No, it's a topic now because we have since learned how humiliating the shoot was for Fisher and how she'd implored Ridley to fight against what she wished she had at the time.
Nerds and their "context"... meanwhile, in real life...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/fashion/people/carrie-fisher-iconic-princess-leia-gold-bikini-costume/
"I remember that iron bikini I wore in 'Episode VI': what supermodels will eventually wear in the seventh ring of Hell," Fisher once wrote in Newsweek.
However there was a narrative behind that bikini which meant it was imbued with a more empowering message than some of those sultry film stills might suggest.
In a 2015 interview with the Wall Street Journal, she responded to controversy about an action figure which portrayed Princess Leia in the bikini. Fred Hill, a father of two daughters, had been shocked to see that version of the toy on offer to young children.
"Tell them that a giant slug captured me and forced me to wear that stupid outfit, and then I killed him because I didn’t like it. And then I took it off. Backstage," Fisher advised Hill to tell his daughters, referring to the way her character uses the chains attached to the bikini to strangle Jabba the Hutt.
That would seem to be Fisher herself providing some context. I wouldn't even disagree with your view of it, but I would respectfully suggest that there's more ways of interpreting the costume/ her role than it might first seem. Lucas put her in it because he liked Frank Frazetta art of fantasy women with gigantic ****, which is demeaning, but then she didn't go on to be rescued while screaming for help; and while the costume might be demeaning outside the movie, in the world of the movie its about Leia being demeaned by Jabba. Personally, I find the way she screwed up Han's rescue while disguised as Boushh to be far more sexist.