The head sculpt is lacking, I agree. It looks quite generic. Sideshow has some really, really talented portrait sculptors, and I feel that this is not on the same level as that.
The head sculpt is lacking, I agree. It looks quite generic. Sideshow has some really, really talented portrait sculptors, and I feel that this is not on the same level as that.
You're trying to tell me this is a good quality picture from the face?
The head sculpt is lacking, I agree. It looks quite generic. Sideshow has some really, really talented portrait sculptors, and I feel that this is not on the same level as that.
I was looking back at some of the earlier pics. The black globe thing is awesome looking and the detail on the base is extraordinary. Even love the purple change-o-head.
Just doesn't fit the rest if the body for me. The figure is intricately detailed and the way everything lays out its as realistic as a floating mystic can get. The portrait doesn't convey the same thing to me. Kinda mismatched.Agreed, purple would be my display choice but I see nothing wrong with the other portrait. Sculpt is fine, no googly eyes and the paint app is sharp.
Just doesn't fit the rest if the body for me. The figure is intricately detailed and the way everything lays out its as realistic as a floating mystic can get. The portrait doesn't convey the same thing to me. Kinda mismatched.
Really...I wasn't clear enough?No idea what your post means tbh but everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Really...I wasn't clear enough.
So you're saying that because of the subject matter the realistic style of the body doesn't have to match in the portrait?It's clear that it's fuzzy. You're talking about a comic inspired statue with a floating mystic being 'realistic' and a portrait that isn't realistic enough for you.
So you're saying that because of the subject matter the realistic style of the body doesn't have to match in the portrait?
Just doesn't fit the rest if the body for me. The figure is intricately detailed and the way everything lays out its as realistic as a floating mystic can get. The portrait doesn't convey the same thing to me. Kinda mismatched.
No idea what your post means tbh but everyone is entitled to an opinion.
Really...I wasn't clear enough?
It's clear that it's fuzzy. You're talking about a comic inspired statue with a floating mystic being 'realistic' and a portrait that isn't realistic enough for you.
So you're saying that because of the subject matter the realistic style of the body doesn't have to match in the portrait?
Last I checked the comment I made that you felt obligated to quote didn't have the terms 'realistic' or 'realistic style' in them at all.
The facial sculpt on the other hand does not convey the same sense realism that the body was sculpted with. It's more blocky and doesn't look like a face that fits with the rest of what has been sculpted here. Even the Altar the book rests on, while obviously fantasy based, is more realistically sculpted than the portrait. The entire sculpt is well executed stylistically until you get to his head, which looks like it wasn't even sculpted by the same person at this point.
Jesus Christ. Can there be one XM thread in which criticism isn't met with attitude?
Can there be one of any thread you mean.