jye4ever
Broke and happy
I like Sassa always makes me lol
RO CGI Carrie was an experiment, Super CGI flying Carrie was a warning, post TLJ CGI Carrie is the future.
RO CGI Carrie was an experiment, Super CGI flying Carrie was a warning, post TLJ CGI Carrie is the future.
It's not about having new heroes. It's about telling coherent stories up to the standard of quality and similar tone and message of the old movies.
The big problem where I take offense to your post is why shouldn't heroes of the past be honored. They aren't "just old people" as you insultingly put it. They should be revered, maintaining thier dignity to the end without having thier legacy sullied by a message deaconstructing hero worship that 100% does not belong in a Star Wars film.
The OT and the PT are not "relics". He'll, the PT is barely 10 years old. They are classic films that are just as relatable to the kids of today as the ones of 40 years ago. This thread is filled with examples of members with kids who continue to love the OT. Those films do not deserve to have thier continuing legacy disrespected or retired to the past they don't belong in yet.
Most Disney cartoons are as old if not older than these films. And the Harry Potter films are just as old as the PT. Are you going to claim those are "relics" that kids don't watch either? Some things just hit that magic spot of being universally appealing to that thier age is literally just a number.
After thinking on it a bit- I think the movie failed with fans due to the intent the director had while writing it. To capture the old Star Wars feeling in TFA JJ basically made a soft remake of ANH. Whereas in TLJ it seemed the only goal was the other extreme and to subvert expectations at the expense of telling a good story.
It seemed every scene was - 'think you can guess what's going to happen, what he/ she is going to do? Guess again!' From snokes demise (and no backstory) to Rey's parentage to Luke throwing away the lightsaber and contemplating killing a child in their sleep etc etc it was all meant to surprise by going against everything that the fans had been guessing.
Ultimately it basically explained nothing though - like why is Rey so strong in the force, and able to take on so much with barely any training, whereas kylo was trained by 2 powerful masters. Where was Snoke this whole time (this is only important as he's shown to be more powerful than the emporer - if he hadn't been more powerful it wouldn't matter who he is, we could believe someone just picked up the pieces of the empire)
Even the title for the first time is a misnomer in SW history. In attack of the clones - that's literally what happend. In empire strikes back - ditto. For all of the original 6 titles. However Luke clearly says 'I will not be the last jedi' and it flashes over to Rey and they show broom kid at the end, even making the title a subversion.
Rian went so far in one direction just so he could one up the audience all the way through, and he succeeded, but the backlash is making it clear the audience doesn't always appreciate that.
Isn't that what Rey is for? Why are you making it about gender?
Flying Leia was stupid, this is coming from someone that loves the spunky OT Leia. They didn't need to give her super powers in the 70s and 80s to make her a powerful character.
Even the title for the first time is a misnomer in SW history. In attack of the clones - that's literally what happend. In empire strikes back - ditto. For all of the original 6 titles. However Luke clearly says 'I will not be the last jedi' and it flashes over to Rey and they show broom kid at the end, even making the title a subversion.
Its also very long at 2 hours and 41 minutes so its losing at least one showing a day (maybe two) at every theater on the planet.
That's gonna hurt the long haul boxoffice.
Isn't that what Rey is for? Why are you making it about gender?
Flying Leia was stupid, this is coming from someone that loves the spunky OT Leia. They didn't need to give her super powers in the 70s and 80s to make her a powerful character.
She's also a Jedi though. Just not one that ever used her powers so obviously before. Getting blown out into space would seem like a good time to do it.
I thought it was fine to give her a moment like that. An acceptable upgrade from just seeing her reacting to someone or an event across the galaxy but not so far as seeing her jumping around with a lightsaber, which, surely we can concede, would have had a lot more faces buried in palms.
Jedi can breath and fly in zero gravity space?
It's not about having new heroes. It's about telling coherent stories up to the standard of quality and similar tone and message of the old movies.
The big problem where I take offense to your post is why shouldn't heroes of the past be honored. They aren't "just old people" as you insultingly put it. They should be revered, maintaining thier dignity to the end without having thier legacy sullied by a message deaconstructing hero worship that 100% does not belong in a Star Wars film.
The OT and the PT are not "relics". He'll, the PT is barely 10 years old. They are classic films that are just as relatable to the kids of today as the ones of 40 years ago. This thread is filled with examples of members with kids who continue to love the OT. Those films do not deserve to have thier continuing legacy disrespected or retired to the past they don't belong in yet.
Most Disney cartoons are as old if not older than these films. And the Harry Potter films are just as old as the PT. Are you going to claim those are "relics" that kids don't watch either? Some things just hit that magic spot of being universally appealing to that thier age is literally just a number.
Enter your email address to join: