The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread- Open SPOILERS -enter at own risk!

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

anyone figure out why the austrailian version is 7 second longer?
 
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

I wouldn't mind that as long as they don't get overly carried away with the size changes like the Ang Lee version of the Hulk.

Also, I am glad that they still haven't shown and given away the alien invaders. Too many trailers give every thing away and I am fine not seeing them yet.

She definitely shares her cookies in the comics. Wizard did a flowchart once of who she has slept with in the Marvel U, I believe it was a gatefold.

Hercules ruined her for every one else.

They should kill her off ala The Ultimates and make room for the real Scarlett....Witch.
 
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Well, you are aware that RDJ went to Joss and said "I think Iron Man should be the focus" so come on, what do you expect? Though Joss Whedon will NEVER make 1 character the full focus (he never has with anything), I am sure he did a few things here in there to quiet RDJ down.

Yea but i mean we seen Iron man already. 2 movies and Cap 1. Would love for it to be focused on Cap or all equally. Anyways that trailed kicks ass. Cant wait
 
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Isn't the thing about Black Widow:

Her being a double agent secretly working for Russia?
 
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

So she's slept with Daredevil, Tony, Hawkeye, Iceman..and a few others I've never heard of.

...but isn't she like a million years old...?
 
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

There isn't even a parallel between Ed Norton who did alright as Banner but was already half out of the door before the film was out to Downey who by that point would have not only played Stark four times but really made the character his own.

I don't really think Norton would be a good Stark at all. RDJ sets a big role to fill if he ever decides to part with it. Anyways enough with the negative thinking....commence with the awesome stuff.

Woah, woah, woah!

I didn't mean if RDJ is cut Paramount/Marvel would put Norton as Stark. Hell no! :lol

Believe me, I think RDJ "IS" Stark and I agree. He's really made the character we see today.

All I'm saying is, I don't believe a studio is going to bend over for RDJ demanding an exorbitant contract. You guys say they will pay out the nose? I don't think so. If the studios need to re-cast, they will.

You guys make it sound like Jr's going to win Best Actor for his role as Iron Man. :slap :rotfl
 
Re: The Avengers: The Motion Picture Discussion Thread

Woah, woah, woah!

I didn't mean if RDJ is cut Paramount/Marvel would put Norton as Stark. Hell no! :lol

Believe me, I think RDJ "IS" Stark and I agree. He's really made the character we see today.

All I'm saying is, I don't believe a studio is going to bend over for RDJ demanding an exorbitant contract. You guys say they will pay out the nose? I don't think so. If the studios need to re-cast, they will.

You guys make it sound like Jr's going to win Best Actor for his role as Iron Man. :slap :rotfl

:lol

I know huh, that's as crazy as him getting a nod for something like Tropic Thunder. Like that would have ever of happened.
 
Back
Top