Oh so Wolverine is literally invincible now. Wow way to go Marvel.![]()
When was this a new concept?
Well since 1989 at least. He was fighting Tigershark underwater and T grabbed his wrists and swam to the bottom of the ocean and jammed his claws deep into the rock and Wolverine couldn't pull them out. He commented (through a thought balloon obviously) that his healing factor wouldn't prevent him from drowning and he started to black out until he went berserk and shredded the rocks in a panicked fury. It was kind of cool to see a villain actually come up with a way to kill him.
![]()
I know we're talking comics here, and not movies, so you'll probably crucify me for this, but couldn't Batman take down Wolverine the same way Wolverine took down Lady Deathstrike (adamantium overload)?
Wait, so Batman couldn't turn Wolverine into a giant paperweight by coating his soft tissue in adamantium, blocking it from actually functioning?![]()
Wolverine is way too much of a meathead to defeat Batman.
In the comics Bane isn't much of a meathead though.
Nam, I don't think anyone is debating that Wolverine couldn't tear Batman a new *******. I'm just pointing out that it would NOT go down like in the video. That Bats makes Christian Bale's Batman look like Sherlock-****ing Holmes.
The suffocation theory is out. He's been all but burned to a crisp (there's no oxygen in an inferno), drowned and washed up on shore, even had his brain turned to jelly by Hulk during WWH (who admitted that he likely couldn't stop Wolvy with his healing factor). Batman would only prolong the inevitable using adamantium armor. And finding something that might slow Wolvy's healing factor is at best a gamble. In the end, the one thing that gives Wolverine the edge is that he will kill. Something Batman, can't and won't do.
That theory only applies if you assume Wolverine has the strength with which to do so. And to that, you'd be incorrect. Sorry to pull out my nerd card, but stainless steel metal claws can't rip through stainless steel metal plating, unless excessive force, or velocity, is applied to the plating or it is stretched too thin. Adamantium doesn't magically cut through itself by that logic.Wolverine could cut through the armor. Adamantium = Adamantium
Nam, I don't think anyone is debating that Wolverine couldn't tear Batman a new *******. I'm just pointing out that it would NOT go down like in the video. That Bats makes Christian Bale's Batman look like Sherlock-****ing Holmes.
For pete's sake, this Batman essentially just spots Wolverine, who is dressed up like a freakshow, so red flags should already be going off in his head. Then, he watches him for a moment and decides to strike, essentially losing the battle upon executing his sneak attack, due to having little to no advantage over Wolverine. He jumped the gun and got caught with his pants down.... something "Batman" is rarely ever caught doing.
That theory only applies if you assume Wolverine has the strength with which to do so. And to that, you'd be incorrect. Sorry to pull out my nerd card, but stainless steel metal claws can't rip through stainless steel metal plating, unless excessive force, or velocity, is applied to the plating or it is stretched too thin. Adamantium doesn't magically cut through itself by that logic.
How would he manage the injection process with something Wolverine's incapable of cutting through?
Couldn't he just throw Wolvie into a vat of the stuff while it's hot, and then cool it down, turning Wolverine into a glorified sculpture?
Nice.
But what was so great about 1982? ET and Poltergeist is all I remember. I also remember that summer being a disappointment after 5 years of amazing movies - Star Wars, Alien, Empire, Raiders.... and then E.T.???? Seemed sappy to me at the time much like Titanic did. And Avatar. 1984 or 1989 were much bigger, busier years packed with high expectations.
But I agree with the review of this year.