Star Wars: The Last Jedi (2)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Sucky Trilogy

Stupid Trilogy

Sad Trilogy

Silly Trilogy

Shouldn't-a-been Trilogy

Superfluous Trilogy

Umm, some of those might be considered beyond opinion and therefore... FACT.:lecture:lol

There's also:

Sanctimonious Trilogy

Squandered Trilogy

Spoon-fed Trilogy

Suicidal Trilogy

Stagnant Trilogy

Slanderous Trilogy

Smug Trilogy

Sham (or another four-letter word that begins with "Sh") Trilogy
 
My guess is he predicted the long line of posts using ST for a joke.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
In case anyone is unfamiliar with what is stated in the board's Code of Conduct...

But is there a CoC rule against stating your opinion as fact? This seems to come up a lot (with references to CoC) and yet it doesn't actually seem to be a rule - the trolling or flaming or disrespect that may stem from it are against the rules, but not simply stating your opinion as fact - even over and over.

It's a bit like "threadcrapping" - without personal subjective opinion (ie whether you like what the person is posting negatively about or not) driving it, there doesn't seem to be any clear definition of what "threadcrapping" is, even though there's a constant reference to that "threadcrapping" original posting that Khev made.
 
Back
Top