This thread has not been closed....yet.
It has however had the last 3 pages removed so please get back on topic and play nice without insulting each other.
Thanks
x
Oh, and Daiky is awesome
I understand there is always going to be some hype leading into a big fight, but seriously....how many fighters go into a fight openly acknowedging their opponent is better at certain fighting aspects? Sure it happens, but not all that often. Call me gullible, but GSP has always been open and honest when discussing fights or fighters so regardless of the hype if he says he felt Koschek was a better striker, then I'm going to take him at his word. Just like I believe him when he says Shields has superior jiu jitsu skills.
In the latest prime time shows or interviews, GSP says that Jake Shields is his "toughest" opponent ever. You really believe that?
. Shields may or may not be the most dangerous guy GSP's ever faced, but I do know one thing....all he ever did over a 6 year period was win every fight he had 
GSP is an over cautious, decision whore. Too many Canadians love him because he is simply a Canadian champion. I wonder if he voted Bloc (Quebec's separatist political party)
Whose GSP fought that is any more dangerous than Shields? Fitch who he destroyed for 5 straight rounds? BJ [no mas] Penn, who challenged GSP's heart only to quit between rounds
You really should learn how to read. Or was my stating Koschek as being a better striker before the GSP fight [based on GSP's own words], but acknowledging GSP as clearly a better striker now not clear enough for you?
But does any of this before/after arguement really matter? My point in bring up Koschek in the first place was that GSP looked fantastic in taking apart Koschek with his striking game whereas he looked terrible when striking with Shields, a clearly inferior striker to Koschek. And I don't think you have to be a brain surgeon to figure out GSP's performance against Shields had nothing to do with his, or his opponent's striking ability, and everything to do with the fact he couldn't see out of his left eye.....something which certain individuals around here seem incapable of figuring out.
YOu really get off on painting GSP as the victim or some kind of underdog dont you?
As you said, GSP couldnt see out of his left eye and he still made Shields look like the UFC found a random guy off the street and threw him in the octagon. But yet you seem to agree with GSP that Shields is/was his most dangerous opponent out of everyone he's ever fought....LOL, get those GSP colored glasses off. or maybe you've got his jockstrap on your face instead?
Whose GSP fought that is any more dangerous than Shields? Fitch who he destroyed for 5 straight rounds? BJ [no mas] Penn, who challenged GSP's heart only to quit between rounds
Would you care to provide the quote where I said that.....or would you prefer to continue blowing smoke out your a$$ and make things up as you go along? And since you were the one to bring up the issue of GSP's most dangerous opponent....then why don't you answer the question I asked in the 1st place. Again, who has GSP fought that is more dangerous? Feel free to name any other guys he's faced who've won 15 straight fights, or who've gone 6 years between loses......Can't think of anyone? OK, then why don't you name the UFC challenger whose even won a single round fighting GSP since his loss to Serra?
No, Canadians love him because he is the UFC welterweight champion and because he conducts himself with class and dignity both inside and outside the ring. Anymore stupid comments youl'd like to make?...
What butt crack crapped you out? Anything anyone says that you don't agree with sends you over the edge. It's pretty funny. Chill the ____ out.
