Post as many links to pro-feminist groups trying to afix themselves to this movie as you want. This one from the writer and director himself trumps them all:
https://chicago.suntimes.com/entert...-meat-grinder-in-the-last-jedi-director-says/
I saw that headline before I watched the film and I saw his stated intentions playing out exactly like that on screen.
In TFA Poe got to solve problems by blowing them up and was given an extremely long leash by General Leia, even to the point of basically spear-heading the briefing on the Starkiller Base attack despite being just one of the pilots. In TLJ his suped up X-Wing was taken away and his leash was reduced to pretty much nothing.
In TFA Rey had a legendary war hero practically begging her to join him and go adventuring with him but in TLJ the legendary war hero wanted nothing to do with her. Also her inborn power did little to help her when it mattered the most (Snoke's throne room) and she had to basically be saved by the guy she beat up in the first film.
In TFA infiltrating Starkiller Base was pretty much a cake-walk for Finn and he got to have his way with Phasma because Han and Chewie did all the heavy lifting. In TLJ the "scoundrel" character that helped him infiltrate the base flat out betrayed him forcing him to face Phasma one on one.
And so on. So no, just because women's rights/issues are under a particularly bright spotlight at this specific moment in history it does NOT mean that I literally see it everywhere I look. Did anyone cry radical feminisim when Charlie put Maverick in his place? Did anyone cry "anti-white" when Matrix Reloaded introduced a Zion high command that was predominantly black? Did anyone whine that the original SW was anti-United Kingdom because all the bad guys save Vader had British accents compared to the do-gooder American Rebels? Not that I recall.
We currently live in a culture where outrage is an addiction. People must be offended by everything and read way too much into everything. And not joining such silliness does not mean that TLJ went over my head. I let films speak for themselves. I have no need to run to online editorials, actor tweets, or t-shirts worn by exectuive producers to tell me how to watch them. If I'm curious about underlying motives for any given scene I will *always* default to what the actual writer and/or director has to say about it. And so far I've not once read or seen any Rian Johnson interview where he said "yeah I was trying to promote radical feminism" or "I was asked to include a radical feminist agenda by Kathleen Kennedy" or whomever.
Now if you need the editorials of MTV blogs or whatever to tell you what a movie was about then that's fine. But I saw a film that sync'd perfectly with the directors own words that he simply wanted things to be hard for the characters and gave us an organic fulfillment of that very non-political agenda. And no amount of repetitive claims to the contrary are going to suddenly negate that. You're free to keep selling it an additional 6,000 times but I ain't buying it.
I will say this: The *all* female Resistance high command did raise an eyebrow, though no higher than when I saw the black majority command in Matrix Reloaded. Everything else that was supposedly ultra-feminist I just saw as a parallel to many other films that *no one* has ever accused of being feminist (Top Gun included.)
Now is Rian Johnson a firm believer that women should be equally heroic as men? Probably. Did some of his own biases naturally seep into the narrative the way it does for literally all writers? I don't see how they wouldn't have. But simply showcasing some of his own biases does not mean that he was ramming them down anyone's throat.