EVILFACE
Insufferable S.O.B.
Why? He's said time and time again he wanted Kathy to win. He already had his shot. I dont think he expected Avatar to get a BP nom.
They all talk like that. Each of them want it. No doubt.
Why? He's said time and time again he wanted Kathy to win. He already had his shot. I dont think he expected Avatar to get a BP nom.
I took my nephew to go see it at the request of my sister. I also started to fall asleep half way through. The only reason I didn't is because I had a 7 year old next to me and obviously one cannot fall asleep in that situation. As for my retarded comment, yes you kinda deserved it. If you want to have a conversation or speak on one comments when you quote them please insert a question or comment instead of all emoticons. LOL! Thank you drive through.
That some are even mentioning AVATAR in the same breath with those films is what annoys many of us to no end.
There's nothing retarded about quoting the post you are responding to, especially when a lot of people are posting in the same thread at that given moment.
I'n not offended that you called me retarded, but I'd rather you have chosen the right time to do it, when I'm a bit less rational
Speaking negatively of James Cameron or Avatar is dismissive. Both deserve more respect.
I just don't get the haters. Avatar is this generation's Star Wars. It is an honest, simple story based around a solid mythology. It is an adventure that takes you on a trip to a strange new unseen world, and has a clear moral compass.
...and barring that, it leads the way for brand new motion picture technology.
Movie making is a constant evolution, and very few filmmakers have done more for the process than James Cameron. Try keeping that in mind, especially when comparing him to a director that has only made a handful of films. Especially when of that handful runs out of steam after four (... and that fourth one is Point Break).
Speaking negatively of James Cameron or Avatar is dismissive. Both deserve more respect.
I just don't get the haters. Avatar is this generation's Star Wars. It is an honest, simple story based around a solid mythology. It is an adventure that takes you on a trip to a strange new unseen world, and has a clear moral compass.
...and barring that, it leads the way for brand new motion picture technology.
Movie making is a constant evolution, and very few filmmakers have done more for the process than James Cameron. Try keeping that in mind, especially when comparing him to a director that has only made a handful of films. Especially when of that handful runs out of steam after four (... and that fourth one is Point Break).
Speaking negatively of James Cameron or Avatar is dismissive. Both deserve more respect.
I hope that Avatar isn't this generation's Star Wars,
The irony is that a lot of the people trashing Avatar, were whining about the Dark Knight not being considered for Best Picture or Best Director...
DP's all over the world must still have their jaws on the ground. Honestly, it was baffling that it was even nominated in that category, much less it actually winning.
I just don't get the haters. Avatar is this generation's Star Wars. It is an honest, simple story based around a solid mythology. It is an adventure that takes you on a trip to a strange new unseen world, and has a clear moral compass.
...and barring that, it leads the way for brand new motion picture technology.
Movie making is a constant evolution, and very few filmmakers have done more for the process than James Cameron. Try keeping that in mind, especially when comparing him to a director that has only made a handful of films. Especially when of that handful runs out of steam after four (... and that fourth one is Point Break).
Speaking negatively of James Cameron or Avatar is dismissive. Both deserve more respect.
This is where we differ: I simply don't think AVATAR is that special, innovative, or ground-breaking. At all. I think it's 90% technical conceit ("let's make a visual spectacle designed for a 3D/IMAX experience") and 10% what some are claiming it to be, which is supposedly this revolutionary cultural touchstone (like the original STAR WARS). It's just not that special.
And that's not a referendum on Cameron and his true abilities and a filmmaker and storyteller. He's already made some amazing films that truly transcend their subject matter beyond their amazing tech advances. But all of those came before 1997, imho.
Here's the deal: I like AVATAR. It's good. I just don't love it or think it's "great" or a "masterpiece" or anything, and the billions of dollars and Avatard zealots are truly befuddling to me. And you of all people know that I was there from the very beginning, covering the film and all its tie-ins and SDCC last year. I was at the Cameron presentation and 25 minutes of finished footage and I was jacked. But the final film itself never rose above its hype to me. I wouldn't even put it in my Top 3-4 Cameron films. Again, it's good... but it has been hideously over-valued. And if that makes me a "hater", then so be it. But I'd like to think I'm one of the few actually being rational about this thing.
"And this generation's STAR WARS"? I don't see that, either. I think that's just a canard based on the financial success of the film. The fandom sect that is truly obsessed with the film is really relegated to those who let's just say... are far from mainstream. Joe Sixpack has gone to the movie in droves, but I don't see a real cultural impact anywhere. The toys still clog store shelves... and I'm around kids all the time and AVATAR is almost never a topic of discussion (while things like IRON MAN and even CLONE WARS are). STAR WARS literally energized and inspired a huge, huge portion of our generation. Hell, it absolutely helped define some of our very childhoods. Do you really think AVATAR is even close to doing that? No way.
And what is this "brand new" motion picture technology that AVATAR is "leading the way" on? 3D & CGI have already been around, and while it may be the first major movie to utilize those technologies to their fullest it certainly isn't a trailblazer or envelope-pusher in either. We've all seen films with better FX, better 3D, and a better IMAX experience (mostly true IMAX films). This just threw them together and pulled it off all at once. And while that was certainly revelatory, it was far from revolutionary from a technical standpoint.
But it will have at least a short-term impact in Hollywood. Now every studio action event film is announcing 3D. So, it's spawned a fad that may quickly become old. Yippie.
So does Near Dark.
Enter your email address to join: