say I'm cautiously optimistic.

 

[TURINS~BANE]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

still nothing on this...

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

I wonder if lens flare will be used to cover the returning cast ages.

Like everytime Han in his Hoth costume turns to the camera all we see is this:

 

[lerath666]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Is NT really what we're calling it? I figures ST, not NT...

I'm assuming NT = New Trilogy
I figured ST = Sequel Trilogy

Makes the most sense to me...

I've been using NT for next trilogy, though we don't know if it's JUST going to be a trilogy, do we?

I tend to avoid the word Sequel, as it tends to bring with it negative connotations.

I guess We should be calling it DF, or NF, as I'm pretty sure it will be MORE than a trilogy.

DF = Disney Films
NF = New Films.

 

[Khev]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Is NT really what we're calling it? I figures ST, not NT...

I'm assuming NT = New Trilogy
I figured ST = Sequel Trilogy

Makes the most sense to me...

Yeah. "Sequel Trilogy" appears to be the default moniker for the next set of films.

Mine has no interest in the OT but loves the PT.

Right now my son prefers Lego SW above all others.

 

[jye4ever]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

Yeah. "Sequel Trilogy" appears to be the default moniker for the next set of films.



Right now my son prefers Lego SW above all others.

Lego, what a freaking rip off.

How did those things become so expensive.

 

[VintijDroidGutzz]

Re: Star Wars: Episode VII (2015) Discussion Thread

I wonder if lens flare will be used to cover the returning cast ages.

Like everytime Han in his Hoth costume turns to the camera all we see is this:

Han has midichlorians blasting out of his eyes.. maybe that's the new arc?

Han learns the ways of the force, Leia gets annoyed because he can't stop playing with his lightsaber.. Luke gets the ****s & goes to Dagobah again for some time away from them to start a leisure camp for retired Jedi.