The Order: 1866 (PS4)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I want the evidence/proof that plenty of people want 30fps over 60. Please post it if there are so many examples. You cant just post a blanket plenty to support your arguement, people dont care about opinion, they want the facts.
 
No one ever said anything about people wanting 30fps OVER 60fps.

People haven't grasped the concept of 30fps as a style choice yet, it's too hard to understand.
 
It reminds me a bit of when Resistance Fall of Man came out as a flagship release title for PS3... Take a developer known for a completely different franchise, and make a shooter with a completely different theme. I really liked RFOM at the time. Shame they dropped the narrative style for the sequels, and turned R2 into a bit of a Halo game..
 
R3’s campaign was pretty good, much better than 2, but then they ruined the multiplayer.
 
R3’s campaign was pretty good, much better than 2, but then they ruined the multiplayer.

As a game it was very enjoyable, but still didn't feel like RFOM... off the top of my head I can't think of another trilogy where all 3 games are all so different..
 
Ah, yea I definitely agree, all three games felt like they were made by entirely different teams. ROFM was definitely the highlight of the franchise.
 
It reminds me a bit of when Resistance Fall of Man came out as a flagship release title for PS3... Take a developer known for a completely different franchise, and make a shooter with a completely different theme. I really liked RFOM at the time. Shame they dropped the narrative style for the sequels, and turned R2 into a bit of a Halo game..

I agree. Resistance was one of the first games I bought with my PS3 (I was a little late with my PS3 purchase), and at the time I loved the style of the game. Part 2 just left a sour taste in my mouth as I felt it was way too much like every other shooter out there.
 
Collector's Edition Statue pics:

10649862_10152722107751803_844690822295847994_n.jpg


1610784_10152722107736803_5118776100576073551_n.jpg


10428059_10152722107741803_52508586957193172_n.jpg


10384024_10152722107701803_4396360970938375725_n.jpg
 
I have serious concerns that this game will pull an 'infamous 2nd son,' move. Meaning, its pretty as a console can be, but it has terrible gameplay. Hope I am wrong.
 
I have serious concerns that this game will pull an 'infamous 2nd son,' move. Meaning, its pretty as a console can be, but it has terrible gameplay. Hope I am wrong.

https://www.ign.com/articles/2014/0...for-one-thing?abthid=54034e48f0aca7ce7d000003

I just read this article from IGN saying the shooting sections they've demoed didn't "feel" great. The shooting isn't very accurate. This is very concerning for a 3rd person shooter. I really hope this isnt the case as i would be horribly gutted for this game to turn out only "O.k"

here an excerpt:

My main weapon in the demo was the Thermite Rifle, a machine gun that also fired off explosive-flares. I loved the small detail of how the flare would corkscrew through the air on its way to my target, but igniting the explosive never gave me the desired effect. Blasts right on top of enemies didn’t seem to faze them, and certain explosions would cause structural damage while others seemed to just be bursts of light. So I instead decided to focus on picking them off with my rifle. The problem here was that the bullets spread out in such a wide area so quickly, that I could burst-fire an entire clip at an enemy across a street and have every single bullet miss its target.

Trying to pick off the seemingly-endless droves of enemies became a Sisyphean task until I switched over to my tiny pistol sidearm, which didn’t feel all-that great to use, but at least did a better job at dispatching the enemies. As I made my way through the town to my eventual destination, I couldn’t help but compare my progression to an early-'70s Disneyland attraction. Enemies would pop in and out of cover, but exhibited the lack-of awareness and sense of self-preservation of an animatronic. The feedback I received from a direct hit didn’t feel empowering, but rather like when your laser-sight would get close enough to a node in a shooting gallery.
 
I have serious concerns that this game will pull an 'infamous 2nd son,' move. Meaning, its pretty as a console can be, but it has terrible gameplay. Hope I am wrong.
Things don't sound promising for The Order, but I thought Infamous had fantastic gameplay; I can't recall any review that had any bad things to say about Second Son's gameplay, either.
 
What I have seen so far from The Order seems a bit boring to be honest. A lot of people also don't seem to be very impressed at the moment. Really hoping for the game to do well enough to give me enough reasons to throw down the cash for the CEs.
 
Its more for the atmosphere, beautiful art design, original world, cinematic presentation and gorgeous graphics.

Even if the game is only alright Im still gonna get it for the above mentioned reasons.
 
Things don't sound promising for The Order, but I thought Infamous had fantastic gameplay; I can't recall any review that had any bad things to say about Second Son's gameplay, either.

The enemies were quite boring. And i didn't find the story very engaging. 7/10
My friend says the same for WatchDogs, that its quite repetitive. 7/10

While 7/10 isnt bad i will still be extremely dissapointed to find the Order is a 7. The darker scene shown made it look like a brilliant survival horror, so hopefully there alot of that
 
In fear of contradicting myself. I think the most important aspect of a game is gameplay. If its gameplay sucks no matter how good everything else is the overall game is poor. Alternatively if the gameplay is amazing and everything else sucks its still an awesome game
 
Back
Top