I actually wouldn't want to see that particular story on the screen, as good as the comic story was. He was just a great, distinctive Spidey villain.Kraven's Last Hunt would be great. Jeffrey Dean Morgan might be a cool choice for him.
I actually wouldn't want to see that particular story on the screen, as good as the comic story was. He was just a great, distinctive Spidey villain.Kraven's Last Hunt would be great. Jeffrey Dean Morgan might be a cool choice for him.
Kraven's Last Hunt would be great. Jeffrey Dean Morgan might be a cool choice for him.
I actually wouldn't want to see that particular story on the screen, as good as the comic story was. He was just a great, distinctive Spidey villain.
I really wouldn't say top though. And to say this movie even compares to that is a stretch. Most of the characters are different and a good chunk of the situations in the story as well. It's losely based at best. Best of the X-Men movies? Debatable. Better than most? Again, debatable. Top comic story? Nope.
DOFP is very weak in the action department.
Wolverine hotel fight was the best action part.
I've had enough X-Men talk in the Spiderman thread, can we change to talking about Fantastic Four now?
LOL. The board certainly isn't the same without Nam..
Cuz unlike everyone else here I didn't expect xmen to fail just cuz " it's not marvel dood" lmao.
The purpose of DofP was to ditch the continuity of the previous films in a way that allows you to use the same characters.
DOFP is very weak in the action department.
Kraven's Last Hunt would be great. Jeffrey Dean Morgan might be a cool choice for him.
Except It didn't ditch it anymore than BTTF ditched the beginning before he went back to 1955 or Star Trek 2009.
Like them it spun the series into a new alternate timeline.
Without the events OT there wouldn't be a future to save and alter to kick start the new timeline. So they still matter to the overall continuity, the details are just different now in the new altered future due to the meddling in the past.
I found the seventies action to be weak but the 2023 action to be fantastic.
I could so see him as Kraven.
Nam's point and reason for comparison to Dallas is that Dallas wrote the plot to be able to ignore killing off a fav character..... Make it all a dream so we can write ourselves out of a corner... I don't believe it was always meant to be a dream.
"It is notoriously difficult to resurrect a character who is shown to die on a hospital bed, with medical instruments clearly registering his death, and is then buried in a fully attended funeral. Duffy did not intend to return to Dallas, and for the season that followed, every effort was invested into continuing storylines without even the possibility of a return from the dead by Bobby.
Dallas' viewership declined in the 1985-6 season, and prevailing belief at CBS was that the loss of Bobby was the cause for the television show's decreasing popularity."
DoFP was able to do the same thing so that we could ignore and pretend that the bad movies and choices they made never happened.
BTTF had a plan from the beginning it was the point of the story... When they killed Cyclops in 3 they did not think.... Well we will bring him back in DOFP... It was a Dallas move.
Nam's point and reason for comparison to Dallas is that Dallas wrote the plot to be able to ignore killing off a fav character..... Make it all a dream so we can write ourselves out of a corner... I don't believe it was always meant to be a dream.
"It is notoriously difficult to resurrect a character who is shown to die on a hospital bed, with medical instruments clearly registering his death, and is then buried in a fully attended funeral. Duffy did not intend to return to Dallas, and for the season that followed, every effort was invested into continuing storylines without even the possibility of a return from the dead by Bobby.
Dallas' viewership declined in the 1985-6 season, and prevailing belief at CBS was that the loss of Bobby was the cause for the television show's decreasing popularity."
DoFP was able to do the same thing so that we could ignore and pretend that the bad movies and choices they made never happened.
BTTF had a plan from the beginning it was the point of the story... When they killed Cyclops in 3 they did not think.... Well we will bring him back in DOFP... It was a Dallas move.
Okay guys I'll give you the Dallas thing. Definitely a contrived plot twist introduced way into the series instead of as a major theme from the get go. Kind of cool to see that done in a big budget franchise though. I wouldn't even say that Star Trek did it first because that show had lots of episodes with time travel prior to Abrams' 2009 reboot.
You mean by using Red Matter again and going back to stop Nero from killing Kirks dad?
Or the sling-shot around the sun at warp thing that they did in Star Trek IV, which Spock pioneered in fact. Why did he use time travel to save Earth and yet not use time travel to save his own planet? Especially when the abuse of time travel was what led to his planet's destruction in the first place. Surely that is something that should be rectified.
It was so ****ing dark. Dematteis and Zeck were a great team, and that story was no exception, but I just wouldn't care to see it. Besides, to set that up you would need to really establish Kraven beforehand, and realistically I don't see a Spidey movie franchise that will: A) build up Kraven enough to the point where Last Hunt would have the dramatic effect it is supposed to; and B) then revisit that character again where he is the primary (or sole) antagonist in the film. I could imagine it if we had a Spidey tv series.
at Nova's meme, very good.
But yeah once I thought of it I could never let it go, kinda ruins the Trek reboot for me now. And STID was complete cack anyway, pissing all over pretty much everything. So new Trek is dead to me.
Enter your email address to join: