Devil_666
Super Freak
Battleship >>>>>>>>>> TDKR
Yeah, but being slightly smaller doesn't really mean anything. Bane fights very dirty and rough. Besides, there are smaller guys out there that can easily throw greater punches than big body builders.Some kind of genetic anamorph? Or take it a step further and infuse some SciFi and say that as a result of improperly splicing his own DNA, since his genetic strands are incomplete, he somehow has complete control over them and can change and rearrange them how he sees fit? If you buy a genetically smaller man like Bane pummeling the hell out of a physically bigger, highly trained ninja with technologically advanced weaponry, it's not that far of a stretch.
Not going to read that thread, but it appears it's a "what's your favorite" thread, not a "vs" thread. Unless people turned it into one, lol.I'm gonna take it that you haven't seen this thread here.
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showthread.php?t=112769
People do this quite often.
Not going to read that thread, but it appears it's a "what's your favorite" thread, not a "vs" thread. Unless people turned it into one, lol.
Not going to read that thread, but it appears it's a "what's your favorite" thread, not a "vs" thread. Unless people turned it into one, lol.
What's the difference?
SnakeDoc
That's anything though. It could be Star Wars or LOTR or the Bourne franchise. It's just people. And the more there are, the more ____ you see.Negative review results in death threats
https://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/dark-knight-rises-critic-receives-death-threats#.UAR8P4l5nTr
I always knew there was a lunatic element to fans of this franchise. Anything negative said is jumped on. Just look at these idiots.
Negative review results in death threats
https://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/dark-knight-rises-critic-receives-death-threats#.UAR8P4l5nTr
I always knew there was a lunatic element to fans of this franchise. Anything negative said is jumped on. Just look at these idiots.
The 1989/BTAS batmobiles had to have the hook-claw on the lamp post to get it round a corner remember
I kinda Agree, and I know Burton's Batmobile is Iconic and the most known by people in general, but I never really liked it as much, yes it looks cool but in some scenes it looks stupid, like to turn around it needs a chain to link to a wall.... not very practical.
Negative review results in death threats
https://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/dark-knight-rises-critic-receives-death-threats#.UAR8P4l5nTr
I always knew there was a lunatic element to fans of this franchise. Anything negative said is jumped on. Just look at these idiots.
Negative review results in death threats
https://blogs.indiewire.com/criticwire/dark-knight-rises-critic-receives-death-threats#.UAR8P4l5nTr
I always knew there was a lunatic element to fans of this franchise. Anything negative said is jumped on. Just look at these idiots.
I don't understand how those work? so does someone just call and say "Ima Keel You MotherFooter" that counts as death threat? or are they more serious? more detailed telling him what his car or house look like and stuff?
does any person saying "Ima keel this Sonabirch" counts as a threat?
I think the guy was trolling for reaction -- he starts his review off with a shot at fans of Nolan's movies (there are spoilers in the review, FYI). The drooling fanboys just gave him what he wanted ... a couple of half-assed "death threats" (mostly not-cleverly regurgitated Bane quotes) to make him headlines and get him hits.
Stupid but symbiotic. Let 'em have each other.
Most of the "threats" are "your punishment must be more severe", or "you have my permission to die" ... blah, blah, blah. Mindless drivel from twelve-year-old nerds, not actual threats.
SnakeDoc
That's not Clayface.
Yeah, the whole thing is stupid.
Personally I think they should just cut out the ability to leave comments on review from Rotten Tomatoes. I don't need to see someone's reaction of someone's reaction to a film, positive or negative. It just unnecessary.
Just ditch the comments feature.
I think the guy was trolling for reaction -- he starts his review off with a shot at fans of Nolan's movies (there are spoilers in the review, FYI). The drooling fanboys just gave him what he wanted ... a couple of half-assed "death threats" (mostly not-cleverly regurgitated Bane quotes) to make him headlines and get him hits.
Stupid but symbiotic. Let 'em have each other.
Most of the "threats" are "your punishment must be more severe", or "you have my permission to die" ... blah, blah, blah. Mindless drivel from twelve-year-old nerds, not actual threats.
SnakeDoc
You guys are exaggerating about the grappling hook. Batman uses it one time in the first and second film. He's doing 70 down a street in a chase from Joker goons and the GCPD. There's a sharp turn that he has to make at this speed, hence the grapple hook.
I've seen this on other discussions too. People make it sound like the Batmibile relies on the hook swing for every turn. What about Returns when he evades the cops or even most of the chase in '89? He doesn't use the grapple for turning there.
And if you want to get on the '89 Batmobile for it's coincidental gadgets, get on the 60s show and Begins/TDK Batmobile too. The 60s one had a gadget for every situation. Begins is a bridging vehicle that just happens to have a friggin motorcycle vehicle with these giant canons. What a coincidence right?
That's the character from his 70 plus years of history. He always has a tool for any situation and the Batmibile is his greatest gadget. Impractical or not.
Enter your email address to join: