Wonder Woman - June 2, 2017

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
The Rogue One re-shoots were done by Gareth, not someone meddling in his movie to make it better, and only after he was given the OK to kill off the characters. He never thought Disney would allow him, but when Kathleen Kennedy thought it was great, he scrambled to redo what he originally wanted to do. So Rogue One is pretty dark in everyone dies. So Disney can and has made dark movies.

Don't remember any one article stating the DC execs attitude. It was rumour and talked about while the whole Affleck dropping out of Batman directing was floating around, and all the backlash BvS was getting. Again, just rumours, but very plausible do to all the negative press yet the movie being a success. WB has made a lot of bad decisions.. King Arthur, anyone???

When Disney acquired Marvel they were already successful with 2 movies. Iron Man, and Hulk, and Thor was in full production and nearly done. Feige was already involved and proved himself. I'm sure the Disney execs had discussions with Feige and were involved, but they didn't give him demands to change things.

From Variety " Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige notes that, despite running “the whole shebang” of the Disney company, Iger finds time to “read every script and have notes on every script.” The CEO also watches raw footage from films, giving “very good” notes on all of the works in progress."
(https://variety.com/2016/film/news/bob-iger-disney-pixar-marvel-lucasfilm-1201923672/)

While BvS is a stand alone movie, they tried awful hard to link to MOS. They literally inserted footage from MOS into the movie. They had to define why Batman hates and distrusts Superman to understand his motives and plot for the whole movie! How would the movie make any sense if those scenes were not their, or you hadn't already seen MOS?? And it clearly is also a subliminal setup for the upcoming JL. You honestly can't say that the scene with Wonder Woman reading an email wasn't shoehorned in for other movies. It served absolutely no plot point nor progression of BvS' story. Marvel did it subtly with teasers at the end of the credits, not forcing it into the movie. To this day I'm still amazed at how many people walk out of Marvel movies once the credits start and miss the teasers. It just baffles me every time.

DC does have their own formula, but they continually poked Marvel and saying how they were doing it better, and they're movies were more real and grounded and set in the real world. Snyder was the biggest bragger of all. Thus why the constant comparison to Marvel. DC just should have said, "good luck and great work so far Marvel, we hope we can be as successful." Hubris is a killer in many a fable and real life.

The money from Wonder Woman will help them make more movies, but doesn't mean they'll be any good or as successful. Female Wonder Woman fans aren't gonna flock to Aquaman to watch Mera have a few minutes of screen time. If JL can't make you care about or like Aquaman, Flash or Cyborg, those movies will fail. Marvel had strong leads. All the movies did well on their own, so sequels were justified. DC is already making movies based on characters not even knowing if they will resonate and stick with audience members and fans. I can see a Flash movie, but Aquaman? The exact reason why Marvel has not made Widow, Quick Silver, Scarlet Witch, Hawkeye, Falcon, etc. They are supporting characters part of a whole. Obviously they feel the demand is not there, or they already have too many planned features in the works. They're not rushing their storyline, other than with Spidey, but that's time sensitive due to their agreement with Sony. Which I still don't agree with, but that's a whole other discussion.

I also would love if DC would make Batman as a prequel and show his history leading up to BvS with all the hints in the batcave with Robin and Joker.... But that won't happen cause it won't help sell any other movies. We already know from MOS that Superman is the beginning of the meta human. No one before him. Batman existed, but was a myth for only those in Gotham. So a prequel Batman is already limited in they can't really introduce any other heroes. Unless of course, like FOX X-Men movies, they couldn't give a crap about continuity and cohesiveness.... Which in all likely hood is right up there alley.
 
No, a good story saved the DC movie universe.

:lol ... I haven't scene it yet. Most likely going Wednesday night. But seriously, how hard is it t say Wonder Woman is the best DC movie, while it's only company is MOS, BvS, and SS... All 3 movies panned by critics (FYI I like MOS, but feel it was ruined by BvS). It wasn't hard to to top those 3. And I have a feeling it will continue to be DC's best even after JL, Fishboy and Flash/crystal robot guy duo teamup of the century are released...
 
The Rogue One re-shoots were done by Gareth, not someone meddling in his movie to make it better, and only after he was given the OK to kill off the characters. He never thought Disney would allow him, but when Kathleen Kennedy thought it was great, he scrambled to redo what he originally wanted to do. So Rogue One is pretty dark in everyone dies. So Disney can and has made dark movies.

Don't remember any one article stating the DC execs attitude. It was rumour and talked about while the whole Affleck dropping out of Batman directing was floating around, and all the backlash BvS was getting. Again, just rumours, but very plausible do to all the negative press yet the movie being a success. WB has made a lot of bad decisions.. King Arthur, anyone???

When Disney acquired Marvel they were already successful with 2 movies. Iron Man, and Hulk, and Thor was in full production and nearly done. Feige was already involved and proved himself. I'm sure the Disney execs had discussions with Feige and were involved, but they didn't give him demands to change things.

From Variety " Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige notes that, despite running “the whole shebang” of the Disney company, Iger finds time to “read every script and have notes on every script.” The CEO also watches raw footage from films, giving “very good” notes on all of the works in progress."
(https://variety.com/2016/film/news/bob-iger-disney-pixar-marvel-lucasfilm-1201923672/)

While BvS is a stand alone movie, they tried awful hard to link to MOS. They literally inserted footage from MOS into the movie. They had to define why Batman hates and distrusts Superman to understand his motives and plot for the whole movie! How would the movie make any sense if those scenes were not their, or you hadn't already seen MOS?? And it clearly is also a subliminal setup for the upcoming JL. You honestly can't say that the scene with Wonder Woman reading an email wasn't shoehorned in for other movies. It served absolutely no plot point nor progression of BvS' story. Marvel did it subtly with teasers at the end of the credits, not forcing it into the movie. To this day I'm still amazed at how many people walk out of Marvel movies once the credits start and miss the teasers. It just baffles me every time.

DC does have their own formula, but they continually poked Marvel and saying how they were doing it better, and they're movies were more real and grounded and set in the real world. Snyder was the biggest bragger of all. Thus why the constant comparison to Marvel. DC just should have said, "good luck and great work so far Marvel, we hope we can be as successful." Hubris is a killer in many a fable and real life.

The money from Wonder Woman will help them make more movies, but doesn't mean they'll be any good or as successful. Female Wonder Woman fans aren't gonna flock to Aquaman to watch Mera have a few minutes of screen time. If JL can't make you care about or like Aquaman, Flash or Cyborg, those movies will fail. Marvel had strong leads. All the movies did well on their own, so sequels were justified. DC is already making movies based on characters not even knowing if they will resonate and stick with audience members and fans. I can see a Flash movie, but Aquaman? The exact reason why Marvel has not made Widow, Quick Silver, Scarlet Witch, Hawkeye, Falcon, etc. They are supporting characters part of a whole. Obviously they feel the demand is not there, or they already have too many planned features in the works. They're not rushing their storyline, other than with Spidey, but that's time sensitive due to their agreement with Sony. Which I still don't agree with, but that's a whole other discussion.

I also would love if DC would make Batman as a prequel and show his history leading up to BvS with all the hints in the batcave with Robin and Joker.... But that won't happen cause it won't help sell any other movies. We already know from MOS that Superman is the beginning of the meta human. No one before him. Batman existed, but was a myth for only those in Gotham. So a prequel Batman is already limited in they can't really introduce any other heroes. Unless of course, like FOX X-Men movies, they couldn't give a crap about continuity and cohesiveness.... Which in all likely hood is right up there alley.

I guess we will just agree to disagree as i don't have the energy to continue today. :lol

I do wanna chime in and say that RO's reshoots weren't just the ending, the whole last 3rd of the script was changed, and them dying was just a part of that. Also, the Avengers used footage from Cap 1. Same way BvS used footage from MoS. DC's movies are also undeniably more grounded and realistic by miles compared to the MCU thus far.
 
I guess we will just agree to disagree as i don't have the energy to continue today. :lol

I do wanna chime in and say that RO's reshoots weren't just the ending, the whole last 3rd of the script was changed, and them dying was just a part of that. Also, the Avengers used footage from Cap 1. Same way BvS used footage from MoS. DC's movies are also undeniably more grounded and realistic by miles compared to the MCU thus far.

Yea, that's what I said about RO. Edwards didn't think they'd let him kill all the characters which is what he always wanted. Kennedy said go for it, thus the changes. And they also (Disney) didn't want too much Vader in the movie, that's why he was a late edition too. My point is Disney/Kennedy didn't make him change his story, he got the ok to fulfill his true vision. Miles and miles apart from what happened to SS.

You mean the couple of seconds of flashbacks when Cap's training and talking to Fury? They were relevant to his scene and how he's a man out of time. If they were edited out of the movie it would have no effect on the rest of the story.

Imagine if the footage of MOS was cut out of BvS??? Everyone would wonder the whole movie as to why Batman hates and wants to kill Superman. It wasn't even a flashback, it was literally cut, paste, edit of Bruce running around like an idiot and giving Supes the stinkeye. "How dare you save thousands", terrible when considering Batman has absolutely no regard for the destruction he's causing in BvS while in his Batmobile, or the whole ending. And yeah, abandoned buildings. Right, no homeless people or drug addicts shacked up in those places. This is grounded in reality, right? How many innocent people did he let die? Maybe in the next movie, some villains or heroes family was injured in his battle with Supes, and they too will kill some more innocents in order to get revenge.

Just my last take as well.... :duff
 
I think it's funny how some reviewers are saying that Wonder Woman followed marvels movie method and and made a funny bright, positive movie. So when DC gets it wrong blame WB but when they get it right thank Marvel.
 
I think it's funny how some reviewers are saying that Wonder Woman followed marvels movie method and and made a funny bright, positive movie. So when DC gets it wrong blame WB but when they get it right thank Marvel.




mickey-laughing-400-x-308.jpg
:monkey3
 
I think Marvel should be thanking D.C., if they didn't have the balls to do superman the genre wouldn't exist, and comics would be more dead now than ever.
 
I think Marvel should be thanking D.C., if they didn't have the balls to do superman the genre wouldn't exist, and comics would be more dead now than ever.

Eh, Marvel had the first anti-hero in Namor, so technically... it's a moot point. It's not like Jack and Stan would not get their ideas for F4 & all the rest.
 
Wait, Batman was the first anti-hero :lol

Comics are a resilient medium. Superman the movie not existing wouldn't have killed comics, and Superheroes on other mediums other than comics have been a thing before STM too, STM was the Fox-Men 1 of its time, it was another revitalization but it wasn't the creation.

I would like to say the usual "Yeah if Superman didn't exist you would have none of this", but... If anything, if the Sumerians hadn't written the epic of Gilgamesh, we wouldn't have superhero movies now, so thank the Sumerians.
 
My wife and I really enjoyed the Wonder Woman film. We could care less the gender of the director as the movie should stand on its own merits. In a few years most people wont even really remember the whole behind the scenes crap. Our world has h=gotten to sensitive and everybody wants a participation trophy. Glad its getting good reviews and hopefully D.C. can get more movies to get both critical success and financial success. Great time to enjoy superhero movies
 
MCU total box office sits at 11.7 billion, latest movie on track to hit 1 billion, I agree what a massive failure and decline they should shut it down before they implode.
 
2.14 too funny :lol

shes is a top ,top bird in my book , nice to see some hollywood folk that dont have their thumb up their own arse and being so precious about their "craft" :lol

 
Back
Top