jye4ever
Broke and happy
Actually Lee Pace was riding a real horse they just mo-capped it and painted an elk over it.
Actually Lee Pace was riding a real horse they just mo-capped it and painted an elk over it.
Actually Lee Pace was riding a real horse they just mo-capped it and painted an elk over it.
It was a real horse with branches duct taped to its head
Bilbo: "Then the prophecies of the old songs have turned out to be true after all, after a fashion!"
Gandalf: "Of course! And why should not they prove true? Surely you don't disbelieve the prophecies, because you had a hand in bringing them about yourself? You don't really suppose, do you, that all your adventures and escapes were managed by mere luck, just for your sole benefit? You are a very fine person Mr. Baggins, and I am very fond of you, but you are only quite a little fellow in a wide world after all!"
"Thank goodness!" said Bilbo laughing, and handed him the tobacco-jar.
#1 in the US for its second full weekend and already #8 for the year. In the next week or so it'll pass DOFP and Maleficent. I imagine it'll end up 3rd overall for the year between GOTG and TWS. Not too shabby. When I saw it yesterday it still had a good crowd. I think tons of people are quietly enjoying this one despite the vocal minority criticizing it. I see that on rottentomatoes it's got a 78% audience approval rating and Cinemascore of A-.
The other thing to consider is that no one in the world is complaining about Smaug being cgi
No one in the world is complaining about the eagles being cgi
If you want to think of other movies, no one ever complained about the prawns from district 9, the dementors from Harry potter, rocket and groot
..
Fantasy having cgi creature wonders is pretty well accepted. The problem is how it id used or when it replaces things it didn't need to the way I am legend replaced the vampires with CGI for no good reason
Then it becomes too obvious and it becomes awful
Most fake horses look terrible. There were a few instances of that in LotR too.
I feel the same way with CGI. I give it a pass in Sci Fi and Fantasy movies, but I hate all the fake explosions and fake blood splatter that they're using now. Right off the top of my head what The Expendables. Those explosions were terrible in that.
All that really terrible CGI in the movies on SyFy. I can't stand it, but my mother watches a lot of those movies and enjoys them. She's not spoiled like some of us are.
People are claiming that Dain ended up being CG due to a particularly bad spell Bill Connoly had with his Parkinson's disease during filming. Rather than recast another actor PJ opted to keep Connoly's recorded dialogue and CG'd the character around it. Battling both cancer and Parkinson's at the same time occasionally wipes Connoly out.
In The Hobbit: The Battle of The Five Armies, why was Dain the dwarf a completely CGI character? : movies
IF that is true then I can at least count that as an example of PJ's heart being in the right place even if it was at the expense of the end result. This wouldn't be the first time PJ has had to watch an actor suffer from the disease on his watch. Michael J. Fox's symptoms first manifested when he was filming The Frighteners and Ian Holm suffers from it as well so I could see PJ being particularly sensitive to the disease.
Prostate. He was actually diagnosed with both cancer and Parkinsons the same day. It sounds like since filming his Hobbit scenes (or recording the dialogue as it turned out) he did get the "all clear" on the cancer following a successful surgery but obviously the Parkinson's will continue to take it's toll.
"Some months later we had a second round of design on Dain when Peter asked us to conceive him without the restrictions of costume and make-up. What had been achieved on Actor Billy Connolly with the prosthetic make-up and costume was cool, but it hadn't given Peter, Fran and Philippa exactly what they wanted from the character and we all felt that Billy had become a bit lost under it all. Paradoxically, if Dain were entirely digital we could bring more of Billy to the front of the new design brief. At the same time we could shift his proportions in subtle ways that costume could only achieve to a certain degree. We were able to broaden him, enlarge his head in relation to his body and make him feel chunkier, without encumbering Billy's performance the way a heavy costume, armor and prosthetics had."
From the reddit link, a quote from the Hobbit Chronicles book:
This sounds less like the Parkinson's theory and more like Peter Jackson wanting to yet again do more CGI, like Azog and Bolg. What a shame.
From the reddit link, a quote from the Hobbit Chronicles book:
This sounds less like the Parkinson's theory and more like Peter Jackson wanting to yet again do more CGI, like Azog and Bolg. What a shame.
If it was a decision made because Connoly's health was affecting the performance they wouldn't come out and say that in a making of book anyway it would be considered disrespectful to the actor and in my opinion very distasteful. To say it was one thing or the other at this stage is just speculation, we likely won't know until the documentaries in the extended editions and even then they may not talk too candidly about it out of respect for Billy.
With all due respect, the whole Parkinson's theory/rumor/whatever you want to call it was a fan made explanation for why Dain was CGI. Yes, Billy Connolly has Parkinson's, but we have no reason to believe that's why he was CGI'd. Parkinson's has plagued some members of my family. It is controllable for a time, a long time in many cases. Connolly was diagnosed and treated in September 2013 for the initial symptoms, which are not debilitating and would unlikely affect his physical performance - especially since he likely would've filmed his scenes well before then.
Enter your email address to join: