Vader AL
RTR
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2006
- Messages
- 9,688
- Reaction score
- 8
it's a ridiculous thought to blame an inanimate object. it was an evil person, who could have used other means.
there is a right to bear arms. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stated in 2001 that:
"there are numerous instances of the phrase 'bear arms' being used to describe a civilian's carrying of arms. Early constitutional provisions or declarations of rights in at least some ten different states speak of the right of the 'people' [or 'citizen' or 'citizens'] "to bear arms in defense of themselves [or 'himself'] and the state,' or equivalent words, thus indisputably reflecting that under common usage 'bear arms' was in no sense restricted to bearing arms in military service."
there is a right to bear arms. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit stated in 2001 that:
"there are numerous instances of the phrase 'bear arms' being used to describe a civilian's carrying of arms. Early constitutional provisions or declarations of rights in at least some ten different states speak of the right of the 'people' [or 'citizen' or 'citizens'] "to bear arms in defense of themselves [or 'himself'] and the state,' or equivalent words, thus indisputably reflecting that under common usage 'bear arms' was in no sense restricted to bearing arms in military service."