franpincho
lol@$300 head sculpts
People just get offended over everything nowadays. Even dollies.
Agreed. I see so many people gush over custom sculpts I think look like crap just because they're custom seemingly. Hot Toys aren't always perfect but I think they take more flak than they deserve.The thing is, though, that I have absolutely no problem with this sculpt. If another sculptor board member posted this pic and offered just the painted sculpt for $160 plus shipping he'd have more work than he can handle.
View attachment 265751
View attachment 265752
People just get offended over everything nowadays. Even dollies.
Agreed. I see so many people gush over custom sculpts I think look like crap just because they're custom seemingly. Hot Toys aren't always perfect but I think they take more flak than they deserve.
There really needs to be a sub-thread opened for every HT release these days - one where no negative talk about the product will be allowed whatsoever.
I don't think they should take no criticism but by and large I don't think most of their output is as bad as some people like to make you believe. They have figures that they really knock out of the park and some that fall short. I personally don't see a lot of really bad figures put out by them. They seem like an easy target because they're a bigger company and to some people it seems to be the mentality that because it's mass produced its not as good whereas if it's a customized or smaller company it's better for whatever reason.Um... that's absurd.
People aren't idiots - nobody hands over up to $100 for a raw sculpt then another $100-300 to get it painted simply because they prefer the custom over a commercially produced sculpt. That's nutso thinking.
And nobody associates custom sculpts with "perfect." People buy it if it works or brings something new, or they don't if it doesn't.
There really needs to be a sub-thread opened for every HT release these days - one where no negative talk about the product will be allowed whatsoever.
I don't think they should take no criticism but by and large I don't think most of their output is as bad as some people like to make you believe. They have figures that they really knock out of the park and some that fall short. I personally don't see a lot of really bad figures put out by them. They seem like an easy target because they're a bigger company and to some people it seems to be the mentality that because it's mass produced its not as good whereas if it's a customized or smaller company it's better for whatever reason.
Do you guys think Hot Toys will do TESB now?
This is just your opinion though and that of a small amount of collectors. There are fans such as myself that don't look over costumes with a fine toothcomb. Does HT Vader look like Vader to me and any normal person? Of course it does. Modding a $300 figure because the helmet is not an exact replica at 1/6 the scale is highly **** imo.I have no brand loyalty whatsoever (I constantly dump on SSC for their stupid-high prices and awful apps,) but let's be clear - we are firmly in the era of "Eh, I'll wait for HT." Where there's a sense that simply because it's HT, it rules (and SSC or any other company could never possibly even come close) - whether the HT fig in fact has a good likeness or is accurate - or not. So it's the reverse of what you're saying.
Surprisingly, HT's SW line has been a little underwhelming in terms of likeness. Lots of deep sculpt detail, ultra-real apps - yes. But likeness - not so much. This is Star Wars - there have been "sort of accurate" versions of these characters in 1/6 for nearly 20 years. We don't need another Ben that looks like a generic old man with a white beard. For $220.
Yes, Leia's sculpt/paint was knocked out of the park. Parts of Chewy and stormie were knocked out of the park (not the heads). The Vader helmet with a lot of mods can look excellent. But fair amount of the line is neither knocked out of the park nor "fall short" figs (by which I assume you mean a "miss.") Somewhere in the middle. Not "nailed." A surprising - for HT - number of mistakes, inaccuracies, and middling likeness.
This Yoda is middling to decent. Sculpt detail and apps are and will be gorgeous. Outfit looks average (compared to others) Likeness to ESB Yoda? Decent, I like it - though it's jowly,eyes are small and head a bit bulbous.
The fact we have another thread titled "which is the best Yoda?" after the HT full reveal says this is probably not the home run it should have been - coming from Hot Toys as it is, and costing $200.
And the "mentality that because it's mass produced its not as good whereas if it's a customized or smaller company it's better for whatever reason"? You are seriously saying that people say "blah" to a HT figure and go with a custom or small company's figure even if it's inferior to the HT fig?
This is just your opinion though and that of a small amount of collectors. There are fans such as myself that don't look over costumes with a fine toothcomb. Does HT Vader look like Vader to me and any normal person? Of course it does. Modding a $300 figure because the helmet is not an exact replica at 1/6 the scale is highly **** imo.
Do you guys think Hot Toys will do TESB now?
I saw in the description that this Yoda is 130 mm tall. And Sideshow Yoda was 140 mm tall.
So I wondered if this difference would be noticeable.
I personally think Yoda was tiny, so I like the idea of a tad smaller Yoda. I did a little photoshop trying to keep the scales.
View attachment 265809
To me they seem pretty much around the same size. It may be that Hot Toys body has a more curved back, having a more noticeable hump maybe. With Sideshow Yoda, I found myself having to work out a better pose and futzing to achieve the more noticeable hump.
I also tried to put some other figures to compare the scale.
View attachment 265810
Enter your email address to join: