The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread- Open SPOILERS -enter at own risk!

[Wake]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

anyone figure out why the austrailian version is 7 second longer?

 

[Spartan Rex]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

I wouldn't mind that as long as they don't get overly carried away with the size changes like the Ang Lee version of the Hulk.

Also, I am glad that they still haven't shown and given away the alien invaders. Too many trailers give every thing away and I am fine not seeing them yet.

She definitely shares her cookies in the comics. Wizard did a flowchart once of who she has slept with in the Marvel U, I believe it was a gatefold.

Hercules ruined her for every one else.

They should kill her off ala The Ultimates and make room for the real Scarlett....Witch.

 

[jye4ever]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

anyone figure out why the austrailian version is 7 second longer?

I wish mine was 7 second longer

 

[The Mike]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

anyone figure out why the austrailian version is 7 second longer?

To counterbalance for the flipping upside down.

 

[Ziggie]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

She's a ****

 

[skeemer]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Well, you are aware that RDJ went to Joss and said "I think Iron Man should be the focus" so come on, what do you expect? Though Joss Whedon will NEVER make 1 character the full focus (he never has with anything), I am sure he did a few things here in there to quiet RDJ down.

Yea but i mean we seen Iron man already. 2 movies and Cap 1. Would love for it to be focused on Cap or all equally. Anyways that trailed kicks ass. Cant wait

 

[meanstreak]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Isn't the thing about Black Widow:

Spoiler

Her being a double agent secretly working for Russia?

 

[ExMem-LarjaThwei]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

So she's slept with Daredevil, Tony, Hawkeye, Iceman..and a few others I've never heard of.

...but isn't she like a million years old...?

 

[ChaserFan]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

anyone figure out why the austrailian version is 7 second longer?

Because Marvel like us more...I thought that was obvious

 

[jye4ever]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

So she's slept with Daredevil, Tony, Hawkeye, Iceman..and a few others I've never heard of.

...but isn't she like a million years old...?

Ahhh...good ole comic books

 

[jye4ever]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

When's the reboot for Avengers anyways.

 

[Spartan Rex]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Isn't the thing about Black Widow:

Spoiler

Her being a double agent secretly working for Russia?

That was the Ultimates take on her.

 

[ZaCHw117]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

When's the reboot for Avengers anyways.

Next summer

 

[Centurion]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

There isn't even a parallel between Ed Norton who did alright as Banner but was already half out of the door before the film was out to Downey who by that point would have not only played Stark four times but really made the character his own.

I don't really think Norton would be a good Stark at all. RDJ sets a big role to fill if he ever decides to part with it. Anyways enough with the negative thinking....commence with the awesome stuff.

Woah, woah, woah!

I didn't mean if RDJ is cut Paramount/Marvel would put Norton as Stark. Hell no!

Believe me, I think RDJ "IS" Stark and I agree. He's really made the character we see today.

All I'm saying is, I don't believe a studio is going to bend over for RDJ demanding an exorbitant contract. You guys say they will pay out the nose? I don't think so. If the studios need to re-cast, they will.

You guys make it sound like Jr's going to win Best Actor for his role as Iron Man.

 

[Darth Caedus]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOjyxl7On-Q

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qUUHbC1aZg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J5HJogYwVNo&feature=channel

VERY COOL !!!!!

 

[hunnipot85]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

When's the reboot for Avengers anyways.

10 years.

 

[Centurion]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

anyone figure out why the austrailian version is 7 second longer?

To explain to them what just happened.

 

[Darth Caedus]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

10 years.

I'll take the under on that....5 years TOPS. I even heard that they want Justin Bieber to take over the role of Cap

 

[ZaCHw117]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Woah, woah, woah!

I didn't mean if RDJ is cut Paramount/Marvel would put Norton as Stark. Hell no!

Believe me, I think RDJ "IS" Stark and I agree. He's really made the character we see today.

All I'm saying is, I don't believe a studio is going to bend over for RDJ demanding an exorbitant contract. You guys say they will pay out the nose? I don't think so. If the studios need to re-cast, they will.

You guys make it sound like Jr's going to win Best Actor for his role as Iron Man.

I know huh, that's as crazy as him getting a nod for something like Tropic Thunder. Like that would have ever of happened.

 

[Matt S]

Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Trailer was awesome. Movie is gonna make a butt load of cash. Hulk looked pretty damn good in this one