The face isn't the same. He has huge cheekbones and the eyes are different. I prefer Prime.
They are the same. Some photos may not look the same. Some art pure Cgi. Some are blended prac and cgi. And some are early unfinished cgi and some are later(between the trailers and covers and merch).
But in the film he does not get a new head. Or a new body. He coats his prime body with vibranium. So whatever his finished prime body looks like, the ultimate will essentially be the same.
Comparing a sculpted toy to a line/pencil art drawing to a cgi render to a computer drawing to early art to protos is why there appears to be ten unique looks. There's essentially two versions of ultron. Mk1 and the later. Call it prime for now. Ultimate (as its called here/now) is an upgraded (by coating it with Vibranium) prime. Not a new body.
So again. Same head.
This is pretty much a clean-cut explanation of all the main changes that need to be made.Actually, all of you guys are right in regards to the fixes on Ultron's face. It's a combination of things, 1) The head and neck are too small in proportion to his body. 2) The lines around his mouth are too thick, they need to be hairline thin, and 3) The eyebrows definitely need to be more curved for that menacing affect. I hope a HT rep is checking out this thread! It will be extremely well done with these fixes!
Not the same.
From what I see:
-The bridge for where the nose would be is smaller
-Cheekbones are very pronounced
-Eyebrows are stronger
-Eyes seem smaller
Imagine the Prime head but with an Ultimate mask over the top. It's still the Prime head underneath those larger eye holes.
Not the same.
From what I see:
-The bridge for where the nose would be is smaller
-Cheekbones are very pronounced
-Eyebrows are stronger
-Eyes seem smaller
It's the same face.
Dude, you're blind.
And "different angles/lighting/unfinished CG"? No, both capped from the same trailer in 1080p.
Look at the faces, I refuse to believe you can't see the differences.
*Edit, just looked back through the thread, you've been struggling with this for some time. He's altered his face via the Vibranium and everyone else can spot it, man.
Again...as I've said over and over....it's not that I don't see differences...it's that they don't mean one is prime and one is ultimate. Do me a favor and show me the scene where they are wearing name tags.
Explain to me how any of the things I explained could not be the reason?
I didn't just say angles. Or lighting. I was explaining how there is not a single screen grab where the heads look the same. So, since you have now shown three seperate heads, and none of them are identical in appearance should I then assume there is mk1, prime, ultimate, and the before unknown version called chipmunk? Or there's even a four..wait, now I've found a fifth and sixth example (yes, go back and look there's even more then that) version if subtle variations in screen grabs, covers, trailers, TV spots and so on mean each one is a different version.
No, I showed you two because there are only two - Prime and Ultimate. Each design is easily distinguishable. If you can't tell the two apart or you believe they're just different angles of the same thing, I don't know what to tell you. Just look at the comparison shots I posted - which might as well have name tags.
Given the significant differences between the two, it wouldn't shock me if HT released Ultimate down the line.
Calm Cool Calculating Prime
Hyper Crazy Super freaked coked up chipmunk Ultimate
I think there's just some miscommunication going on here. Motuxmen, no one is saying that it's not Ultron Prime underneath. I recognize that you're saying how in-universe, it's the same body. The differences that SNIKT1950 is talking about is the design/appearance. You know, the visual cues that separate the two from non-vibranium-coated to vibranium-coated. Not a different body. Not a different "character". But a different design/appearance. It's clear that Ultron Prime's design/appearance looks markedly different with the vibranium finish (that head shot of the two designs are practically night and day there) and that's all they're trying to say.
Hang on, some of those images are a practical suit? (obviously the bright chrome one from Clever Movies is) I thought Ultron would be totally CG, with the practical stuff only used for lighting reference.
Yes. From my picture post...
The top two photos....(the side by sides) the right is practiical costume. With the eyes and checks filled in
The next two (side by sides ) the right is a costume with cgi. The face has not been cgi filled. You can see the dead areas. Where it's flat in the place where the eye socket rings should be. The same with the cheek. It's most obvious if you look at his raised hand. Compare that to the bottom photos hand. You can tell in the photo it's a glove with finger covers.
Now in the movie my guess is most of these missing cgi effects will be fixed. Good chance half the trailer footage won't make the film. But, I was just addressing the photos used to "show" that there are ultimate and prime and differences and those differences are x,y, z
Enter your email address to join: