I think Grace needs a thread. Would you support a Grace thread? Daily videos of her reviewing and talking about movies.
I think Grace needs a thread. Would you support a Grace thread? Daily videos of her reviewing and talking about movies.
Big Mac is the only thing worth getting at mcdonalds
You're just tryin' to avoid the topic of racism, aren't ya?
It could be waaay worse tho. Let's be thankful that Felicity Jones wasn't in it.
I honestly don't believe for a second that he liked it. There's more to his alleged opinions of TLJ.
I'm thankful she didn't expose herself to the trauma of being involved in TLJ.
It's not the kind of exposure she's used to.
Disney’s books, cartoons, comics and merchandise has been spot on since purchasing LucasArts how in the **** did this screenplay get green lit ? I am in absolute shock at how terrible it really was.....
I'm thankful she didn't expose herself to the trauma of being involved in TLJ.
It's not the kind of exposure she's used to.
he has to tell people and himself that TLJ is only a movie, to not get upset over it
Clearly a lesson to be learned by many.
Hamill get’s a break for being upset because that’s his livelihood / job. Everyone else whining about the handling of a fictional character in a movie speaks volumes about many things......
Chalet Girl! A charming little sports comedy.
I guess it’s not entirely wrong either because if CS asked Wor-Gar and JAWS what they thought they would’ve not given it an A.
That being said this is where the corrupt part comes in.
CS just as easily doesn’t use their negative score and simply jumps to the next positive score.
Disney monies yo.
Now Khev can't think- he's bothered now
It's another case of a split decision on RT, but I'm siding with the critics this time:
Yes. So let's take an up-close look at what makes up that often-cited Rotten Tomatoes "Fresh" rating:
"TOP CRITICS" REVIEW CLASSIFIED AS "FRESH" #1: Variety
What the CLEARLY NEGATIVE review ACTUALLY said:
Headline: "As the fate of the Jedi religion hangs in the balance, one begins to detect a certain unwillingness to stray too far from the official text in the latest 'Star Wars' sequel."
"Johnson’s effort is ultimately a disappointment. If anything, it demonstrates just how effective supervising producer Kathleen Kennedy and the forces that oversee this now Disney-owned property are at molding their individual directors’ visions into supporting a unified corporate aesthetic — a process that chewed up and spat out helmers such as Colin Trevorrow, Gareth Edwards, Phil Lord and Christopher Miller. But Johnson was either strong enough or weak enough to adapt to such pressures, and the result is the longest and least essential chapter in the series."
"It’s as if Johnson’s assignment was to extend the franchise without changing anything fundamental, which is closer to the way classic television and vintage James Bond movies operate than anything George Lucas ever served up. Say what you will about Lucas’ clunky, uneven prequels, but they covered a ton of story ground. By contrast, “The Last Jedi” opens and closes with scenes of Resistance bases under siege, in between which the movie’s central concern is the dwindling fuel level on a carrier ship under slow-motion pursuit by Supreme Leader Snoke (Andy Serkis, who for the first time in his career probably would have been just as effective playing the character without the benefit of motion capture). Even more than last summer’s “Dunkirk,” this movie is about the honor and sacrifice of a successful retreat, which isn’t nearly as dramatic as an underdog offensive."
"The mission here is merely survival, although the tension would be greater if Snoke were doing something other than space-tailgating the Resistance for most of the movie, picking off their smaller ships as they run out of fuel. Now we see him “in the flesh” (technically CG), and he’s repulsive to look at — like accidentally walking in on one of your grandparents au naturel — but not especially fear-inducing, in part because we learn so little about him or his powers."
"Here, the laughs feel forced — as does the appearance of cuddly critters on each new planet. But do audiences have bladders big enough to sit through a talky two-and-a-half-hour tug-of-war between the light and dark sides of the Force?"
"TOP CRITICS" REVIEW CLASSIFIED AS "FRESH" #2: CNN
What the CLEARLY NEGATIVE review ACTUALLY said:
Headline: "'Star Wars: The Last Jedi' falls short of sky-high hopes"
"If expectations for "Star Wars: The Last Jedi" were inordinately (and perhaps unfairly) high, thank "The Force Awakens," which had a huge donut hole in the shape of Luke Skywalker at its center. Yet even with Luke integrated into the story, the film feels like a significant letdown, one that does far less than its predecessor to stoke enthusiasm for the next leg in the trilogy."
"Running more than 2 ½ hours, the eighth "Star Wars" movie built around the Skywalker clan is the longest under that banner and showcases an abundance of action. But despite the enormous scope and visual spectacle, too many key components of the film -- including those that have kept die-hard fans guessing and debating -- prove unsatisfying."
"The eagerly awaited arrival of Luke (Mark Hamill) -- with his promised tutelage of Rey (Daisy Ridley), and past role in the dark descent of Kylo Ren (Adam Driver) -- doesn't ignite as anticipated. While "Force Awakens" did an admirable job of engineering a baton pass by establishing the new cast (the other key members being John Boyega as Finn and Oscar Isaac as Poe), "Last Jedi" bogs down in the middle and, the cooler parts notwithstanding, doesn't rally enough at the finish to offset that."
""The Last Jedi" feels like less than the sum of its parts. The flaws also invite second-guessing about Lucasfilm's pre-release vote of confidence by anointing Johnson as the force behind a separate trilogy set in that far-away galaxy."
"In crass commercial terms, no clairvoyance is necessary to predict that "The Last Jedi" will be a huge hit, blunting any criticism. Yet if "The Empire Strikes Back" stands as the defining chapter in the "Star Wars" saga, as second movies go, "Last Jedi" ranks closer to the "Attack of the Clones" end of the gene pool."
See? SEE???? Audience scores on RT are rubbish.
But as I added, how do they get 79% when the average is 5.8/10?
What sorcery is this?
I know it seem redundant a lot of us complaining about TLJ but this is the biggest movie franchise in cinema history. We all expected more and something that resembled Star Wars. I understand Johnson thought he was groundbreaking by distorting the Star Wars recipe but at the end of the day we wanted something resembled the Galaxy we fell in love with.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yep, it's all a bunch of simple tricks and nonsense.
Enter your email address to join: