Agreed on both counts.
So far in 2016:
1. Captain America: Civil War
2. The VVitch
3. 10 Cloverfield Lane
4. The Jungle Book
5. Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
6. X-Men: Apocalypse
7. Deadpool
Deadpool farting at his roommate is better action than BvS. At least it wasn't CGI.
oh god come on civil war is not on the level of cloverfield and the witch thats an insult to two of the most original movies i've seen in a while
DP was a better written character than any of the characters in BVS. He was more sympathetic than Hopeman and Batffleck too Not only that, DP and his girl had real chemistry unlike Lois and Clark...hell, the supporting characters, the villains were all better too, even the taxi driver was a more compelling character than anything in BVS
But TWS/CW have absolutely earned their place on the originality list.
Seriously, what other superhero movie has juggled as many characters as CW did while perfectly providing each individual character not only their own story arc but also their own individual thrilling action scene AND then having to give the same level of care and attention for when they were teaming up!
It broke new ground as far as i'm concerned, as did TWS.
No other superhero movie has ever presented their action in this manner starting with STM, none of them have had this level of action, period.
That's original in my book.
I think X2 did a much better job handling the main characters of that movie than CW.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I see people jumping on Faraci but, erm, did anyone happen to notice that, with exception of maybe his last 2 paragraphs about the X-franchise as a whole, his review about this film was absolutely ****ing dead-on accurate?
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137307&p=8645066&viewfull=1#post8645066
Seriously, agreed with everything he said about this film.
I see people jumping on Faraci but, erm, did anyone happen to notice that, with exception of maybe his last 2 paragraphs about the X-franchise as a whole, his review about this film was absolutely ****ing dead-on accurate?
https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showthread.php?t=137307&p=8645066&viewfull=1#post8645066
Seriously, agreed with everything he said about this film.
But I didn't buy into his problem.
Saved from imminent terminal cancer death, check.
Given super human agility and healing powers, check.
Trade off was slightly worse face, not a bad trade off at all, he's alive and has super powers!
Now wants to kill the guy and organization who did him this favor, wut!
Therefore he's way more of an ******* than Hopeman, Batman, Magneto and Tinycalypse!
Dumb jokes too.
I don't agree with him labeling the entire franchise terrible
Well, they did only have 3 to concentrate on.
Hmmm, really just 1. Snikt Snikt.
Enter your email address to join: