And therein lies the fallacy of these preconceived ideals. Kylo Ren, the Knights of Ren, Snoke... they are not Sith. Even though Snoke was loosely using Sith teachings as a template for his rule, he likely considered himself beyond the Sith, due to his huge ego.
Abrams intentionally made them all ambiguous, to match the original trilogy. He wanted to capture some of the mystery that those films initially had.
George Lucas’ biggest failing was his constant desire to explain away and overanalyze all of his concepts. Sure, there is now a ton of lore about the Sith and the Jedi and the Universe is relatively better off for it. However, I also think you can become trapped by it. Especially if no one can step out of what’s become the established order, without some kind of volatile backlash.
That's fine. I mean of course Sith are the best embodiment we've had imo, but there can be other dark side users. The only issue for now is that they are leaving us with zero explanation as to where this new non-Sith approach came from. You are right though, maybe we shouldn't expect what Lucas used to do.
Clearly though, the path of learning to 'ultimate power' has to be similar no matter what they call themselves. And btw I feel like they should have established a name by now for what Snoke and Kylo were, it's really annoying to just call them dark side users or other synonyms
Snoke seems to be quite fond of the Sith which is weird, not only the way he mentions Vader but also his ring which has writings connected to the Four Sages of Dwartii, the statues that were in Palpatine's office.
I have no doubt there will be a book or some kind of answers one way or another, we'll see what they come up with to fill in the gaps.
Last edited: